Police shoot and kill Australian Woman

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
awww baby's mad because the mean troll won't accept his narrative. :'(

I'm mad because I said you were wrong? How desperate are you?

because reality is made up separate and unique instances, as opposed to the one-size-fits-all narrative in your stunted child-brain.

No, I don't believe this as your reason. I think it's because you know you wouldn't of opened your mouth up if race had been named, even if it was a story where nothing was known yet in terms of if the person was "executed" etc.

Do you have the balls to even admit you wouldn't have said anything, regardless of circumstances?

Originally posted by Robtard
See: Precedent

Now if there was some epidemic of Somali (or even just Black) cops shooting white women in suspicious circumstances, then you'd have a point, sport.

As this story looks, race played no part. The guy seemingly shouldn't be a cop and he quit possibly murdered someone. Try and focus on that.

Then him being a Somali immigrant was an unnecessary part of the narrative yes? It would have been enough to include his name and say he killed a woman unless there was some other reason for stating it. You stated this earlier sarcastically unless I misunderstood you.

Originally posted by socool8520
Then him being a Somali immigrant was an unnecessary part of the narrative yes? It would have been enough to include his name and say he killed a woman unless there was some other reason for stating it. You stated this earlier sarcastically unless I misunderstood you.

it's the first piece of info given, which suggests that it is the most significant and worthy of note. if it was stated as a footnote, it wouldnt be such obvious snake-like racist dogwhistling.

^

^

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it's the first piece of info given, which suggests that it is the most significant and worthy of note. if it was stated as a footnote, it wouldnt be such obvious snake-like racist dogwhistling.

Except that it actually doesn't enhance anything. He shot a woman. That is the most significant piece if information in the article. Including that he was Somali, imo, was a weak way of trying to race bait by the author. It was not relevant in the slightest.

it seems we'll just have to agree to agree. i was just stating that it wouldn't have struck me as so blatantly racist if it wasn't paragraph 1 line 1.

Originally posted by socool8520
Except that it actually doesn't enhance anything. He shot a woman. That is the most significant piece if information in the article. Including that he was Somali, imo, was a weak way of trying to race bait by the author. It was not relevant in the slightest.

Bingo, then they tell others to focus on what happened after they've whined about dumb racist bullshit.

Originally posted by Surtur
Bingo, then they tell others to focus on what happened after they've whined about dumb racist bullshit.

lol he called the article blatant race baiting and you rushed to agreement because of the simple fact that they were disagreeing with me. you should read peoples posts before replying from now on. how humiliating for you. bingo indeed.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
lol he called the article blatant race baiting and you rushed to agreement because of the simple fact that they were disagreeing with me. you should read peoples posts before replying from now on. how humiliating for you. bingo indeed.

That is my bad I misread, I thought he'd said it was an attempt at you race baiting the author of the thread.

No more humiliating than you being wrong about me voting in the other topic 🙂

no actually your desperate pal-seeking behavior is way more humiliating than the revelation that I'm either not psychic or not hacked into your account. 😉

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
no actually your desperate pal-seeking behavior is way more humiliating than the revelation that I'm either not psychic or not hacked into your account. 😉

Desperate pal seeking? I said bingo because I misread and thought he'd said something I agree with.

But hey continue to play it up differently, I love knowing the usage of the word "bingo" is desperate pal seeking, I will keep this in mind if I see anyone else repeat it 👆

let's just focus on turning the page on your latest embarrassing episode. how about a lyrics chain?

in the town where i was born,
lived a man who sailed to sea...

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
let's just focus on turning the page on your latest embarrassing episode. how about a lyrics chain?

in the town where i was born,
lived a man who sailed to sea...

We can focus on other stuff if you want, but just know your comment will be remembered if I see any folk using the word bingo in the future.

When the time comes what excuses do you think will be used to explain why it's different?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
lol he called the article blatant race baiting and you rushed to agreement because of the simple fact that they were disagreeing with me. you should read peoples posts before replying from now on. how humiliating for you. bingo indeed.

LoLz. How embarrassing for Surtur. So desperate to make an eFriend.

Hopefully he learns a lesson and fully reads and understands someone's post(s) going forward.

Originally posted by Robtard
LoLz. How embarrassing for Surtur. So desperate to make an eFriend.

Hopefully he learns a lesson and fully reads and understands someone's post(s) going forward.

It would seem we are both desperate for friends, by this logic.

Originally posted by Surtur
It would seem we are both desperate for friends, by this logic.

You're assuming I did what you literally just did: hastily read someone's post thinking they were saying something else and then tried to swing from that person's nuts, that was all you, sport.

This is you right now:

It's obvious.

this is the part where robtard challenges you to post a quote where he nut hugs a stranger without reading their post in full, and then you either cower off or lead him down a new rabbit hole. :edit: oh well. too slow.

Originally posted by Robtard
You're assuming I did what you literally just did: hastily read someone's post thinking they were saying something else and then tried to swing from that person's nuts, that was all you, sport.

This is you right now:

It's obvious.

Lol so just to be clear now: because I misread and thought he said something I agreed with, it means I was hanging from his nuts?

I want you to just type that out for me.

Because there is nothing I said in my post that suggests I was desperate to befriend this poster.

you have to first read a sentence before you can claim to have misread it.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you have to first read a sentence before you can claim to have misread it.

Lol I thought the post said one thing, when it was pointed out it didn't I admitted it was wrong. You had something you could talk shit about, but you had to ruin it with the whole "you were swinging on his nuts!" thing.

Why is it leftists always shoot themselves in the foot? Is it something you truly can't help?