Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Started by Flyattractor922 pages
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Agreed he triggers many on here with logic. Well said Fly!

Pooty just proved the point of another thread discussion here.

Noice.

Why The lefites suc Lyin Beeoutches?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Pooty just proved the point of another thread discussion here.

Noice.

Why The lefites suc Lyin Beeoutches? [/B]

dur

..and unimaginative buttwhirlies?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]..and unimaginative buttwhirlies? [/B]
dur

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Don't let Tim trigger you Surt.

He never does.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]..and unimaginative buttwhirlies? [/B]
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
dur
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
dur

yep....

ACLU Betrays Due Process on Campus | Sues Betsy DeVos Over New Sexual Misconduct Rules

YouTube video

CBS News releases statement on Catherine Herridge's reporting after Dems, media attack her

IMO she has been a quality reporter. Nice to see some defend her, but then we have this shit:

Tweet link

Originally posted by Surtur
CBS News releases statement on Catherine Herridge's reporting after Dems, media attack her

IMO she has been a quality reporter. Nice to see some defend her, but then we have this shit:

Tweet link

When in doubt attack the reporter rather than their story......lulz another stain on the mainstream media system.

Originally posted by snowdragon
When in doubt attack the reporter rather than their story......lulz another stain on the mainstream media system.

Ad hominem, for sure. It's frustrating but it is what it is.

I'd rather see more fact-based coverage with glaring clarifications on opinions vs. facts.

"Yo, here are the facts. Here's what I think about the facts."

Instead of "here are the facts but it is actually a set of biased opinions about the facts and I am misleading you every step of the way. And don't listen to this other person that contradicts me. They are wrong and Nazis."

Originally posted by snowdragon
When in doubt attack the reporter rather than their story......lulz another stain on the mainstream media system.

They are criticizing her for her reporting. The same thing you supposedly cheered those Trump supporters for doing on this same page.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
They are criticizing her for her reporting. The same thing you supposedly cheered those Trump supporters for doing on this same page.

In your opinion is the criticism being hurled at Catherine Herridge over this valid?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
They are criticizing her for her reporting. The same thing you supposedly cheered those Trump supporters for doing on this same page.

So disingenuous.

Is that what they are doing.......

"SCOOP: Catherine Herridge is a partisan, rightwing hack who is a regular conduit for conservative media manipulation ploys because she agrees to publicize things before contacting the target to ask for comment," Bates wrote on Twitter in a since-deleted tweet.

News Flash, that's not criticizing her work as a reporter, that is simply attacking her.

Herridge was attacked on social media after she reported on the "unmasking" list related to the Michael Flynn case that acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell gave Congress this week.
before contacting the target to ask for comment

LOL, there isn't any need to contact anyone to release a redacted report that is simply being given to congress.

Originally posted by snowdragon
So disingenuous.

Is that what they are doing.......

News Flash, that's not criticizing her work as a reporter, that is simply attacking her.

LOL, there isn't any need to contact anyone to release a redacted report that is simply being given to congress.

Yes, that is in fact what they are doing. They criticized her conduct. You may not agree with the criticism, but the criticism is of how she conducted herself, not about her as person. Is there anything else you want to be proven wrong about?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Yes, that is in fact what they are doing. They criticized her conduct. You may not agree with the criticism, but the criticism is of how she conducted herself, not about her as person. Is there anything else you want to be proven wrong about?

Adam, they called her a partisan hack..

Even if she breached some form of courtesy by not contacting them fist for comment, that's attacking more then the papers she released. They're essentially claiming she's so biased as to be untrustworthy.

And what makes her "partisan"? Surely it can't be she is partisan because she reported on a story that doesn't paint the dems in the best light.

Katie Hill says she cried for days after the GOP flipped her former congressional seat: 'f**king devastating'

Lol

First response to her tweet about it being devastating:

Lol. And he's 100% right. It did feel good to read 🙂

Like someone else said. She should not have resigned.

Originally posted by cdtm
Adam, they called her a partisan hack..

...Because she acts like one.