Video Surfaces of Collusion

Originally posted by Surtur
How did they collude and why is getting information about potential collusion...collusion?

Here is a clue: Trump Jr. admitted it, and posted the email communications that confirm it.

That it happened is an established fact. We have his confession.

So if you do not understand the hows and whys at this point, it does not really matter.

He confessed to colluding? I thought he confessed to being willing to hear info on folk colluding. Silly me.

-And agreeing to a meeting in which he and two others thought they would be colluding with the Russian government

-And going to said meeting in which he and two others thought they would be colluding with the Russian government

-And Repeatedly lied about the specifics of said meeting to collude

But hey, it fell through and attempt means nothing. It's why attempted murder isn't a crime, cos no one actually died. What does Judge Napolitano know about the law anyways.

They lied true, I give you that. I think they lied cuz dipshits will take any Russian connection as a sign of collusion. Unfortunate, it shouldn't have happened. If only we had less pieces of shit pushing it.

Originally posted by Surtur
They lied true, I give you that. I think they lied cuz dipshits will take any Russian connection as a sign of collusion. Unfortunate, it shouldn't have happened. If only we had less pieces of shit pushing it.

No, they were told flat out that the information being offered at the meeting was part of an initiative by the Russian government to elect Trump, and Trump Jr. literally said, "I love it."

So it is collusion, full stop. They said so in black and white. It's not even in dispute.

Originally posted by Surtur
They lied true, I give you that. I think they lied cuz dipshits will take any Russian connection as a sign of collusion. Unfortunate, it shouldn't have happened. If only we had less pieces of shit pushing it.

And they set up the meeting and they went to said meeting under the premise that they would be working with the Russian government. Ignoring this won't make it go away.

But kudos on acknowledging that Junior and co at least lied. Hilarious that you even blame-shift the fault for those lies to others though.

Hilarious, all the Trump people have all agreed to testify. The Pro Russian lobbyst and anti Trump chair of Fusion GPS Russian dossier funderwont testify. What does he have to hide?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/21/co-founder-firm-behind-trump-russia-dossier-to-plead-fifth.html

The only thing the Left tried to hide now is the actual TRUTH!

Which I will point out in my New Children's Book "The Little Leftists that cried Russians"

Originally posted by Sable
Hilarious, all the Trump people have all agreed to testify. The Pro Russian lobbyst and anti Trump chair of Fusion GPS Russian dossier funderwont testify. What does he have to hide?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/21/co-founder-firm-behind-trump-russia-dossier-to-plead-fifth.html

Trump Jr. and Manafort reach deal with Senate panel to avoid public hearing

The leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee have cut a deal with President Donald Trump's eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., and former campaign chairman Paul Manafort to avoid being subpoenaed for a high-profile public hearing next week, with the two men agreeing to provide records to the panel and to be privately interviewed ahead of any public session. -snip

Link

What were saying about having something to hide because you won't testify? "Hilarious" indeed.

Now you are strawmaning. Where does it say they are not testifying?

Originally posted by Sable
Hilarious, all the Trump people have all agreed to testify. The Pro Russian lobbyst and anti Trump chair of Fusion GPS Russian dossier funderwont testify. What does he have to hide?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/21/co-founder-firm-behind-trump-russia-dossier-to-plead-fifth.html

If they've cutting deals to avoid a subpoena, it's because they're dodging testifying. That's the point of dodging a subpoena.

Thats not what it says. They both agreed to testify, why are you being selective with the truth? Simpson dodged the subpoena, but I see you dont care about actual collusion.

In private, not publicly and ahead (ie being warned) of a public hearings. But sure, looks like I stepped over the line a bit there in my initial comment. My error.

What is the "actual collusion" again? Does it have to do with Clinton or Obama, hard to keep track as it keeps flipping?

So it only counts if its in public and shady if in private, are you implying this?

There is more evidence of collusion on the left, then a meeting with a Russian ambassador whom Obama State Dep set up. And a Russian adoption lawyer. Whom Obama admin Lynch and Johnson let in under extraordinary circumstances on parole with an expired visa.

So Obama's colluding. Got it.

You dont find it odd, Obama set up that meeting with Sessions and Kissliac? Im not saying he intended to cause ill will. Im saying his admin orchestrated it, back when there was no Russian fever. Now anything Russian is suspect to the left. All this sfuff was cleared by his admin and set up by his admin, why is the meeting only suspect now?

Why wasnt it front page news when the meeting was set up, surely the stated department records were not secret. Why wasnt the headline when it happened anywhere "Obama State Dept sets up meeting between Sessions and Russians" as part of his foreign policy and Russian reset.

You know why it wasnt? Cause nobody cared about Russsia then, Hillary was assumed the winner, and all was well.

Originally posted by Robtard
So Obama's colluding. Got it.

Is it "collusion" only if it happened during the election? If so, then, yes, you're right: it wasn't collusion because he was president.

Or its not "COLLUSION" if the Democrats do it....cause...REASONS!