Originally posted by Zenwolf
Question, but maybe I missed it in the thread, though I am curious about. So how come some wanna do away with the...nuclear family? Interesting wording coming from the 1950s. Kinda like it though. Reminds me of the DC comics group.
I did post about it - direct quotes posted.
If they cared about black lives, then they'd try their absolute best to influence black culture to value and improve "nuclear family" stats.
True facts: the biggest difference that could be made in the black community to improve ALL outcomes - income, education, mental health, socio-economic mobility, crime rates, and physical health - is having a strong nuclear family. The father and mother in the same home and all kids have 1 father. This is by the science as there's no greater outcome than what the psychological community calls the "Gold Standard" family. All good science points to the nuclear family creating the very best chances of a positive outcome for children.
Wanting to attack (disrupt) the nuclear family is the worst possible thing you could do to the black community. Lots of ignorant people think that black people suffer from class issues (to explain the black violence problems) but that's not true. The real problems within the black community can be traced to the lack of a nuclear family. The Black Culture problem is really a lack of a black nuclear family problem.
If you do not see any charity organizations that address the nuclear family issues (such as the lack of a black, strong, intelligent, and successful male figure), it's almost assuredly a shit charity that isn't actually helping black people.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Broken homes are more likely to be poor and the poor are more likely to vote Democrat. you do the math.
I did the math and found that this is the reason:
"I'll have those n*ggers voting Democratic for 200 years."
"These Negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days and that's a problem for us since they've got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we've got to do something about this, we've got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference."
-Lyndon B. Johnson, Democrat
If they cared about black lives, then they'd try their absolute best to influence black culture to value and improve "nuclear family" stats.
This has been brought up more than a few times in the past only to be blown past regardless of the facts that support said position.
It's not just income, anyone that has raised a kid knows the amount of time involved which is harder for a single parent and gets worse with more kids.
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Shush, don't tell them the truth Adam, they can't handle that. What they want is stupid people on YouTube echoing their own stupidity and prejudice.
He's not telling the truth though. He'd factor in for population percentages if he was.
But you're an unthinking cheerleader so nobody is shocked you didn't question it.
In 2016, CNN Extolled the 'Majesty' of Mt. Rushmore...What Changed?
I too am curious how Mt. Rushmore is problematic now, but it wasn't back in 2016.
"CNN Trashed Mount Rushmore During Trump Visit, But Praised It During Obama Visit"
President Donald Trump’s trip to Mount Rushmore on Friday was met with jeers from the ever-so-reliably anti-Trump network CNN, which had all kinds of negative things to say about the monument in connection to Trump’s visit.
“President Trump will be at Mt. Rushmore where he’ll be standing in front of a monument of two slave owners and on land wrestled away from Native Americans told that [they are] focusing on the effort to, quote, tear down our country’s history,” reported CNN Leyla Santiago.
It’s amazing how Mount Rushmore went from “quite a sight,” “majestic,” and “a fitting campaign stop” when Obama visited but turned into a symbol of slavery and oppression when Donald Trump visited.
It’s funny how that all works.
Funny indeed.
Ever wonder why the coworker who is easily offended seems to be unproductive?
That's because they are.
According to a new study, people easily offended and "triggered" don't get work done, in the workplace.
They should start making people take tests before hiring them to see if they are easily offended. People who are easily offended represent a liability in the workplace as they are less capable of getting work done and more likely to bring up lawsuits or waste time with frivolous complaints to HR/legal.
Stop hiring the triggered and snowflakes.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0148296320303416?via%3Dihub
Abstract
For all the news stories devoted to individuals taking offense to various issues, little is known about these individuals or their work-related habits. To address this important gap in organizational and societal knowledge, the reported research draws on cognitive interference theory to define and measure the proclivity to be offended (PTBO). This measure was hypothesized to serve as an off-task stimuli, and results of a time-separated multi-source study found PTBO negatively relates to employees’ task performance and citizenship behavior, and positively relates to counterproductive behavior, as rated by one’s supervisor. PTBO also had implications for employees’ self-reported job satisfaction and workplace engagement. Building on the idea that PTBO may also influence the way employees view their organization’s actions, overall organizational justice was hypothesized and found to mediate the relationship between PTBO and both employees’ behavior and attitudes. Implications for managers and organizations concerned with modern societal movements are discussed.
Double trigger warning, Tim Pool video that also exposes leftist hypocrisy:
Leftists OUTRAGED After Trump Supporters Paint Over BLM Mural, If Leftists Can Paint Why Can't They?
Can't say I agree with what these people did, but on the other hand over the last few weeks it sure has seemed like leftists have been acting like vandalism is acceptable. Especially if there are strong emotions behind the reason you're vandalizing something.
Originally posted by Surtur
Double trigger warning, Tim Pool video that also exposes leftist hypocrisy:Leftists OUTRAGED After Trump Supporters Paint Over BLM Mural, If Leftists Can Paint Why Can't They?
Can't say I agree with what these people did, but on the other hand over the last few weeks it sure has seemed like leftists have been acting like vandalism is acceptable. Especially if there are strong emotions behind the reason you're vandalizing something.
Self-identified liberals do not describe members of a group to which the purport to belong as "leftists." Furthermore, no one is triggered over this. They painted it back the next day. Big whoop.
So BLM killed an 8 year old.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTEemY1d0dc
I'm not even sure what to really say other than, WHAT THE ***?!
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Self-identified liberals do not describe members of a group to which the purport to belong as "leftists." Furthermore, no one is triggered over this. They painted it back the next day. Big whoop.
I thought they had gotten permission to write out BLM so it wasn't illegal which would make the covering act illegal.