Originally posted by cdtm
Yes.The question is, whether the courts will say "You obviously knew something was going on" because of that warning, or treat it like drug busts that use street terms like "candy" instead of whatever that was they were selling from the movie title I forget just now... 🙂
That was just a hypothetical. I don't know if anything happened at the specific event where Trump ignored Hourney's warnings that Epstein was a pedo and sexual predator. Or did it?
Originally posted by Surtur
His lie isn't your fault, your only fault here is being too dumb to see Trump washed his hands of the guy long before now.
Yet is lying about ever being friends with the guy and that's okay because something, something other people.
And who cares if Trump was warned previously because something.
No, I'm specifically talking about Trump lying about ever being friends with Epstein right now, when he clearly was, so it seems you're the confused one here.
As far as Trump knowing or not knowing, Trump allegedly being told about Epstein and ignoring the warnings doesn't bode well for Trump, but that's not undeniable proof. Who knows, maybe Epstein will tell something relevant if under pressure. Will have to wait and see.
What's funny, you're someone who bought into the Pizzagate nonsense along with all the other clearly nonsense "blood orgies" and "semen cakes" wikileak dump, but this far more believable claim is just too far out there for you.
Originally posted by Robtard
"Look, Donald, I know Jeff really well, I can't have him going after younger girls," Houraney recalled telling Trump. -snipTrump was directly warned that a specific crime (child abuse and/or rape) could happen at one of his events if he proceeded in inviting Epstein . If he ignored the warnings and that crime specifically happened, he could be held liable. eg Epstein's victims could sue Trump (or at least his business).
No they couldn't. That's not how this works. Trump is not liable in any way.
Unless there is evidence that they were conducting business (FYI, this is actually what is meant by "conducting business"😉 and Trump knew that underage girls were being violated by Epstein, and still conducted business on Trump's property to work on business things, there's no case for liability.
Also, I'm reading that these 28 girls were from a sexy calendar shoot thingie. These don't sound like underage at all. What is actually going on?
Originally posted by dadudemon
No they couldn't. That's not how this works. Trump is not liable in any way.Unless there is evidence that they were conducting business (FYI, this is actually what is meant by "conducting business"😉 and Trump knew that underage girls were being violated by Epstein, and still conducted business on Trump's property to work on business things, there's no case for liability.
Also, I'm reading that these 28 girls were from a sexy calendar shoot thingie. These don't sound like underage at all. What is actually going on?
What's going on is desperate leftists thought they once again had "gotten" Trump and have once again failed.
Jesus I think Wile E. Coyote had a greater success rate catching the Road Runner lol.
Originally posted by Surtur
What's going on is desperate leftists thought they once again had "gotten" Trump and have once again failed.Jesus I think Wile E. Coyote had a greater success rate catching the Road Runner lol.
Still wanting to know why some places were reporting that these 28 girls were from a calendar shoot.
Alright...sooo....underage? Adult "entertainment" stars?
Because this is a very big deal.
I am not about to look this stuff up at work any time soon. Someone at home verify the truth on this story.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Still wanting to know why some places were reporting that these 28 girls were from a calendar shoot.Alright...sooo....underage? Adult "entertainment" stars?
Because this is a very big deal.
I am not about to look this stuff up at work any time soon. Someone at home verify the truth on this story.
The girls were flown in for a "Calendar Girl" competition. This was in 1992. The guy who arranged it warned Trump once he found out Epstein was involved. Trump didn't believe him at the time.
We clearly know Trumps mind changed. Since then he booted Epstein from his club after an employee reported Epstein for behaving badly towards her. As I have also said, the lawyer repping Epsteins victims over a decade ago said Trump was the only one willing to help him out and give him info.
There is no evidence the girls brought in were underage. If they were...I can't fathom why Trump would care over Epstein harassing an employee.
This was 1992, we know that in 2002 Trump still was friendly with the guy. All the stuff I mentioned about Trump booting him and helping with the lawyer happened years after Trumps 2002 statement. It's quite possible the incident with his employee convinced Trump that at least some of the shit Epstein was rumored to be into was true.
Originally posted by Surtur
The girls were flown in for a "Calendar Girl" competition. This was in 1992. The guy who arranged it warned Trump once he found out Epstein was involved. Trump didn't believe him at the time.We clearly know Trumps mind changed. Since then he booted Epstein from his club after an employee reported Epstein for behaving badly towards her. As I have also said, the lawyer repping Epsteins victims over a decade ago said Trump was the only one willing to help him out and give him info.
There is no evidence the girls brought in were underage. If they were...I can't fathom why Trump would care over Epstein harassing an employee.
This was 1992, we know that in 2002 Trump still was friendly with the guy. All the stuff I mentioned about Trump booting him and helping with the lawyer happened years after Trumps 2002 statement. It's quite possible the incident with his employee convinced Trump that at least some of the shit Epstein was rumored to be into was true.
How interesting. Seems interesting that this was being spun as a bunch of kids being flown in.
Trump is trash, for sure. But there's no need to lie about his Epstein involvement.
Also, I'm reading a bunch of stuff about wanting to scrub all information about Epstein being Jewish. Why? Seems anti-Semitic to hide the fact that someone is Jewish. That's WWII Nazi stuff. Why hide his Jewishness?
Originally posted by cdtm
This Minnesota pledge thing. Not really so much triggered they voted to nix it, more so that the people on that council thought this was a good idea.Talk about out of touch and oblivious. What.were.they.thinking.
They simply despise the country they live in. I say just leave then, go elsewhere. Go to Canada. Move to New Zealand.
Oh shit speaking of NZ...
Originally posted by Surtur
They simply despise the country they live in. I say just leave then, go elsewhere. Go to Canada. Move to New Zealand.Oh shit speaking of NZ...
Nah, it's straight up pandering. They claimed they'd say the pledge if an opportunity presented itself, like the Boy Scouts of America showing up.
What else is that, except an admission they're social chameleons with all the sincerity of a used car salesman?
Originally posted by Surtur
Noncompliance Kneecaps New Zealand's Gun Control Scheme
"These weapons are unlikely to be confiscated by police because they don't know of their existence," Philippa Yasbek of Gun Control NZ admitted. "These will become black-market weapons if their owners choose not to comply with the law and become criminals instead."
So before ban, guns are presumably registered. After ban, some may move off the map. Object lesson in unintended consequences.
Originally posted by cdtm
So before ban, guns are presumably registered. After ban, some may move off the map. Object lesson in unintended consequences.
Pretty sure the only way to enforce, at least at a decent level, gun bans, is to do it like Japan and do random home invasions and inspections. Most modern countries are not up to that level of disrespect.
Edit - Meaning, if you're not going to do it Japanese style, gun bans just make legal guns become illegal guns. Meaning, you're just making criminals out of good guys.
New York Times writer goes after black comedian for not being woke enough. The reaction is brut
Dave Chappelle triggering lefties. Nice.