Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Started by Robtard922 pages

You and your drugs, man. If you can't find happiness in your heart, you surely won't find it at the bottom of a ash laden pipe. No matter how hard and long you puff.

Originally posted by Robtard
You and your drugs, man. If you can't find happiness in your heart, you surely won't find it at the bottom of a ash laden pipe. No matter how hard and long you puff.

You wanna respond at all? Or just talk about this?

Hey wait, you ever respond to that story about the civil rights commission not being willing to add an amendment denouncing violence from Antifa?

Not sure I'm qualified to help you there. Have you tried a support group?

Huh?

Originally posted by Robtard
Not sure I'm qualified to help you there. Have you tried a support group?

Huh?

I asked if you wanted to respond to my points about the story you were whining over and saying I feel for their "spin".

Also asked if you ever responded to this:

Originally posted by Surtur
Everyone needs to see this, it is ridiculous:

The U.S. Civil Rights Commission refuses to condemn antifa violence. Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/450651/antifa-violence-willfully-ignored-civil-rights-commission-refuses-condemn

[b]On Friday, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights held its monthly meeting in Washington. A liberal member introduced a stirring denunciation of the Nazi, KKK and white-nationalist participants in the Charlottesville rally. But then Commission member Gail Heriot introduced an amendment that would have added the following:

Though we support peaceful protest and note that most of the counter-demonstrators were peaceful, we condemn violence by anyone, including violence by so-called antifa demonstrators.

Seems reasonable. But..

"Karen Narasaki, another commission member, scoffed at Heriot’s reading of Stolberg’s New York Times observation about the antifa activists in Charlottesville. As she voted against Heriot’s amendment, she noted, “You can’t believe everything you read in the media.” Apparently, the “paper of record” for so many liberals is to be considered bird-cage lining material if it contradicts the left-wing narrative. Heriot’s amendment was voted down 6–2."

Why vote it down? [/B]

I haven't looked in the "Antifa hurt my feefees" thread in over a week. Also not sure why you think it's my responsibility to respond to that post. I've moved beyond such petty things as Antifa. I'm transcendent

Originally posted by Robtard
I haven't looked in the "Antifa hurt my feefees" thread in over a week. Also not sure why you think it's my responsibility to respond to that post. I've moved beyond such petty things as Antifa. I'm transcendent

But see Rob, I posted it in the Trump president thread too. Remember when you said you wouldn't look cuz of muh nasty attitude?

Your legendary memory no doubt recalls it.

Oh, that's the same post, didn't realize cos as noted, I didn't really read :/

Repeat: I can't remember things I've not really read. Even my extraordinary memory is limited there (remember we has this convo before)

Originally posted by Robtard
Oh, that's the same post, didn't realize cos as noted, I didn't really read :/

Repeat: I can't remember things I've not really read. Even my extraordinary memory is limited there (remember we has this convo before)

Your extraordinary memory is limited, I'll give you that.

You gonna respond to how the blaze spun the story? Or no? Did you need more time to figure that out? For an intelligent guy like you? Nah, you don't need more time, do you?

Now you're just being snarky.

FFS, you want me to respond this, that, those, them, there, then. But my initial post covered that already and I feel rehashing it would serve no purpose other than bickering

Originally posted by Robtard
Now you're just being snarky.

FFS, you want me to respond this, that, those, them, there, then. But my initial post covered that already and I feel rehashing it would serve no purpose other than bickering

You covered nothing Rob. Gave no explanation as to how the story was spun, or how I was fooled by any spinning of it.

But hey if you did and I missed it, quote it back.

Originally posted by Surtur
You covered nothing Rob.

Duncan disagrees:

Lol oh Liberals...

First-grader sent to principal’s office for misidentifying another child’s ‘new’ gender

Any story that legitimizes obvious bullshit.

Like Scientology.. Or Psychanalysis, Stockholm syndrome, Critical Analysis..

Especially the first.. People gonna believe what they gonna believe, but I just can't understand why we all write off a tin foil hat wearing homeless guy spouting off about aliens, but anyone took Hubbard seriously enough to join his cult.. (You want to bring other religions into it, go ahead. Point is, what we take seriously sure isn't based on pure content..)

Originally posted by cdtm
Any story that legitimizes obvious bullshit.

Like Scientology.. Or Psychanalysis, Stockholm syndrome, Critical Analysis..

Especially the first.. People gonna believe what they gonna believe, but I just can't understand why we all write off a tin foil hat wearing homeless guy spouting off about aliens, but anyone took Hubbard seriously enough to join his cult.. (You want to bring other religions into it, go ahead. Point is, what we take seriously sure isn't based on pure content..)

L Ron Hubbard was doing black magic with Jack Parsons. Also Aleister Crowley is involved.

At least Al knew how to dress cool.

If you are wondering why a rocket propulsion engineer was interested in black magic rituals....yeah, I have no legit reason why that happened.

They just magicked the shit out of some stuff in the desert with L Ron Hubbard. Crowley warned them not to f*ck up the rituals.

Which considering Jack later died in an explosion yeah, I'm guessing they f*cked it up. Sorcery and rocketry never mix well.

‘Pepper ball’ anti-Trump protester hit with second major dose of karma in just days

😆

Awww Poor AntiFa.

I like how he said that he does not support violence against police, yet he's being arrested for kicking and throwing tear gas canisters at police.

Hmmm, weird if true:

Court Admits DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schulz Rigged Primaries Against Sanders