Clinton opens door to questioning legitimacy of 2016 election
Previously: "Anyone who doesn't accept the election results is a direct threat to our democracy and a sore loser" Hillary Clinton
Clinton opens door to questioning legitimacy of 2016 election
Previously: "Anyone who doesn't accept the election results is a direct threat to our democracy and a sore loser" Hillary Clinton
Umm...The illegitimacy has already been proven. Trumps ridiculous election coverage that got him the presidency was the result of Hillary's "pied piper candidate" scheme. The Left like to ignore this because they don't want to believe Hillary is bad, and the Right like to ignore this because they don't want to admit that Trump was ultimately just a pawn, which is why they also ignore Hillary and Trump's shared Goldman Sachs/Saudi ties.
Originally posted by Thorne
the states with the biggest populations are on the coastsnothing in the middle but farmers and gomers
so why should braindead rednecks decide who is fit to govern when they dont even know any of the issues
Do you not see how your logic can be used against groups on both sides?
Originally posted by Thornelmao!
the states with the biggest populations are on the coastsnothing in the middle but farmers and gomers
so why should braindead rednecks decide who is fit to govern when they dont even know any of the issues
Why should california and new york decide the fate of a continent?
Furthhermore eithout those farms, no economy, dummy.
Originally posted by Sable
LinkPreviously: "Anyone who doesn't accept the election results is a direct threat to our democracy and a sore loser" Hillary Clinton
At least she has been kind enough to admit she is a threat to democracy.
Originally posted by Lestov16
Umm...The illegitimacy has already been proven.
Oh? Where? What is the proof?
Trumps ridiculous election coverage that got him the presidency was the result of Hillary's "pied piper candidate" scheme. The Left like to ignore this because they don't want to believe Hillary is bad, and the Right like to ignore this because they don't want to admit that Trump was ultimately just a pawn, which is why they also ignore Hillary and Trump's shared Goldman Sachs/Saudi ties.
Was this meant to support your claims of illegitimacy? Since it did not do so.
Originally posted by Foxsteak
lmao!Why should california and new york decide the fate of a continent?
Furthhermore eithout those farms, no economy, dummy.
because if you asked any of those farmers about anything political theyd look at you like a dog looking at a rubiks cube
economic slaves shouldnt have the power to influence world politics
Originally posted by Thorne
the states with the biggest populations are on the coastsnothing in the middle but farmers and gomers
so why should braindead rednecks decide who is fit to govern when they dont even know any of the issues
I'll respond to your unfounded assumptions with some of my own:
Because intelligent people are more capable of evil then stupid people. And of actually doing damage, since they know what they're doing.
Just keeping hotshots in check that want to dominate the top of the mountain is good enough for me.