North Korea claims it has a hydrogen bomb

Started by Surtur4 pages
Originally posted by Robtard
For starters, stop making empty threats. That serves no purpose but to make himself and America look weak and childish. If you threaten "fire and fury" and then tuck tail, it looks poorly.

Also Rob, you say here what you feel Trump should not say, but what do you think he should be saying? If you think Kim would be set off enough to fire off nukes due to some tough talk, what words do you think will stop him from utilizing nuclear weapons?

Would you agree someone who would use nukes like that is pretty much just looking for any excuse to use them?

You're comparing a country testing a possible H-bomb with a country's will to actually use one, randomly no less. That's stupid and retarded, as many countries have tested nukes, but only one has actually used one offensively.

So your scare-tactic based premise is laughable and can be dismissed.

As far as what Trump should say? Don't really know, but I also didn't run for president claiming I had all the answers. But considering he's claimed to be the greatest negotiator and deal maker, he should negotiate with NK. Set up a trade deal with them, that way they're buying our shit and not China's for a start.

So do most people think

1. Nothing will happen
2. War will happen

Originally posted by TethAdamTheRock
So do most people think

1. Nothing will happen
2. War will happen

Trump's going to have to concede to NK and condone that they're going to be a true nuclear power in the region, which will mean SK might get nukes and we'll have another Pakistan/India nuke dick waving contest. That is if NK can get them before 2021.

What will be funny, all the "fire and fury" Trumpers will fall in line and applaud Trump's move, when previously they wanted NK's heartblood.

^ so for now you think all will happen is just empty threats about attacks

Originally posted by TethAdamTheRock
^ so for now you think all will happen is just empty threats about attacks
Kim is a billionaire with nigh absolute control of a country where he gets to have orgies, watch movies and eat sushi all day, do you think he's going to risk losing that and his life just to nuke Guam? His power rest on his ability to talk tough, look tough and to now one-up Trump since Trump like a retard has decided to play into his dictator micro-penis waving games.

What about us attacking them

Originally posted by TethAdamTheRock
What about us attacking them

That's the problem. Trump can't declare war, but he could order a missile strike which would likely push Kim to retaliate or look weak and then we have a possible war.

So in other words. We "The U.S" should take a play from the Obama Presidency and CUCK!

You first Robbie.

Originally posted by Robtard
Going to get pretty weird if we dismiss Trump's belligerent comments that can have real world issues under "it's his freedom of speech to say whatever he wants" reasoning. Pretty sure he's having to deal with NK's missile and bomb test.

You misunderstood me, he isn't having to deal with what he said. Its not like people rational people are going around saying "Well Trump said he would nuke them, why hasn't he." its not like he's constantly being asked in the media "Why hasn't Trump nuked them."

Originally posted by Robtard
Trump's going to have to concede to NK and condone that they're going to be a true nuclear power in the region, which will mean SK might get nukes and we'll have another Pakistan/India nuke dick waving contest. That is if NK can get them before 2021.

What will be funny, all the "fire and fury" Trumpers will fall in line and applaud Trump's move, when previously they wanted NK's heartblood.

Susan Rice is really the one who has already conceded to them.

North Korea do not have an H Bomb

But Little Kimmy is still Da Bomb ...right?

Originally posted by Robtard
That's the problem. Trump can't declare war, but he could order a missile strike which would likely push Kim to retaliate or look weak and then we have a possible war.

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke

Keep in mind that it was due to complete inaction on the part of Obama administration that led to North Korea becoming a nuclear power and advancing its delivery platforms.

Unfortunately, Obama administration saw in Libya a greater threat - height of stupidity.

The Left would do something about Little Kimmy but they are too busy fighting Real Evil... Like Confederate Statues....Those things can trigger ya!!!!!

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
[I]

Keep in mind that it was due to complete inaction on the part of Obama administration that led to North Korea becoming a nuclear power and advancing its delivery platforms.

Except for the fact that their first successful test was in 2006 after sanctions were reimplemented in 2002. Both under Bush.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Kim [/B]

biggest troll on the planet

Originally posted by TethAdamTheRock
^ so for now you think all will happen is just empty threats about attacks
As I said in the other NK thread, there's the precedent this sets to truly worry about. Whether or not Kim is crazy enough to use his nukes, which he most likely(and hopefully) isn't, allowing that kind of belligerent rogue dictatorship to become a nuclear power is a pretty big geopolitical L for the United States and the west in general. The implications extend beyond the immediate region, as well. Iran will be sure to follow. The left's all-too-causal attitude about this precedent is pretty remarkable since they were historically the ones who were the strongest opponents to nuclear proliferation in general when it was between the United States and the Soviet Union. It seems as if everyone is now completely buying into the assumption that nuclear weapons are only for show. Let's hope that assumption is correct.

Originally posted by shiv
biggest troll on the planet

Hey! I called Him "LITTLE KIMMY" !!!!! Don't pull a Bashy.
Quote people Right!