satanic bible? satanic church? The devil exists?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Then you are failing spectacularly.

You could not be more wrong.

Because it is quadruple-spaced scriptural rambling.

No, you have had one-sided conversations here. You are so interested in converting people, that you do not actually listen to them.

When a normal person does not like how he is being responded to, he considers what it is that he is doing that people are responding to him this way, and adjusts his behavior accordingly. However, that requires an honest self-assessment, self-reflection, and introspection. Knowing you, you will consider it being persecuted for your faith, or the natural response of sinners to biblical truth, and double-down on self-righteousness.

Case in point:

Question: do you believe that Jesus walked in love, and everything that He said to people was loving and kind?

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Question: do you believe that Jesus walked in love, and everything that He said to people was loving and kind?

I do not believe Jesus existed.

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Yes, you are imposing because I didn't ask you to send me a [b]private message, let alone one in Latin.[/B]

Great, and you're imposing your limited, narrow-minded religious point of views on this entire forum. So that's technically harassment as well. Pleaase stop.

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
I know that I'm not dumb, so why would I feel like it you imposter?

You can never convince an idiot that he's an idiot, anyways.

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
You see, [b]real, true believers don't antagonize their brothers and sisters in Christ. But ever since you showed up in my threads, you have not ceased to irritate, and oppose me, just like an unbeliever. You are a wolf in sheep's clothing, masquerading as a Christian.[/B]

Then why are you antagonizing me -- a fellow Christian? My point isn't to irritate, it's to offer a new point of view on your misinterpretation of outdated text.

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Religious school?

No person needs to go to "religious school" to get saved, and go to Heaven, or to learn Latin (which isn't necessary to understand the Bible).

Yes. There are educational institutions specifically designed for someone to better interpret and understand the Bible. And it's mandatory to learn basic Latin. Honestly, if you've never been in such a school then you're just spewing your own misbegotten lunacy on this board and then say how you are the only one who properly understands the Bible.

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Yes, satanically-inspired.

How do you know it's satanically inspired? It usually portrays Satan-worshippers as villains. 👆

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
No, because [b]secular facts explode your unproven claims. [/B]

Eh? Secular facts? According to whom...? You?

Originally posted by MythLord
Eh? Secular facts? According to whom...? You?

No, there are no secular facts. Just facts. There is not one reality for religious people, and another for everyone else. As much as he would like there to be, so he does not have to deal with inconvenient truths.

Jesus why did the Latin seem to anger you? Are you possessed by a demon? Did the image trigger the demon? Maybe you are the devil here to tempt us all.

Lol no I'm just kidding, your God isn't real.

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Question: do you believe that Jesus walked in love, and everything that He said to people was loving and kind?

I believe he walked in...

( •_•)

( •_•)>⌐■-■

(⌐■_&#9632😉

sandals.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I do not believe Jesus existed.

Originally posted by Surtur
Jesus why did the Latin seem to anger you? Are you possessed by a demon? Did the image trigger the demon? Maybe you are the devil here to tempt us all.

Lol no I'm just kidding, your God isn't real.

Jesus?

Are you Sur, or Surtur?

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Jesus?

Are you Sur, or Surtur?

He's Sure-tur!

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Jesus?

Are you Sur, or Surtur?

You seem really hung up on the fact that I abbreviate your name. I bet the real Jesus wouldn't care if I called him Jes. Don't you wanna be like the real J?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Do you honestly think you are reaching anyone for Christ with any of this?

I myself am wary of J.L.Y.

However, I'm wary because I know that, historically, far more people view KMC than ever wind up posting here. I myself have found myself posting in threads that had been abandoned. After engaging in debate for a time, I found the viewership increased several fold:

Today you are unlikely to see such viewership numbers, and not merely because interest in KMC is some fraction of what it once was.
The reality is that the board has largely stripped away the view count feature. Now you can visit threads even with dozens of people replying and the view count displays zero, as if not even the people posting replies to the thread could see what they were doing.

The danger is not that J.L.Y. will not find an audience, but that his message may not be 100% correct. The biggest danger to Christianity, after all, is not obviously-identifiable Satanism. Religion that very closely resembles true Christianity but is not, THAT is the far graver concern.

Perhaps when more time permits I'll be able to share the full range of my concerns. I DO commend J.L.Y. for, overall, handling the unwarranted, against-forum-rules trolling and abuse many of you are trying to hand him.
One poster in particular is all of 16 years old and trying everything he can to get J.L.Y.'s goat. Yet J.L.Y. has generally been civil and held his composure.
That can't be all that easy.

Unless he is staging on a level I have not seen before, unless this is some elaborate, as-yet-unrevealed hoaxing ... J.L.Y. has my respect.

Indeed, and that is the weird thing isn't it? We have WAY more guests browsing than actual members. What are they reading?

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
There's more or less unanimous agreement between historians that Jesus did indeed exist. Of course, there's almost certainly a significant difference between the historical Jesus and the biblical one.

