Loretta Lynch uses Alias in Emails

Precious testomony by her under oath said she did no such thing.

Elizabeth Carlisle

Originally posted by Sable
Precious testomony

?

No doubt there is a perfectly logical reason over this.

Of coarse, to avoid the government records act and potential FISA requests.

People at the NYT and Washington Post had to be forced to cover the tarmac meeting lol.

I wonder if they would need to be forced to cover an equivalent story about Republicans? Why do I get the feeling they wouldn't?

They were forced?

Originally posted by Sable
They were forced?

Yep, weird right?

Revealed: NYT, WaPo reporters didn’t want to cover Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting, forced to by bosses

Now why wouldn't they want to do this? It's not like there wasn't anything to the story, so they certainly can't use that excuse and that it wasn't newsworthy.

So why? Unless they just wanted to protect Lynch and by extension Hilary Clinton.

so the nyt forced the nyt to post a story. i am SO outraged right now. HARUMPH!

Originally posted by Surtur
Yep, weird right?

Revealed: NYT, WaPo reporters didn’t want to cover Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting, forced to by bosses

Now why wouldn't they want to do this? It's not like there wasn't anything to the story, so they certainly can't use that excuse and that it wasn't newsworthy.

So why? Unless they just wanted to protect Lynch and by extension Hilary Clinton.

Brings me to this, did you know he official story was they talked about grandkids, but the report that was just released of there conversation has pages and pages of redacted and blacked out information?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
so the nyt forced the nyt to post a story. i am SO outraged right now. HARUMPH!

Ah yes, you are stupid enough to not see the distinction. The reporters didn't want to report on it and had to be pressed into doing so by their editors.

Would they need to be pressed into doing a negative story about Trump or Republicans, do you think?

Originally posted by Sable
Brings me to this, did you know he official story was they talked about grandkids, but the report that was just released of there conversation has pages and pages of redacted and blacked out information?

Indeed AND the FBI on the scene told people they couldn't get close or take pictures or have cell phones out, etc. All for a discussion about grand kids.

I'd wonder if the have ever heard of email, but we know one Clinton has 🙂

Originally posted by Surtur
Ah yes, you are stupid enough to not see the distinction. The reporters didn't want to report on it and had to be pressed into doing so by their editors.

Would they need to be pressed into doing a negative story about Trump or Republicans, do you think?

so in the case of NYT exclusively, we have to judge them by specific underling reporters and not their editors and bosses, because feefees.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
so in the case of NYT exclusively, we have to judge them by specific underling reporters and not their editors and bosses, because feefees.

I'm wondering why they needed to be pressed into covering a legitimate story?

But then, the Times is known for their bullshit. Just pulled some bullshit with lies about Dennis Prager lol.

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm wondering why they needed to be pressed into covering a legitimate story?

But then, the Times is known for their bullshit. Just pulled some bullshit with lies about Dennis Prager lol.

nah

Yeah, they did. Flat out lied about him, lol. It was funny.

Got a link?

so they let an inaccuracy go to print and did not retract/correct? that's ****ed, man. i'd ask for evidence but i know i'd just receive more feelz posts with nothing said.

Are you surprised? Government is corrupt and politicians get away with it.