Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Started by Emperordmb922 pages

Originally posted by Putinbot1
As soon as he has his youtube channel, he's pushing shit he can't in a paper because "standards".

Except he's pointing to stuff that was published... in multiple newspapers... mainstream ones, famous ones.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
"He is critical of" = "is an edgelord pusing an agenda to the moronic".

Only if you believe you can't be critical of the modern progressive movement without being an edgelord.

I get the feeling you actually believe that though, though I have higher expectations of Mythlord than that.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Except he's pointing to stuff that was published... in multiple newspapers... mainstream ones, famous ones.

Only if you believe you can't be critical of the modern progressive movement without being an edgelord.

I get the feeling you actually believe that though, though I have higher expectations of Mythlord than that.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ChapoTrapHouse/comments/6fmfdq/supposed_neutral_journalist_tim_pool_gets_caught/

ideroller
37 points
·
1 year ago
LOL I watched part of this guys livestream during Portland. He unashamedly mingles with all the MAGA chuds and talks about how everyone he talks to are great decent people and every single instance of violence has been instigated by antifa. And then the chat is just nazis posting kekistani flags and swastikas praising his brave journalism.

neutral my ass

Share
Report
Save

level 2
HardFartVictory
22 points
·
1 year ago
This is his audience now and he knows to cater to them for clicks/likes/whatever to better line his pockets — it's Michael Tracey all over again.

Share
Report
Save

level 1
redwhiskeredbubul
25 points
·
1 year ago
Pim Tool

Share
Report
Save

level 2
ArkL
6 points
·
1 year ago
Hot Gim

Share
Report
Save
level 1
Comment deleted by user
1 year ago

level 2
guccibananabricks
13 points
·
1 year ago
He takes it off when he's just socializin with his fellow "journalists"

Share
Report
Save

level 2
MimesAreShite
6 points
·
1 year ago
ah the indykaila method of courting journalistic legitimacy

Share
Report
Save

level 3
[deleted]
5 points
·
1 year ago
Holy shit I completely forget about this hack. I used to post in an Everton forum and newcomers would post his transfer rumors and get endlessly mocked for it.

Share
Report
Save

level 4
MimesAreShite
5 points
·
1 year ago
he's still going, and has somehow racked up a quarter of a million followers despite being a complete fraud. i'm convinced it's down to the hat.

ETc... He's an edgelord

>Journalist says something... which he cites newspaper evidence from mainstream highly regarded sources
>This is not real evidence

>Randoms on Reddit post their opinion of the guy
>This is real evidence

Impressive logic there Putinbot.

You call political actors illegitimate because they're youtubers. But then you argue against the credibility of Tim Pool citing the New York Times and the Spectator as evidence by citing random people on Reddit who nobody has ever heard of, and call Ben Shapiro, editor and chief of a news outlet, alt-right because some Jewish guy made a blog that said so.

You have no room to act like we on the right on here are citing bullshit and you're just citing pure gold.

I guess all I have to do is find random people on reddit or youtube comment sections insulting whoever you cite as a source and your source is illegitimate if that's the standard we're going by.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
>Journalist says something... which he cites newspaper evidence from mainstream highly regarded sources
>This is not real evidence

>Randoms on Reddit post their opinion of the guy
>This is real evidence

Impressive logic there Putinbot.

You call political actors illegitimate because they're youtubers. But then you argue against the credibility of Tim Pool citing the New York Times and the Spectator as evidence by citing random people on Reddit who nobody has ever heard of, and call Ben Shapiro, editor and chief of a news outlet, alt-right because some Jewish guy made a blog that said so.

You have no room to act like we on the right on here are citing bullshit and you're just citing pure gold.

I guess all I have to do is find random people on reddit or youtube comment sections insulting whoever you cite as a source and your source is illegitimate if that's the standard we're going by.

People know who he is mate, as Mythlord says, he's an edgelord laundering white nationalism.

What's up with that. He's just wandering around and saying "jeez, there seems to be crime and people don't really like the police"

Share
Report
Save

level 1
Rich_Black
America's 29th Favorite Duck
7 points
·
1 year ago
So this dude is basically laundering white nationalism?

