Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
In all honesty, I did raise SF Malak above Kun and as a result, now assume the rituals Vitiate carried out on Dromund Kaas raised his power significantly to account for the logical gap that should exist between himself and the liked of Revan and Malak ( even empowered by the Starforge ).
I find myself agreeing with this.
Originally posted by NewGuy01
Reverse scaling isn't a thing, but apparently ignoring sources you don't like is.
Originally posted by NewGuy01
Your set of values is impeccable, Kbro; an uneducated man might think you're just picking and choosing what's convenient for your positions, but we know you'd never do that.
Deciding which evidence we give more weight to is part of debating.
Originally posted by NewGuy01
For example, say I'm on the fence about how impressive defeating a relative unknown like Warb Null is. It's completely logical to find it less impressive because it was done by someone whose defined upper limit is "far inferior to Malak," than if there was no such limitation.
Kun has a variety of feats/hype which marks him as impressive regardless of how he is placed in comparison with Malak, hence if Malak is raised above him, then Mlak, and anyone who scales off Malak is raised as Kun's own hype/feats remains intact.