Loretta Lynch uses Alias in Emails

Started by Bashar Teg2 pages
Originally posted by Sable

yeah, keep obsessing over me. whatever you need to do to make the headaches subside.

I haven't had a headache in years, I know you have though, everyday when you wake up😂

even if i was a drunk, alcoholism can be fixed. irreparable brain damage however...not so much.

Originally posted by Sable
Got a link?

Oh yes, get ready for the hilarious spins we will see from leftists over this:

Santa Monica Symphony Roiled by Conservative Guest Conductor

So we have this comment:

"But that decision caused immediate outrage among some members of the symphony, and a number of them are refusing to play the fund-raiser, saying that allowing the orchestra to be conducted by Mr. Prager, who has suggested that same-sex marriage would lead to polygamy and incest, among other contentious statements"

So Prager never said that thing they just said lol. He never said it would lead to incest and all that shit, he made a LEGAL argument about it. So, the Times probably just wasn't aware, right? I mean there is no actual quote from him, no link to it. They must not know. Oh shit wait, further on in the article:

"In 2014, he wrote that the “heterosexual AIDS” crisis was something “entirely manufactured by the Left.” That same year, Mr. Prager suggested that if same-sex marriage were legalized, then “there is no plausible argument for denying polygamous relationships, or brothers and sisters, or parents and adult children, the right to marry.”

Oh shit wait, they DO know he was making a legal argument. Also you can't see it because I copy and pasted, but in the article, the above? There is a link lol. There is a link to him making the legal argument, they provided that. For the BS claim he said this would lead to incest? No proof.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
even if i was a drunk, that could be fixed. irreparable brain damage however...not so much.

No clue what you are even talking about. A person with irreparable brain damage usually dies, or cannot, talk, type, write, eat, or do much of anything. Most likely they would be in a coma and on life support. I like how you keep trying to do this thing "you have brain damage." While never even being able to back up any claim you have.

that's cool, but don't forget to wear your helmet. 👆

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
that's cool, but don't forget to wear your helmet. 👆

Dont forget to drink some more, to fabricate some more lies, 😛🙂

p.s. Stop abusing animals by with your un responsible behavior at home.

Originally posted by Sable
Dont forget to drink some more, to fabricate some more lies, P🙂

p.s. Stop abusing animals by with your un responsible behavior at home.

oh look, the brain damaged retard is still trying to frighten me by threatening to post my name. such a scary retard.

I guess you don't know what that means, retard😛

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
oh look, the brain damaged retard is still trying to frighten me by threatening to post my name. such a scary retard.

Triggered😂

that's nice. have fun obsessing over me and good luck with your brain damage. 👆

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
that's nice. have fun obsessing over me and good luck with your brain damage. 👆

#triggeredretard 😛

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
so they let an inaccuracy go to print and did not retract/correct? that's ****ed, man. i'd ask for evidence but i know i'd just receive more feelz posts with nothing said.

Eh, you are kind of correct, but not really. Being fair to them, the article is from yesterday. There is room to make a timely correction. However, why would they? I posted you the evidence you were curious about. They claim he said something, but do not provide a specific quote or source and then several paragraphs later provide the *actual* quote and the actual source. Except, the actual quote with evidence provided is nothing like what they claimed he said earlier in the article.

It's not like two different people wrote the article, so I expect the person who wrote it knew exactly what he/she was doing.

Originally posted by Surtur
Oh yes, get ready for the hilarious spins we will see from leftists over this:

Santa Monica Symphony Roiled by Conservative Guest Conductor

So we have this comment:

[b]"But that decision caused immediate outrage among some members of the symphony, and a number of them are refusing to play the fund-raiser, saying that allowing the orchestra to be conducted by Mr. Prager, who has suggested that same-sex marriage would lead to polygamy and incest, among other contentious statements"

So Prager never said that thing they just said lol. He never said it would lead to incest and all that shit, he made a LEGAL argument about it. So, the Times probably just wasn't aware, right? I mean there is no actual quote from him, no link to it. They must not know. Oh shit wait, further on in the article:

"In 2014, he wrote that the “heterosexual AIDS” crisis was something “entirely manufactured by the Left.” That same year, Mr. Prager suggested that if same-sex marriage were legalized, then “there is no plausible argument for denying polygamous relationships, or brothers and sisters, or parents and adult children, the right to marry.”

Oh shit wait, they DO know he was making a legal argument. Also you can't see it because I copy and pasted, but in the article, the above? There is a link lol. There is a link to him making the legal argument, they provided that. For the BS claim he said this would lead to incest? No proof. [/B]

Well here is the evidence you claimed would never be given Bash lol. I notice you didn't have anything to say about it once it was provided.