Share
Report
Save

level 1
HardFartVictory
11 points
·
1 year ago
As an aside, isn't what Pool is doing — getting cozy with the same people he's covering, shifting his coverage to cast those he's friendly with in a better light, etc. — the exact same thing that drove the Gamergate morons nuts about the "unethical" games journalism scene?

Share
Report
Save

level 2
Pyreson
Alex Jones
22 points
·
1 year ago
That has literally never, ever mattered to them.

Share
Report
Save

level 2
Lemongrabade
3 points
·
1 year ago
the exact same thing that drove the Gamergate morons nuts about the "unethical" games journalism scene

No, they couldn't handle women or "feminist cancer" in their degenerate boys club of brainless consumerism.

Share
Report
Save

Tim Pool is laundering white nationalism?! HAHA okay I'm sorry but that's an idiotic statement, and I don't feel the need to continue this discussion if you unironically believe Tim Pool is laundering white nationalism. It's obvious we'll just be talking past each other.

Consider it a win if you want I don't really care.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Tim Pool is laundering white nationalism?! HAHA okay I'm sorry but that's an idiotic statement, and I don't feel the need to continue this discussion if you unironically believe Tim Pool is laundering white nationalism. It's obvious we'll just be talking past each other.

Consider it a win if you want I don't really care.

Yeah, all those guys do, who cosy up with white nationalists and present their views in a favourable light and you guys in their audience demographic shout, "but Antifa" and love it whilst posting swastikas and Kekistan flags. (Thanks to reddit posters for the construction of this post).

The lengths some people will go to so they can justify ignoring facts they do not like is amazing

Originally posted by Putinbot1
As soon as he has his youtube channel, he's pushing shit he can't in a paper because "standards". "He is critical of" = "is an edgelord pusing an agenda to the moronic".

No.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The lengths some people will go to so they can justify ignoring facts they do not like is amazing
Agreed, do better!

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Agreed, do better!

Agreed, they should do better.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Agreed, they should do better.
"No you!"

Originally posted by Putinbot1
"No you!"

Yea, that is one of the far left's favorite tactics.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yea, that is one of the far left's favorite tactics.
"No your side"

That's another.

Originally posted by Silent Master
That's another.

Your mum Neo.

Lol@ how getting stuff off youtube is bad, but getting it off reddit is good. Gotta love the logic.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Tim Pool is laundering white nationalism?!

Maybe not, several of his Far-Right and Alt-Right buddies certainly do that though.

Brittany Pettibone, James Allsup, Tim Pool, Antonio Foreman, Tim Gionet (aka Baked Alaska) and David Feiner.

IMO, you've been bamboozled by Pool.

Originally posted by Robtard
Maybe not, several of his Far-Right and Alt-Right buddies certainly do that though.

Brittany Pettibone, James Allsup, Tim Pool, Antonio Foreman, Tim Gionet (aka Baked Alaska) and David Feiner.

IMO, you've been bamboozled by Pool.

You're committing a logical fallacy with this, though.

Argue the points, not the person. You'd like to make a hasty generalization so you can dismiss all of Tim Pool's commentary. It would be easier to do that. "He's an Alt-Righter so I don't have to consider anything he says or covers as legit."

But that's too lazy.

The logical fallacy you're committing is the "Guilt by Association" Fallacy. Or the Association Fallacy.

Okay, so he's an Alt-Right associate. So? What else? Which of his points are indicative of Alt-Rightiness? Was it his desire for Universal Basic Income? Universal Healthcare? Immigration Reform to make it easier to naturalize?

Or was it his systematic coverage of terrible and toxic leftist ideals and behavior that makes all his arguments invalid?

I've no real problem with Pool's youtube rants. He's just one of how many edgy YT guys doing it? There's more every year.

Just wish he's be open about who he is and where his stance is coming from, like his Far-Right and Alt-Right buddies.

I made a joke about YT edgelords and now DMB and Putinobot are at each others throats. Boi, I did not mean for that to escalate.