Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Started by Surtur922 pages

Politifact Dragged For Pondering the Definition of Murder: ‘Let’s Not BICKER and ARGUE About WHO Killed WHO’

Pathetic.

Growth forecasts are rising and economy looks nowhere near as bad as bond market predicts

Nice.

The right to choose death is bogus.

The Ministry of TRUTH is HERE!!!!!! Lefties go FULL 1984

YouTube video

^Why was he banned again?

Profile just says "all the reasons".

Sounds like they couldn't get him on "etc" this time.

Unless etc includes all the reasons.

I don't see why they bother, he doesn't do any harm.

It's everyone else's fault for getting fed up with him. 👆

Can't even tell if that's sarcasm bro, I just feel like if people get so triggered just ignore him.

But that's just how The Surt feels.

I'm well acquainted with the ignore function.

Trouble is, at some point that it becomes more trouble to ask everyone to ignore someone, rather than just handle that for them.

Originally posted by cdtm
I'm well acquainted with the ignore function.

Trouble is, at some point that it becomes more trouble to ask everyone to ignore someone, rather than just handle that for them.

There clearly a double standard on this board. For what ever he was banned for, pretty sure others have said worse or equal.

Originally posted by cdtm
I'm well acquainted with the ignore function.

Trouble is, at some point that it becomes more trouble to ask everyone to ignore someone, rather than just handle that for them.

I can only say your fake self power face doesn't even fool a amoeba or is it an amoeba or is it the amoeba or well cool.
Why aren't you all cool by the way?

Least-Educated State: California No. 1 in Percentage of Residents 25 and Older Who Never Finished 9th Grade; No. 50 in High School Graduates

Giggle.

Trigger warning, Tim Pool video(one sign of being triggered is thinking Tim is right wing):

Jimmy Kimmel FINED $395K By FCC Over Trump Alert Sketch

YouTube video

Lol TDS strikes again.

Politifact is bias and there is no debating it:

PolitiFact Should Have the Courage to Tell the Truth

First off, Michael Brown was not murdered and you're not very bright if you think otherwise. Anyways, we have some doozies from this:

"Let’s now turn to PolitiFact’s extraordinary analysis. It starts out promising, with an early confession that “in discussing the case with legal experts, however, we found broad consensus that ‘murder’ was the wrong word to use — a legal point likely familiar to Harris, a longtime prosecutor, and Warren, a law professor.”

But hold on, says PolitiFact, we shouldn’t necessarily be focusing on, you know, actual words. That could be problematic. No, really, that’s where this “fact-check” goes next:

That said, experts who have studied police-related deaths and race relations said that focusing too much on the linguistics in controversial cases comes with its own set of problems.

And what are those problems? Well, according to these “experts,” examining the “linguistic distinction” at issue feels “like an attempt to shift the debate from a discussion about the killing of black and brown people by police.” Consequently, “rather than discussing the need for de-escalation tactics and relations between police and communities of color,” the “experts” claim, “this has become a conversation about legal terms. Quite frankly, it’s a distraction that doesn’t help the discussion.”

It gets better:

"It said that because “the significance of Harris’ and Warrens’ [sic] use of the word is open to some dispute, we won’t be rating their tweets on the Truth-O-Meter.”

Is it really “open to dispute”? The word “murder” is a defined term under applicable law. Warren is a Harvard Law professor. Harris is a former prosecutor and state attorney general. They virtually define the term “legal elite.” False claims that a person committed a crime are actionable under longstanding defamation doctrines. So why can’t PolitiFact conclude that they lied? Feast your eyes on this paragraph:

“When my grandmother read the newspaper, she would sometimes blurt, ‘It’s a crime!’ in response to a story,” said Ben Trachtenberg, a University of Missouri law professor. “Everyone present realized that she did not literally mean that someone described in the article had violated a criminal statute. It seems at least possible that (Harris and Warren) wished to convey a sentiment like my grandmother once did and did not intend to apply the criminal law of Missouri as one might on a law school exam.”

Lol oh leftists...

Originally posted by Surtur
Least-Educated State: California No. 1 in Percentage of Residents 25 and Older Who Never Finished 9th Grade; No. 50 in High School Graduates

Giggle.

Not really funny.

Fox makes a pizza reference when talking human trafficking of minors.

I'm sure that wasnt referencing something else.

Originally posted by SquallX
Not really funny.

Well, someone has to be in first place and last place in the areas mentioned. Much rather it be California than my state.

Originally posted by SquallX
Not really funny.

When you consider the habit for the left to try to act superior yeah it's kinda funny.

Google could be opening themselves up a class action lawsuits. Or so he argues:

YouTube video

5 demonetizations, 5 reviews restoring it, does point to something wrong with their monetization system.

Not sure how it works, but if Youtube doesn't need to split the money with content creators, this could be some kind of scam they're running to collect 2 or 3 dollars from a billion low subscribed users, who might not notice their situation for awhile, nor be as motivated to fight it.