Originally posted by Bashar Teg
okay, so you have no evidence of them burning buildings, burning cars, or destroying storefronts as you claimed. all you have is an opinion piece from WaPo which contains no evidence of what you claimed.
Listen, every time a window is broken or a car is burned, it's the god damn "Antifa!"; everybody knows this you idiot.
ummmm, wtf site is that? can't even find a bias/ fact check for it. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/?s="the+last+american+vagabond"
so i guess if someone typed it on the internet, and you like it, then it's true. any more activist blog "proof"?
Originally posted by Surtur
No, it's just if it's morons dressed in all black showing up to do it.
"Dressed in all black" you say. Um, the person in the pic on the story you posted hitting a window is wearing a navy blue hoodie, you can tell it's navy blue and not black because the hoodie contrast with his black pants.
So what's your next "It's Antfa!" trick?
Originally posted by Robtard
It's Navy Blue. That's a color and it's not black
Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
No, this is navy blue. What the person smashing the window is wearing is basically one shade away from being completely black.
Navy blue can vary on the color scale. That's on the lighter side of the shade; while his is on the darker
Look at his pants, gloves, backpack and helmet, those are black and you can see a clear contrast of colors. I had a hoodie in that same shade of navy blue and I have a Peacoat in the same color/shade
Originally posted by Robtard
Navy blue can vary on the color scale. That's on the lighter side of the shade.Look at his pants, gloves, backpack and helmet, those are black and you can see a clear contrast of colors. I had a hoodie in that same shade of navy blue and I have a Peacoat in the same color/shade
Yeah, his hoodie is a slightly lighter shade of black than his pants. Couldn't even tell at a glance.