Originally posted by SurturThere should possibly be another class for trans athletes to compete, it's basic biology that males excel in most physical feats, especially strength, so competitions like this are generally unfair.
Trans Athlete DEMOLISHES Four Women's Powerlifting World RecordsLol this is absolutely unacceptable. Does anyone disagree?
Did this trans man at least have surgery to remove the testicles?
Originally posted by Robtard
There should possibly be another class for trans athletes to compete, it's basic biology that males excel in most physical feats, especially strength, so competitions like this are generally unfair.Did this trans man at least have surgery to remove the testicles?
Don't know, even if he did it's not removing all his advantages.
The sad thing is in order to remove these advantages we'd have to give kids hormones at a young age lol. Otherwise, testes or not, this guy has the benefit of biology. I think men's hips are different, our strength is greater, etc. and that doesn't ever 100% disappear.
I'm drunk at the casino, so I get to say whar I REALLY think.
PUTIN!
YOU!
You're allright. Keep rocking that pretty woman, you lucky sob.
Surtur, Dunkin Porter. Get it, drink it, it's good stuff.
Rob!
What's.the comparison of B&B's to coors light, when you're getting the cheap dollar drinks from cocktail waitresses?
I'm a real bastard when I drink, shame on me.
Originally posted by Surtur
Journalist says she 'yelled at a prick with the audacity to wear a f***ing' MAGA hat during concert — and the backlash is biglyShe tweets "I don't understand how people can be so hateful" after admitting to screaming at a dude cuz he had on a hat that hurt her fee fee's.
I'm not even joking when I say I think some of these people will kill themselves if Trump wins again.
This is a level of idiocy and butthurt that not even science can understand.
Question: if a person like this dies, is the world worse or better for it? Are these type of people a net-positive on the world?
Originally posted by dadudemon
This is a level of idiocy and butthurt that not even science can understand.Question: if a person like this dies, is the world worse or better for it? Are these type of people a net-positive on the world?
It depends on her reach, some no name blogger is irrelevant. I checked her twitter(which now you can't read her tweets unless you're an approved follower) and she has 25,000 followers.
Not a massive amount, but it's not exactly small either. I'd imagine most people on twitter do not even get anywhere close to 25k when it comes to followers.
So if we count her as someone with legit influence over people...yes the world would be better off she is was not a journalist.
Where is the outrage from the left over twitter interfering in an election? Or is it only our elections they can't interfere with, everything else is fair game?
Twitter Protects Election Integrity... by Banning Sargon & Tommy Robinson’s Campaign Accounts
The silence speaks volumes.
Heh bearing covered the feminist cafe story:
Melbourne 'Man Tax' cafe got woke / went broke
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Claims Tim Pool is on the left
Tim Pool condemns Twitter
Claims no one on the left condemns TwitterOk
👍
Interesting.
Was this directed at Surt? If so, do you have evidence of the "no one on the left criticizes Twitter?" Seems like a dumb statement because making absolute statements like that is almost always 100% wrong (see what I did, there?).
Many leftists have criticized Twitter for allowing gangsters, MAGA, racists, etc. to do their thing.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Claims Tim Pool is on the left
Tim Pool condemns Twitter
Claims no one on the left condemns TwitterOk
👍
Pool is a gaslighter, Abe Gausted sums him up beautifully.
Journalist and YouTube personality Tim Pool rose to notoriety for live-streaming the Occupy Wall Street protest in 2011 and later investigating the supposed existence of “no-go” zones in Sweden in 2017. But Pool’s reporting has shifted in recent years. He rarely posts street footage now, preferring to offer commentary on various news stories in videos released each afternoon. He describes himself as “center-left” and, usually in brief asides, notes his dislike for Donald Trump. But Pool’s insistence that he supports liberal policy doesn’t match with the rest of his content. A quick scroll through his last 100 videos shows a preoccupation with criticizing the left. For example, there are around ten videos critical of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. There are zero videos critical of Donald Trump.
Isn’t a real liberal allowed to critique the left? Of course! But one would expect some criticism of the Trump administration or Republicans in congress. I decided to see what Tim Pool thought of the Trump administration’s child separation policy — a story that brought the left together in condemnation. The only video I found on his main channel was a story complaining about media coverage. Not a good sign. Maybe Pool was covering what he thought were more important events? Here are some of the videos he published while the family separation policy was in the headlines:
“Why Affirmative Action is Racist”
“Conservatives Are Winning the Red Hen Battle”
“Why Liberals #WalkAway From The Democratic Party”
“Are You Ready for the Second American Civil War?”
Again, not good. But maybe Pool just thinks that child separation is good policy. Perhaps it’s no big deal to him that the government cannot reunite the families of asylum seekers. After all, he could be a liberal with slightly different priorities.
Priorities such as:
Stating without evidence that Seth Rich is “55–67%” likely to be behind the 2016 leak of DNC emails.
Claiming it’s unfair to call British anti-Muslim activist Tommy Robinson “far-right” because he is actually a centrist.
Claiming that the left has “become psychotic.”
Accusing media outlets of lying when they claim that people crossing the border are seeking asylum.
I am praising the pro-Trump “NPC” meme.
Supporting voter ID measures because “Who doesn’t have an ID?”
Accusing the mainstream press of lying about Trump and Fox.
Claiming that there is no merit to any claims against Bret Kavanaugh.
Claiming that he is “pro-choice,” but only if there are “life-threatening” issues for the mother.
I don’t know how one could consider Tim Pool a liberal after looking through his content and listening to his views. His audience seems to agree. They are almost exclusively people who identify as conservatives. Some of them write interesting comments:
Originally posted by dadudemon
Interesting.Was this directed at Surt? If so, do you have evidence of the "no one on the left criticizes Twitter?" Seems like a dumb statement because making absolute statements like that is almost always 100% wrong (see what I did, there?).
Many leftists have criticized Twitter for allowing gangsters, MAGA, racists, etc. to do their thing.
Yeah. Him saying
Where is the outrage from the left over twitter interfering in an election?
And
The silence speaks volumes
Originally posted by dadudemon
Interesting.Was this directed at Surt? If so, do you have evidence of the "no one on the left criticizes Twitter?" Seems like a dumb statement because making absolute statements like that is almost always 100% wrong (see what I did, there?).
Many leftists have criticized Twitter for allowing gangsters, MAGA, racists, etc. to do their thing.
I'm just saying this: anyone who truly thought I meant "literally not a single person does this ever" is dumb as f*ck. Truly stupid.
I'm clearing talking about left leaning media going after twitter for this specific thing. They didn't. It's stupidity or trolling to pretend I'm being 100% literal and that "Tim Pool did it!" is a legitimate response.
Jaden was not being genuine, he knew what I meant and yet made his post anyways. Why pretend like anything else went down here?
Originally posted by Surtur
^And we see why people like Jaden do it lol. They know, no matter what, they'll get a pat on the back for it 😆
^
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
"reaction formation" is another juvenile coping tactic in which the child, unable to cope with their feelings, pretends an emotional response which sharply contradicts their genuine feelings.