Originally posted by abhilegend
Monarch destroyed Earth 51 universe. Monitors had to rebuild it.Prime destroyed Earth 15 universe and it was explained in Multiversity.
uh, so....nothing on panel. i can't even imagine--no never i can imagine exactly--what you do to people on the opposite side of a debate who show something like that. off panel=/=who cares. how did he destroy though, out of curiosity...? and what about monarch's feat of universal destruction?
So another "Superman can't be that powerful" ad hominem?Superman faced and shit stomped Brainiac wielding Imperiex's power who just had to connect Earth and Apokolips to gain absolute omnipotence.
Let me guess, Brainiac with Imperiex power who was getting even more powerful was less powerful than Imperiex?
being able to push brainiac=/=universal power. not sure what's not computing. if he had all of imperiex's power at his disposal, why not just blast supes with entropy, exactly the way imperiex obliterated doomsday? simple. he couldn't use imperiex's power like imperiex did. ffs, why not just teleport war world away from him if brainiac was so all-powerful??
pushing brainiac=/=beating imperiex OR being a universal power. it just means he was really really strong. can't believe this has to be explained to you.
btw most of those sh!tty photobucket scans are all broken.
All of the skyfathers combined attacks were planetary. So were Destroyer's attacks.You're using Odin's best feats and supplanting them on celestials. That's not how it works.
lol now THAT's ironic. but cool, if we're sticking to the letter of the text, then arishem's own answering blast was "immeasurably more potent" than all three combined. and the destroyer that faced the celestials? guess what? "virtually all-powerful". and that was BEFORE odin put not only the combined powers of all the skyfathers into the destroyer, but also his own life force AND the totality of the life force of asgard itself.
that should end the discussion, right? wait, you'll accept that the god blasts were "planetary" but that the other terminology was all hyperbole, right? you don't get to pick and choose. and you realize odin created a sword in that book with his own power that if unsheathed by the wrong person was capable of "rending the fabric of infinity" itself.
So again nothing but ad hominem?B13 with Imperiex's power isn't a universal being? Why couldn't he just stop Superman if he wasn't at that level and just watch helplessly as Superman simply pushed him to to his death?
You're again interchanging versatility with power. Those are not inclusive deals. What Superman lacked in versatility he made it up with his raw power.
no, they really aren't. at all. you think a sun dipped superman can beat kismet?? eternity?? geezus, this is the most absurd argument i've ever seen you struggle to make. i'm convinced even YOU don't believe it, but are in too deep and can't back out now....
No, I didn't. I said it's a low showing for skyfathers.There is a big difference in both.
low for them or extremely high for the celestials, who, in that book, were said to be capable of laying waste a universe? we all know where you'll fall out. in that book, celestials are said to be able to destroy a universe. crystal clear. a random celestial also blocked the disintegration beam without effort--and that beam was ridiculously amped. at normal levels it was said to be able to kill a skyfather.
I like how you are frothing at the mouth because I dare say planetary feats for skyfathers is a low showing for them.
😂
frothing? if i were pissed you'd know it. this is pointless. monarch gets obliterated by the celestials. imo his blasts would be blocked as easily--more easily--than the destroyer's disintegration beam would be. you can die on this hill alone, but clearly this is pointless. i am content to let everyone read this, and confident you are incapable of convincing anyone at all that a sun dipped superman is anymore universal in power than monarch is.