Many historians accept that Jesus may have existed, because the historical standard is fairly low. It effectively amounts to, if a historical text purports that someone existed, then that person likely existed. The problem is that there is no extra-biblical evidence that Jesus existed, and the New Testament accounts are non-contemporaneous. There is simply no reason to believe it is true.

Originally posted by bluewaterrider
I DO commend J.L.Y. for, overall, handling the unwarranted, against-forum-rules trolling and abuse many of you are trying to hand him.
One poster in particular is all of 16 years old and trying everything he can to get J.L.Y.'s goat. Yet J.L.Y. has generally been civil and held his composure.
That can't be all that easy.

Unless he is staging on a level I have not seen before, unless this is some elaborate, as-yet-unrevealed hoaxing ... J.L.Y. has my respect.

He spams the Religion Forum with scripture, and preaches into the void. He is not interested in having a real discussion with anyone, he is creating opportunities to assert his self-righteousness to others. He is getting in-kind what he is putting out, so pardon the rest of us if we do not feel the least bit sorry for him. Maybe instead of giving him your respect, you should reach out to your Christian brother and give him some correction.

Originally posted by Surtur
You seem really hung up on the fact that I abbreviate your name. I bet the real Jesus wouldn't care if I called him Jes. Don't you wanna be like the real J?

Hung up?

I don't understand why you call me Jesus. I don't call you Sur.

Just call me by my forum name the same way I call you by yours.

Is that impossible for you?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Many historians accept that Jesus may have existed, because the historical standard is fairly low. It effectively amounts to, if a historical text purports that someone existed, then that person likely existed. The problem is that there is no extra-biblical evidence that Jesus existed, and the New Testament accounts are non-contemporaneous. There is simply no reason to believe it is true.

There is extra-biblical evidence for the Lord Jesus. But like I have told you before, you refuse to click on my links.

Extra-Biblical Historical Evidence for the LIFE, DEATH, and RESURRECTION of JESUS
ANCIENT NON-CHRISTIAN SOURCES

Click http://www.westarkchurchofchrist.org/library/extrabiblical.htm

What are you afraid of, the Truth?

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Hung up?

I don't understand why you call me Jesus. I don't call you Sur.

Just call me by my forum name the same way I call you by yours.

Is that impossible for you?

What do you think Jesus would do if he found two of the Apostles butt sexing each other? Do you feel there would be anger, jealousy, or both?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
He spams the Religion Forum with scripture, and preaches into the void. He is not interested in having a real discussion with anyone, he is creating opportunities to assert his self-righteousness to others. He is getting in-kind what he is putting out, so pardon the rest of us if we do not feel the least bit sorry for him. Maybe instead of giving him your respect, you should reach out to your Christian brother and give him some correction.

You are a liar just like your father the devil, and the biggest hypocrite on this forum.

You accuse me of spamming with Scripture, but most of my posts don’t have Scripture.

The Truth is you spam this forum with numerous, immature, puerile, unwarranted, non-responsive, animated gifs and memes that some might consider to be Christianphobic, Godphobic, Jesusphobic, and/or Christianityphobic—and you do this with impunity. And you have the nerve to tell me that I don’t want a real discussion with anyone, accusing me of asserting self-righteousness to others. It is you who are self-righteous hypocrite. I have admitted that we are saved by grace through faith, and not by our works (i.e. good deeds).

I am getting in-kind what I put out? 😆

That’s hilarious, because I don’t feel that way at all. You are trying to feel for me—what I don’t feel. In fact, I feel that I am being treated fine, outside of the hypocrisy coming from you, and the few sympathizers that you have.

“…rest of us….” 😆

You are desperate for more sympathizers, and you are desperately trying to “foment” others on here concerning something that doesn’t exist—except maybe in your head.

“…correction….” 😆

You really are desperate for sympathy.

Working that bold font overtime I see. Nice.

Originally posted by bluewaterrider
I myself am wary of J.L.Y.

However, I'm wary because I know that, historically, far more people view KMC than ever wind up posting here. I myself have found myself posting in threads that had been abandoned. After engaging in debate for a time, I found the viewership increased several fold:

Today you are unlikely to see such viewership numbers, and not merely because interest in KMC is some fraction of what it once was.
The reality is that the board has largely stripped away the view count feature. Now you can visit threads even with dozens of people replying and the view count displays zero, as if not even the people posting replies to the thread could see what they were doing.

The danger is not that J.L.Y. will not find an audience, but that his message may not be 100% correct. The biggest danger to Christianity, after all, is not obviously-identifiable Satanism. Religion that very closely resembles true Christianity but is not, THAT is the far graver concern.

Perhaps when more time permits I'll be able to share the full range of my concerns. I DO commend J.L.Y. for, overall, handling the unwarranted, against-forum-rules trolling and abuse many of you are trying to hand him.
One poster in particular is all of 16 years old and trying everything he can to get J.L.Y.'s goat. Yet J.L.Y. has generally been civil and held his composure.
That can't be all that easy.

Unless he is staging on a level I have not seen before, unless this is some elaborate, as-yet-unrevealed hoaxing ... J.L.Y. has my respect.