Originally posted by Emperordmb
>Journalist says something... which he cites newspaper evidence from mainstream highly regarded sources
>This is not real evidence>Randoms on Reddit post their opinion of the guy
>This is real evidence
Impressive logic there Putinbot.
You call political actors illegitimate because they're youtubers. But then you argue against the credibility of Tim Pool citing the New York Times and the Spectator as evidence by citing random people on Reddit who nobody has ever heard of, and call Ben Shapiro, editor and chief of a news outlet, alt-right because some Jewish guy made a blog that said so.
You have no room to act like we on the right on here are citing bullshit and you're just citing pure gold.
I guess all I have to do is find random people on reddit or youtube comment sections insulting whoever you cite as a source and your source is illegitimate if that's the standard we're going by.
People know who he is mate, as Mythlord says, he's an edgelord laundering white nationalism.
What's up with that. He's just wandering around and saying "jeez, there seems to be crime and people don't really like the police"
Share
Report
Save
level 1
Rich_Black
America's 29th Favorite Duck
7 points
·
1 year ago
So this dude is basically laundering white nationalism?
Share
Report
Save
level 1
HardFartVictory
11 points
·
1 year ago
As an aside, isn't what Pool is doing — getting cozy with the same people he's covering, shifting his coverage to cast those he's friendly with in a better light, etc. — the exact same thing that drove the Gamergate morons nuts about the "unethical" games journalism scene?
Share
Report
Save
level 2
Pyreson
Alex Jones
22 points
·
1 year ago
That has literally never, ever mattered to them.
Share
Report
Save
level 2
Lemongrabade
3 points
·
1 year ago
the exact same thing that drove the Gamergate morons nuts about the "unethical" games journalism scene
No, they couldn't handle women or "feminist cancer" in their degenerate boys club of brainless consumerism.
Share
Report
Save