Mcmaster has to use bullet points for idiot Trump

Originally posted by Surtur
Speaking of people at the NYT not drinking the kool aid, this is hilarious:

Tom Friedman Has a Stopped Clock Moment

The points he makes that will no doubt be ignored by leftist cucks:

[b]" We can’t take in every immigrant who wants to come here; we need, metaphorically speaking, a high wall that assures Americans we can control our border with a big gate that lets as many people in legally as we can effectively absorb as citizens.

• The Muslim world does have a problem with pluralism — gender pluralism, religious pluralism and intellectual pluralism — and suggesting that terrorism has nothing to do with that fact is naïve; countering violent extremism means constructively engaging with Muslim leaders on this issue.

• Americans want a president focused on growing the economic pie, not just redistributing it. We do have a trade problem with China, which has reformed and closed instead of reformed and opened. We have an even bigger problem with automation wiping out middle-skilled work and we need to generate more blue-collar jobs to anchor communities.

• Political correctness on college campuses has run ridiculously riot. Americans want leaders to be comfortable expressing patriotism and love of country when globalization is erasing national identities. America is not perfect, but it is, more often than not, a force for good in the world." [/B]

These are the reasons democrats keep losing elections.

The Muslim thing will set them off. They just can't admit the terror attacks have to do with Islam. They want to blame the USA, poverty, politics, etc.

The Democrats will never ever admit those points. I'm curious if there are any leftists who think these points do not need to be acknowledged.

Originally posted by Sable
These are the reasons democrats keep losing elections.

Huh? Looked it up again, 15 Dem Presidents and 19 Republican presidents. So it's not like it's a sweep to the Right.

Last 100 years it's 8 Dems and 10 Reps, so again, not really a sweep. Should note that one of those ten was Nixon, who had to resign in complete and utter disgrace, not a good time for the Republicans, more like a black-eye on their record. Do wonder if we'll have a repeat of that with Trump.

Originally posted by Sable
These are the reasons democrats keep losing elections.

Anyways, read this:

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/08/dhs-magical-mystery-tour-doing-the-work-the-star-tribune-wont-do-2.php

I can't figure out why such tours would be given.

Originally posted by Robtard
Huh? Looked it up again, 15 Dem Presidents and 19 Republican presidents. So it's not like it's a sweep to the Right.

Last 100 years it's 8 Dems and 10 Reps, so again, not really a sweep. Should note that one of those ten was Nixon, who had to resign in complete and utter disgrace, not a good time for the Republicans, more like a black-eye on their record. Do wonder if we'll have a repeat of that with Trump.

Do Democrats need to acknowledge the points presented? No, right?

Originally posted by Surtur
Do Democrats need to acknowledge the points presented? No, right?

Huh? Not sure what you're talking about, clearly nothing in regards to what I posted, which was about Presidents in general and then Trump.

Originally posted by Robtard
Huh? Not sure what you're talking about, clearly nothing in regards to what I posted, which was about Presidents in general and then Trump.

I am talking about the post I made. You know, you quoted Sable who was literally replying to the post I made?

It's at the top of the page. I will ask again: these points, need Dems acknowledge them? I'd say yes, which is precisely why I think you'll say no.

Sorry, I didn't read your post. Hope that doesn't hurt your feelings too much.

Sable made a comment about Dems not being able to win; when the Dem to Rep win/lose really isn't that far off, which is why I found it odd and replied too that

Originally posted by Robtard
Sorry, I didn't read your post. Hope that doesn't hurt your feelings too much.

Sable made a comment about Dems not being able to win; when the Dem to Rep win/lose really isn't that far off, which is why I found it odd and replied too that

So you whined about his comment without even bothering to read what made him say it?

Actually yeah, that doesn't surprise me.

I see, you're lashing out in a fit of bitter rage because I didn't read whatever post of yours.

His comment can stand alone though, for reasons noted. Be less angry.

Originally posted by Robtard
I see, you're lashing out in a fit of bitter rage because I didn't read whatever post of yours.

If this is what you need to tell yourself.

His comment can stand alone though, for reasons noted. Be less angry.

Would have been helpful to see what caused him to say it, but meh you won't ever admit it.

I will ask again, now that you know what post I meant, do Democrats need to acknowledge those points? Will you dare to use common sense and say yes?

Wait, you think I went back and read your post now? 😂

Originally posted by Robtard
Wait, you think I went back and read your post now? 😂

If not you can read it now. Nothing to fear.

Or hey maybe there is something to fear. Prove it by not reading it.

Originally posted by Surtur
If not you can read it now. Nothing to fear.

Or hey maybe there is something to fear. Prove it by not reading it.

^ Oh, look. Surtur's clever mind games.

Originally posted by Robtard
^ Oh, look. Surtur's clever mind games.

If you're a coward it's okay. Just best not to be whining in other topics and calling people cowards, you understand?

IOW: "If you don't read my post and satisfy my obsessiveness you're a coward!"

😂

Originally posted by Robtard
IOW: "If you don't read my post and satisfy my obsessiveness you're a coward!"

😂

Nope, just don't be a pussy and then call others pussies.

You too stupid to get that?

Lol, he most definitely upset now. "YOU DIDN'T READ MY POST!!!!1!"

Originally posted by Robtard
Lol, he most definitely upset now. "YOU DIDN'T READ MY POST!!!!1!"

If this qualifies as upset this means your butt buddy had a meltdown today due to Sable.

So a yay or nay on that? Up to you.

You're going to have to be more clear, as you're claimed 4-5 different people as my 'butt buddies', sport.

ps Do you like thinking about 'butt buddies'? You say that a lot; it's been noticed.