RotJ Luke vs Rebels Ahsoka

Started by Kurk3 pages

RotJ Luke vs Rebels Ahsoka

All Out fight

Do the feminists win this one?

Fight takes place in the jedi-temple archives

Sadly, the feminists do win this one. The woman narrowly beats the boy

Luke outright admitted Vader would stomp him if Vader was trying to kill him, but then again, ROTJ Vader is>>Rebels Vader.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Luke outright admitted Vader would stomp him if Vader was trying to kill him, but then again, ROTJ Vader is>>Rebels Vader.

That's all Legends.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
That's all Legends.

is this canon only? In that case, I guess Luke

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
is this canon only?

I thought that's the default. Unless specifically mentioning someone from Legends only like Revan or Starkiller.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
I thought that's the default. Unless specifically mentioning someone from Legends only like Revan or Starkiller.

Nobody in the forum seems to care aside from a handful of exceptions tbh.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Nobody in the forum seems to care aside from a handful of exceptions tbh.

They need to start adapting. In any case when talking about characters like Rebels Ashoka they have no place on Legends.

Since Canon has Luke tripping over his own two feet and doubts himself....for whatever reason. Can't really see him win this.

So Disney SJW Canon: Luke loses for being an insecure male

Originally posted by Zenwolf
Since Canon has Luke tripping over his own two feet and doubts himself....for whatever reason. Can't really see him win this.

Did Luke not outright stalemate vader in canon?

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Did Luke not outright stalemate vader in canon?

A conflicted Vader it seems. But even still all his other showings thus far in Canon haven't been really great aside from like a couple of instances. The current SW comic series from what I've read, Luke doubts his abilities in being a Jedi and all sorts of other nonsense. Which I don't really get, he blew up the Death Star, he should be walking tall with confidence.

Originally posted by Zenwolf
A conflicted Vader it seems. But even still all his other showings thus far in Canon haven't been really great aside from like a couple of instances. The current SW comic series from what I've read, Luke doubts his abilities in being a Jedi and all sorts of other nonsense.

that's a pre-prime luke though.

And regarding Vader, Luke was hindered too. Not to mention the Vader in ROTJ is likely better than the one who beat and is holistically superior to Ahoska in rebels.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
that's a pre-prime luke though.

And regarding Vader, Luke was hindered too. Not to mentionthe Vader in ROTJ is likely better than the one who beat and is holistically superior to Ahoska in rebels.

Yeah but that's all we have for Luke up to Rotj. As far as combat goes against Force Users.

How was Luke hindered? I mean yeah he didn't want to kill him, but how does that say anything? Likely better, how so? Proof?

Originally posted by Zenwolf
Yeah but that's all we have for Luke up to Rotj. As far as combat goes against Force Users.
]

So then, why don't we take what happened regarding the version of Luke in this thread rather than the pre-prime version of him?
Originally posted by Zenwolf
How was Luke hindered? I mean yeah he didn't want to kill him,

Not wanting to fight Vader would hinder him I'd imagine.
Originally posted by Zenwolf
but how does that say anything? Likely better, how so? Proof? [/B]

Well, given that Ben Kenobi deepened his connection to the force and improved as a swordsman despite rotting in exile. I'd imagine Vader, who was active in shutting down the rebellion would be capable of growing.

There's also Vader stating in a vision that he became more powerful with every step he took away from Kenobi(this is after killing him).

The quote about him being in his prime per rebels is talking about Vader's hatred and given the context of the quote mentions this only changes when Luke redeems him, this would apply to vader with the exception of when Luke is exploiting his conflict to make him good.

Canon or Legends, Luke wrecks by virtue of being able to contend with ROTJ Vader (saber-wise, that is). Force-wise, Ahsoka has the advantage in Canon, but it is not enough to make up for the pretty wide saber gap.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
So then, why don't we take what happened regarding the version of Luke in this thread rather than the pre-prime version of him?

Not wanting to fight Vader would hinder him I'd imagine.

Well, given that Ben Kenobi deepened his connection to the force and improved as a swordsman despite rotting in exile. I'd imagine Vader, who was active in shutting down the rebellion would be capable of growing.

There's also Vader stating in a vision that he became more powerful with every step he took away from Kenobi(this is after killing him).

The quote about him being in his prime per rebels is talking about Vader's hatred and given the context of the quote mentions this only changes when Luke redeems him, this would apply to vader with the exception of when Luke is exploiting his conflict to make him good.

Because there's nothing really for Rotj Luke as far as what he has done, anything else is speculation . But you're really gonna go with a Luke fighting a hindered Vader over Ashoka who was fighting a Vader that was wanting her dead?

Ok I guess. I'd probably agree if they had more to show near the timeframe.

I recall that when he discovers Luke, not after he dies.

Originally posted by Zenwolf
[B]Because there's nothing really for Rotj Luke as far as what he has done, anything else is speculation . But you're really gonna go with a Luke fighting a hindered Vader over Ashoka who was fighting a Vader that was wanting her dead?

Like I said, both were hindered. I can reasonably argue that Luke=Vader, I can't argue the same for Ahsoka.
Originally posted by Zenwolf
Ok I guess. I'd probably agree if they had more to show near the timeframe.

It would make it more solid, but based on relevant evidence, the argument for Luke stalemating Vader is more solid than the argument he can't.
Originally posted by Zenwolf
I recall that when he discovers Luke, not after he dies.

True, but I like I said, prime is not referring to Vader's combative power.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Like I said, both were hindered. I can reasonably argue that Luke=Vader, I can't argue the same for Ahsoka.

It would make it more solid, but based on relevant evidence, the argument for Luke stalemating Vader is more solid than the argument he can't.

True, but I like I said, prime is not referring to Vader's combative power.

So you're saying if both weren't hindered than they'd still be on even footing? Because they fought on even footing while hindered? That seems like shaky logic but ok. Though I wouldn't really say Luke was hindered as bad if you wanna go with that.

Didn't you use to say and everyone else, that Vader's prime was Rebels? I miss something?

Originally posted by Rockydonovang

Not wanting to fight Vader would hinder him I'd imagine.

Nah that's the peak state of being a Lightsider in Canon. Ben Kenobi didn't want to fight Maul either, and that was clearly his most enlightened and Peak incarnation.