Originally posted by Robtard
Well I've heard of far younger, but it was for medical/growth/genetic reasons, not gender-issue related. Are you conflating two separate issues again? Seems like you might be.
Far younger is, as you said, for medical shit. For silly tranny reasons the age seems to be around 13-15.
Well shit, f*ck me I stand corrected:
Describes one instance of a kid who was 11 being given it and yup it was for tranny related stuff.
"A St. Louis, Mo., child was classified as female at birth, one of a set of twin girls. But the parents had been discussing puberty blockers with him since he was seven years old, after he had begun dressing as a boy and showing more masculine traits.
“I remember watching a documentary where he learned what blockers were and we talked about it and he was sure that’s what he wanted when the time came,†said his mother, who also asked that the family’s names not be used to protect her child’s privacy.
“As soon as he got breast buds, it was like the panic button was hit,†the mother said. “He was quickly and very intensely uncomfortable and afraid. He would cry, knowing that this was the beginning of something that he didn’t want, that he knew wasn’t right for him,†she said.
In March, after the boy turned 11, a pediatric endocrinologist prescribed the sex hormone suppressor Eligard, an injection that he receives every four months. According to his mother, because they intervened early, the unwanted breast buds receded quickly, along with her son’s depression and anxiety. “I don’t know what we would have done if we were not able to stop puberty so he doesn’t have to feel in constant conflict with his own body,†she said."
Originally posted by dadudemon
Talked about this before.You need to start before they hit puberty. Or else pretty much irreversible changes occur.
I gotta amend my original point:
Leftists: 14 yr olds don't know shit about shit and I'm totally not butthurt over what they said about leftists
Also leftists: They can choose their own gender and be put on puberty blockers long before they turn 14
Leftists OUTRAGED Over Aziz and Louis CK Doing "Anti Woke" Comedy
Ha I touched on this subject earlier and now I see Tim has made a video. The same Vox article he's talking about is what made me mention it. The snowflakes at Vox are hilarious.
Originally posted by darthgoober
Does it meet the legal definition of assault?
The funny thing is Rob is lying to you lol. He's pathetic and what is gonna be awesome is to see how he spins it. Here is the post he's talking about, you will note it says nothing about supporting charges:
Originally posted by Surtur
NPC has no argument, spazzes out, faces consequences. Lol.Leftist Florida Student Throws Milk On Republican Volunteer. She Just Got Some BAD News.
Do I find it hilarious the dumb kunt got in trouble for throwing milk on someone? Yes lol, because it is hilarious.
Good, anyone who thinks he should be forced to bake a cake is a pathetic piece of shit.
"Fast forward a few months. Certain Starbucks locations, less than a year after announcing this enlightened new restroom philosophy, now must install special disposal boxes for used heroin needles. They'll also be removing regular trashcans from some bathrooms after employees expressed concern about getting pricked with needles while changing out the bags. There have been reports of condoms, alcohol bottles, and blood stains on the floors. Indeed, this bathroom free-for-all has made bathrooms ironically less accessible as some Starbucks restaurants have had to close their stalls for extended periods due to, says the New York Post, "prolonged cleaning."
It may be fairly pointed out that Starbucks probably had many of these problems even before the new policy. Yes, and that's exactly the point. That's why the policy existed in the first place. "
Lol.
Originally posted by Surtur
Court finds evidence that the State of Colorado is acting in 'bad faith' toward Christian baker who won Supreme Court fightGood, anyone who thinks he should be forced to bake a cake is a pathetic piece of shit.
Exactly right. I don't think any business should be compelled to serve anyone they don't want to. If that ends up making the business go under then so be it
I do find it strange, though, that the same commentators who said the guy shouldn't be compelled to bake cakes for people he doesn't want to also freaked out when Patreon withdrew service from people they don't want to serve.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Exactly right. I don't think any business should be compelled to serve anyone they don't want to. If that ends up making the business go under then so be itI do find it strange, though, that the same commentators who said the guy shouldn't be compelled to bake cakes for people he doesn't want to also freaked out when Patreon withdrew service from people they don't want to serve.
I can see why you'd find the Patreon thing strange as you don't have all the information on it, so you tried to make a clever false equivalency and failed.
Let me get you up to speed: the issue is more to do with these places not being able to be consistent. Sargon uses a slur off of Patreon and gets penalized(despite the head of Patreon saying people wouldn't be getting in trouble for stuff off platform) . You have people using slurs on the actual platform who haven't been removed.
Indeed Patreon has the right to boot anyone, but they should be consistent about it.