Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Started by Old Man Whirly!922 pages

Originally posted by BackFire
Tucker Carlson claims to have had authentic, unique and extremely damning evidence against Hunter Biden, but lost the only copy in the mail.

https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-carlson-says-he-had-authentic-damning-new-hunter-biden-documents-it-got-lost-mail-1543084

😂 What an ass he is YouTube video

Originally posted by BackFire
Tucker Carlson claims to have had authentic, unique and extremely damning evidence against Hunter Biden, but lost the only copy in the mail.

https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-carlson-says-he-had-authentic-damning-new-hunter-biden-documents-it-got-lost-mail-1543084

Oh Trumpers...

More like, stolen by the Post Office.

Originally posted by BackFire
Tucker Carlson claims to have had authentic, unique and extremely damning evidence against Hunter Biden, but lost the only copy in the mail.

https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-carlson-says-he-had-authentic-damning-new-hunter-biden-documents-it-got-lost-mail-1543084

I commented on this, already.

Why didn't they create digital copies, create an archive (zip or 7z), encrypt it, password protect it, and send it?

It takes no longer than 30 seconds.

And if he has to scan 1,000 pages or something: I'm sure the most successful cable news organization in the US has access to business-class printer-copier-scanners and it would take an hour, at the most, to scan all those documents. Maybe it requires photos? Then take a picture with your smart phone which has the capability of taking very high quality pictures, these days.

And then zip up all that data into an encrypted zip file. Send it over e-mail to Tucker. And give him the password, verbally, over the phone over a secured communications channel (WhatsApp encrypts comms which makes some governments mad).

Just saying...this sounds like a fishy story to me. They do not seem like completely tech-illiterate old men who have never used a computer, before.

I think the reason that Tucker Carlson's team didn't make copies of the documents via tech was because they are in fact not real

Originally posted by dadudemon
I commented on this, already.

Why didn't they create digital copies, create an archive (zip or 7z), encrypt it, password protect it, and send it?

It takes no longer than 30 seconds.

And if he has to scan 1,000 pages or something: I'm sure the most successful cable news organization in the US has access to business-class printer-copier-scanners and it would take an hour, at the most, to scan all those documents. Maybe it requires photos? Then take a picture with your smart phone which has the capability of taking very high quality pictures, these days.

And then zip up all that data into an encrypted zip file. Send it over e-mail to Tucker. And give him the password, verbally, over the phone over a secured communications channel (WhatsApp encrypts comms which makes some governments mad).

Just saying...this sounds like a fishy story to me. They do not seem like completely tech-illiterate old men who have never used a computer, before.

Probably just that the evidence is was pretty worthless and they initially recognized it as such and so didn’t put much effort into preserving it, and it wasn’t until they lost it that they decided to hype it up since no one would be able to ever see what it actually contained and contradict their claims.

Or they always thought it was a big deal and are just ****ing idiots.

Originally posted by Quincy
I think the reason that Tucker Carlson's team didn't make copies of the documents via tech was because they are in fact not real

Bingo.

Either that, or it was real but another nothing-burger story and the "we had the proof!" angle now is more damaging than actually showing what they had.

What cry for attention tactic did Surt do this time to get himself banned so he can then play martyr-boy again?

I think between Quincy, Backfire, and Robtard, you've captured the truth in there, somewhere.

It's clearly fishy and does not stand up to scrutiny.

What's more believable, that Tucker Carlson would try to ship damning evidence via the post office, with it's known liberal, selfish union doesn't, and they would steal it to keep the cover up of bidens crooked dealings out of the news, or he would make up a story about having evidence, and then say the post office stole it?

Think about the integrity of the two parties at play here and the answer is obvious. Tucker carlson had nothing to gain by lying about this story, and is a model of journalistic integrity. I'll take his word over the lying thieving post office any day.

Originally posted by Robtard
What cry for attention tactic did Surt do this time to get himself banned so he can then play martyr-boy again?
I think it was frankly just cumulative mod baiting. He needs to chill.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
I think it was frankly just cumulative mod baiting. He needs to chill.

"Mod baiting" seems like he wanted to get banned again to then be a martyr in his own mind. What a weird weirdo, that's like High School level nonsense. I kinda feel bad for him.

Originally posted by Robtard
"Mod baiting" seems like he wanted to get banned again to then be a martyr in his own mind. What a weird weirdo, that's like High School level nonsense. I kinda feel bad for him.
Yeah, but he was always implying the mods were biased and because of that they had no power, tbh it's a collective Voltron narrative. So, eventually, a mod would ban him. Now as you can say he can get his laminated "victim card" from his bedside table and start playing it again.

He should get a victim card where it can be hole-punched 10 times and then the 11th victimhood is free.

I got one for this fancy sausage stand I sometimes eat at. I got 7 punches, 3 more and I get a freebie!

Originally posted by Robtard
He should get a victim card where it can be hole-punched 10 times and then the 11th victimhood is free.

I got one for this fancy sausage stand I sometimes eat at. I got 7 punches, 3 more and I get a freebie!

😂

They give you chips and a drink too.

Originally posted by Robtard
They give you chips and a drink too.
Hahahahaha I was so pissed off last year, Cafe Nero do six coffees and you get one free in the UK I was back in the UK for a few weeks got up to five and lost the first card, got another and got to four and flew back...

https://bc.ctvnews.ca/lawsuit-from-b-c-man-who-thought-canada-dry-ginger-ale-had-medicinal-properties-settled-for-200k-1.5165150

Ridiculous.

Originally posted by BackFire
Tucker Carlson claims to have had authentic, unique and extremely damning evidence against Hunter Biden, but lost the only copy in the mail.

https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-carlson-says-he-had-authentic-damning-new-hunter-biden-documents-it-got-lost-mail-1543084

Originally posted by BackFire
“My dog ate my homework”

L-O-L

China apparently treats fishing like we treat toilet paper.

YouTube video

Very well done video, imo. The man claims he's of South African origin, used to live in China, and married to a Chinese wife. He offers proof China is culturally inclined to fish as much as they can from the ocean in response to an innate fear of starvation, and has already overfished waters surrounding mainland China.

This is actually a pretty serious ecological problem, if true, because no one is willing or able to stand against them on this.