Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I saw nothing wrong with this. It's just people doing what they want. With the people they want. And they love each other rather unconditionally. Seems to be the message Jesus Christ taught. 👆

Unless they hurt someone else, leave people the f*ck alone. Let people do what they want.

Even Jesus, after seeing this, would be like "I wish some corrupt businessmen had made this so I could whip the f*ck out of them".

Also setting everything else aside it's a problem when it is super hard to figure out what the commercial is selling. It comes off like an ad for some LGBT youth center or something. It wasn't even like they were shown drinking sprite, wouldn't that have helped? "Oh I'm putting makeup on my transgender son, so loving this son, *takes a sip of sprite* Love the taste of sprite almost as much as my transgender son!"

Originally posted by Surtur
Even Jesus, after seeing this, would be like "I wish some corrupt businessmen had made this so I could whip the f*ck out of them".

And they did! So get the whip ready...

Originally posted by Surtur
Also setting everything else aside it's a problem when it is super hard to figure out what the commercial is selling.

The non sequitur, appeal to emotion, advertisement has existed for a VERY long time. I remember reading about street-marketing tactics used by ancient Chinese businessmen where they'd use these same tactics. Similar to, "Only a true Han buys Yun products. For your Family. For the Dynasty." Completely non-sequitur. Appeals only to patriotic emotion. Doesn't state anything about the product being sold on the street. But the sign is catchy and makes the customers feel patriotic.

Originally posted by Surtur
It comes off like an ad for some LGBT youth center or something. It wasn't even like they were shown drinking sprite, wouldn't that have helped? "Oh I'm putting makeup on my transgender son, so loving this son, *takes a sip of sprite* Love the taste of sprite almost as much as my transgender son!"

No, no, you're right. Coca Cola has done similar adds but it shows them drinking a Coca Cola while doing their appeal to emotion advertising. But Sprite is owned by Coca Cola. So you'd think they would know how to do commercial product placement, better.

Personally I generally wish certain structures in society had more a degree of separation. I generally wish business wasn't involved in government or government involved in business, churches not involved in government and government not involved in churches, churches not involved in business and businesses that don't exist to preach not involved in preaching.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Personally I generally wish certain structures in society had more a degree of separation. I generally wish business wasn't involved in government or government involved in business, churches not involved in government and government not involved in churches, churches not involved in business and businesses that don't exist to preach not involved in preaching.

I Got a Vasectomy Because of Climate Change

Darwin right now:

Originally posted by Surtur
I Got a Vasectomy Because of Climate Change

Darwin right now:

Awesome. Hope he doesn’t get it reverse.

Originally posted by SquallX
Awesome. Hope he doesn’t get it reverse.

"Hope he doesn't get it reversed"-every single person on the planet

DeVos Will Move Ahead With Title IX Plans

Good. These new rules might not be perfect, but they are vastly superior to the Title IX shit the previous admin tried to pull.

I especially have no sympathy for those complaining about cross examination. Scenario: one student accuses another of rape, there are no witnesses, all we have is the word of the accuser vs that of the accused.

Isn't cross examination a great way to get to the bottom of it? There are even rules in place so you can't ask the accuser about past sexual history.

Of course if people don't like these new rules perhaps stop supporting the idea colleges should get involved at all in criminal matters. If a student is convicted of rape? Sure they should expel him, but nobody should be punished based on an accusation.

‘Ford v Ferrari’ is the climate change horror film nobody needed

Lol, the left truly does contain a lot of joyless motherf*ckers. Imagine being so woke you think a movie about racing history that doesn't contain a message about climate change is bad for that reason, but why would it have such a message? The other complaint is that the movie has no people of color, but why would it? This is like when people complained Dunkirk was "too white".

😆

****ing morons. Why do we need to bring climate change in a film that had nothing to do it?

Originally posted by Surtur
‘Ford v Ferrari’ is the climate change horror film nobody needed

Lol, the left truly does contain a lot of joyless motherf*ckers. Imagine being so woke you think a movie about racing history that doesn't contain a message about climate change is bad for that reason, but why would it have such a message? The other complaint is that the movie has no people of color, but why would it? This is like when people complained Dunkirk was "too white".

😆

I'm just upset Matt Damon's character wasn't played by a gay black paraplegic muslim with vitiligo. And that there wasn't a sub-plot in the film about him trying to get them to stop racing cars and to just start racing sailboats.

YouTube video

Well no it's not racist.

@Surtur: or like when leftist snowflakes were upset that a certain zombie game set in Africa had too many black zombies and therefore they claimed it was racist lol. 😂

So the crowder video is long, but he does bring up a few good points. He talks about how native americans view thanksgiving as a day of remembrance and mourning for what was done. What day do they mourn those raped, enslaved, etc. by their fellow natives? Also they immigrated here from Siberia, but are somehow more entitled to the land than others.

And if Americans should reflect on the tragedies committed on this day, why shouldn't muslims spend Ramadan reflecting on all the horrible shit they've done? Why shouldn't Christians spend Christmas mourning over the inquisition?

Originally posted by Surtur
So the crowder video is long, but he does bring up a few good points. He talks about how native americans view thanksgiving as a day of remembrance and mourning for what was done. What day do they mourn those raped, enslaved, etc. by their fellow natives? Also they immigrated here from Siberia, but are somehow more entitled to the land than others.

And if Americans should reflect on the tragedies committed on this day, why shouldn't muslims spend Ramadan reflecting on all the horrible shit they've done? Why shouldn't Christians spend Christmas mourning over the inquisition?

The old shame card.

Pretty much any society in the history of man has a bloody history of expansion. The difference is, they apply the bullshit "who has power" logic to dictate who has to feel shame in their society, vs who get to feel a sense of national/ethnic pride in their.

For example, being proud of the accomplishments of a Muslim majority culture is seen as good.

Being proud of the U.K. in Dunkirk is seen as whitewashing its imperialistic and exploitative past.

Originally posted by Surtur
So the crowder video is long, but he does bring up a few good points. He talks about how native americans view thanksgiving as a day of remembrance and mourning for what was done. What day do they mourn those raped, enslaved, etc. by their fellow natives? Also they immigrated here from Siberia, but are somehow more entitled to the land than others.

And if Americans should reflect on the tragedies committed on this day, why shouldn't muslims spend Ramadan reflecting on all the horrible shit they've done? Why shouldn't Christians spend Christmas mourning over the inquisition?

True Bible-believing Christians were many of the victims of the Inquisitions. They weren't the ones doing the torturing and murdering. Roman Catholics were. More specifically, jesuits were (which is what the false prophet Pope Francis is, btw).

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
True Bible-believing Christians were many of the victims of the Inquisitions. They weren't the ones doing the torturing and murdering. Roman Catholics were. More specifically, jesuits were (which is what the false prophet Pope Francis is, btw).

It was just an example, u could use the crusades or something.

And it's not like on African holidays we expect them to go contemplate the slave trade.

Also you know those things at casinos, I forget the name of the game, but it's a wheel and you spin it and if your ball lands on where you called you win?

Native Americans, who didn't have the wheel until we came along? You're welcome 🙂

Gosh we're givers. Pretty sure we taught them how to domesticate horses too. Okay perhaps that ended in tragedy, but we meant well.

Trigger warning, Tim Pool video:

Comedian FINED $35,000 Over Offensive Joke, REFUSES To Pay

YouTube video

I'm curious, anybody here agree with the fine?