Four pages and I haven't seem one person mention Mac's little speech from IASIP. Sloppy.
==
But seriously, scientists can be dicks. They can even be wrong. They regularly are, until they all get together, gather evidence, and find the right answer. Which they do. Regularly, on things like climate change, for example.
But no, something something liberal leftists.
Originally posted by Sable
It's more then ome rotten apple. It was a poisen apple to poisen the well. The food pyramid is literally taught in public schools. Educating kids on how to be healthy but masquerading as the complete opposite of how to be healthy.
Our food pyramid is crap because of food lobbyist buying their way in. What does that have to do with anything here?
Originally posted by Sable
I believe in real science, not science of fear.People wouldn't care about hurricanes if they never hit land. Cause it didn't doesn't affect them.
Okay, what "real science" is telling you that pollution and climate change is all a hoax?
Originally posted by Sable
I believe in real science, not science of fear.People wouldn't care about hurricanes if they never hit land. Cause it didn't doesn't affect them.
Yet, you'd reject the real science that would explain why someone would care more when massively strong winds and storms are within closer proximity to them.
People like you pick and choose. Using "real" and "science" together should embarrass you.
Originally posted by Robtard
Our food pyramid is crap because of food lobbyist buying their way in. What does that have to do with anything here?Okay, what "real science" is telling you that pollution and climate change is all a hoax?
America pollutes less then any other nation for its size and population. We literally lead the world, yet we constantly need to punish ourselves for some bullshit climate agenda?
I am literally the greenest person on this forum and you can vouch for that, but I don't believe in transferring our wealthy with deals like Paris to reach artificial goals.
"Global sea level has been rising over the past century, and the rate has increased in recent decades. In 2014, global sea level was 2.6 inches above the 1993 average—the highest annual average in the satellite record (1993-present). Sea level continues to rise at a rate of about one-eighth of an inch per year." -snip
Originally posted by -Pr-
Four pages and I haven't seem one person mention Mac's little speech from IASIP. Sloppy.==
But seriously, scientists can be dicks. They can even be wrong. They regularly are, until they all get together, gather evidence, and find the right answer. Which they do. Regularly, on things like climate change, for example.
But no, something something liberal leftists.
My main problem is finding examples of researchers admitting to an institutional problem when it comes to criticising peers.
Essentially, the way it works is everyones concerned with getting funding, and don't want to make an enemy and hurt their chances of being approved..
Which doesn't mean the whole thing should be thrown out, but it definately has issues.
Just look at mental health sciences, and you'll find things that make you wonder if that particular institution is less science, and more cult ala scientology, where nobody ever tells the Emperor they have no clothes on..
Originally posted by Sin I AM
Explain
Freud is one example.. Very authoritarian, refused dispute, and refused to subject himself to psychoanlysis, as he pushed it on all of his proteges or people or interest.
And his disciples continue to directly cite his work decades after his death, or quote each other quoting him, which rarely happens in an evolving science..
Originally posted by Robtard
"Global sea level has been rising over the past century, and the rate has increased in recent decades. In 2014, global sea level was 2.6 inches above the 1993 average—the highest annual average in the satellite record (1993-present). Sea level continues to rise at a rate of about one-eighth of an inch per year." -snip
NOAA was just busted for altering climate data, I take what they say with a grain of salt.
FL is like 3-4 ft above sea level at its lowest points, probably less in some areas, but there is still dry land.
If the sea level really is rising, then why not make mass desal plants, use the water, sell it to nations who need fresh water to pay the cost. America could literally become the fresh water producer of the world.
We could actually pay our debt off by selling fresh water.
Originally posted by cdtm
My main problem is finding examples of researchers admitting to an institutional problem when it comes to criticising peers.Essentially, the way it works is everyones concerned with getting funding, and don't want to make an enemy and hurt their chances of being approved..
Which doesn't mean the whole thing should be thrown out, but it definately has issues.
Just look at mental health sciences, and you'll find things that make you wonder if that particular institution is less science, and more cult ala scientology, where nobody ever tells the Emperor they have no clothes on..
Don't get me started on mental health sciences. Seriously, I take serious issue with a lot of that.
Originally posted by SableIn Europe no reputable Psychiatrist or Psychologist would describe themselves as Freudian... Seriously.
NOAA was just busted for altering climate data, I take what they say with a grain of salt.FL is like 3-4 ft above sea level at its lowest points, probably less in some areas, but there is still dry land.
If the sea level really is rising, then why not make mass desal plants, use the water, sell it to nations who need fresh water to pay the cost. America could literally become the fresh water producer of the world.
We could actually pay our debt off by selling fresh water.
Originally posted by Sin I AM
The irony
Lol, a simple question is not the same as the homework assignment you assigned me. This is some of what you asked:
"Be specific. If you were my patient and walked into my office and wanted to evaluate my abilities provide me with a step-by-step breakdown of how youd do that?"
A step by step break down, lol. The question I asked Rob could be answered with a single sentence.
Originally posted by Sable
NOAA was just busted for altering climate data, I take what they say with a grain of salt.FL is like 3-4 ft above sea level at its lowest points, probably less in some areas, but there is still dry land.
If the sea level really is rising, then why not make mass desal plants, use the water, sell it to nations who need fresh water to pay the cost. America could literally become the fresh water producer of the world.
We could actually pay our debt off by selling fresh water.
Probably another waste of time, but: "NOAA Scientists Falsely Accused of Manipulating Climate Change Data: A tabloid used testimony from a single scientist to paint an excruciatingly technical matter as a worldwide conspiracy." Link
And NASA? Are they liars too?
Okay, the point is the pattern of rise, not that tomorrow Florida will be underwater. This type of 'it's either happened right now, or it's a hoax' mentality is a huge problem
The rest of what you said is just loonier. Desalination plants exist now; they're not dependent on rising sea levels, this has nothing to do with climate change.