Cambridgeport School Librarian Rejects Melanias Dr. Seuss Book Donation Cause Racism

Started by Adam_PoE11 pages

Originally posted by Raisen
according to my observations rob believes what he believes due to his way of rationalizing things. rob is for the most part authentic.

bashar and adam always come from a place of venom and emotion. it's obvious to me. they are looking to put people down and demean them for not believing as they do.

amirite

Okay so Rob, this is where you lose me. We can't talk about this without you saying some super dumb shit about calling the national guard?

Can you tell us what topics are okay to post? Inform me as to what topics will not have you whining and saying dumb shit about calling the national guard.

Like the topic about conservatives doing shady shit with sex crimes, you didn't whine and say "call the national guard". Why not?

she is employed by a school. the benefit of the students is a priority for all school employees. it's what tax payers pay them for.
her denying these books based upon her own beliefs is unprofessional and selfish. it is placing her own feelings above the benefit of children.

Originally posted by Surtur
Okay so Rob, this is where you lose me. We can't talk about this without you saying some super dumb shit about calling the national guard?

Can you tell us what topics are okay to post? Inform me as to what topics will not have you whining and saying dumb shit about calling the national guard.

Like the topic about conservatives doing shady shit with sex crimes, you didn't whine and say "call the national guard". Why not?

"Can't talk", no, you're free to do whatever you like.

But this thread is still about a single person, a librarian saying "no, thanks" to a single book donation for stupid reasons. She's stupid and/or did a stupid thing, but it's harmless, so other than pointing out here stupid move, I see nothing else here.

Your turn: What exactly is there to discuss here? Sell me on it.

Originally posted by Raisen
she is employed by a school. the benefit of the students is a priority for all school employees. it's what tax payers pay them for.
her denying these books based upon her own beliefs is unprofessional and selfish. it is placing her own feelings above the benefit of children.

She said the books enforce "systemic racism and oppression" lol. She legit sounds like a crazy person.

I remember being at this nazi meeting and they just wanted us to go randomly leave Dr. Seuss books on doorsteps. Now I know why.

Originally posted by Surtur
She said the books enforce "systemic racism and oppression" lol. She legit sounds like a crazy person.

I remember being at this nazi meeting and they just wanted us to go randomly leave Dr. Seuss books on doorsteps. Now I know why.

So does she then

Originally posted by Surtur
Okay so Rob, this is where you lose me. We can't talk about this without you saying some super dumb shit about calling the national guard?

Can you tell us what topics are okay to post? Inform me as to what topics will not have you whining and saying dumb shit about calling the national guard.

Like the topic about conservatives doing shady shit with sex crimes, you didn't whine and say "call the national guard". Why not?

he's responding that way because he believes you are only posting this thread under the narrative of "liberal school employees are cwazy"

it's an us vs them attitude that is created so we can't talk about real issues. kardashian level stuff

Originally posted by Surtur
I remember being at this nazi meeting and they just wanted us to go randomly leave Dr. Seuss books on doorsteps. Now I know why.

Originally posted by Robtard
"Can't talk", no, you're free to do whatever you like.

But this thread is still about a single person, a librarian saying "no, thanks" to a single book donation for stupid reasons. She's stupid and/or did a stupid thing, but it's harmless, so other than pointing out here stupid move, I see nothing else here.

Your turn: What exactly is there to discuss here? Sell me on it.

Rob, you spoke of calling the national guard. I'm asking you which topics are worthy of posting on this message board? Which will not get snotty comments about impeachment or the national guard?

Originally posted by Robtard
"Can't talk", no, you're free to do whatever you like.

But this thread is still about a single person, a librarian saying "no, thanks" to a single book donation for stupid reasons. She's stupid and/or did a stupid thing, but it's harmless, so other than pointing out here stupid move, I see nothing else here.

Your turn: What exactly is there to discuss here? Sell me on it.

Its not harmless when its a national story trying to make Melania look like a racist.

Originally posted by Surtur
Rob, you spoke of calling the national guard. I'm asking you which topics are worthy of posting on this message board? Which will not get snotty comments about impeachment or the national guard?

FFS, that was humor, I didn't actually expect the national guard.

Now can you answer my question, what exactly do you want to discuss about this lone rogue librarian? Sell me on it.

The fact the WP needed to make a national story about it to keep the "Trumps are racist" narrative going.

It's 100% harmless, no harm was done, other than the library not getting a book but I think it will survive.

Originally posted by Sable
The fact the WP needed to make a national story about it to keep the "Trumps are racist" narrative going.

this is a valid point.

Originally posted by Robtard
It's 100% harmless, no harm was done, other than the library not getting a book but I think it will survive.

Millions of people read the story, that fits with this narrative, no harm was done?

Okay, you've convinced me. Imprison the Librarian. This. Will. Not. Stand.

Better?

Originally posted by Robtard
FFS, that was humor, I didn't actually expect the national guard.

Now can you answer my question, what exactly do you want to discuss about this lone rogue librarian? Sell me on it.

Why do I need to sell you on it? Were you forced to click this story?

Originally posted by Robtard
It's 100% harmless, no harm was done, other than the library not getting a book but I think it will survive.

why would this worthless story be printed then? there is a reason behind everything. it's baiting at it's best and it helps to make stupid people form a divisive opinion.

it's the same as how some black people complain about how the media portrays black people as criminals.

this is the media using a brainwashed third party to insinuate someone is racist.

this is how the media forms this deep polarity amongst people.

Originally posted by Robtard
Okay, you've convinced me. Imprison the Librarian. This. Will. Not. Stand.

Better?

Why do you have to go to that level? As soon as you can't be proven right, or proven wrong, you go straight to these silly games. "Impeach, Imprision etc."

Originally posted by Raisen
why would this worthless story be printed then? there is a reason behind everything. it's baiting at it's best and it helps to make stupid people form a divisive opinion.

it's the same as how some black people complain about how the media portrays black people as criminals.

this is the media using a brainwashed third party to insinuate someone is racist.

this is how the media forms this deep polarity amongst people.

Isn't it funny that the racist movies, such as confederate idealism or "blackface", were made in Hollywood by many of the same liberals decrying racism in the media?

Who was it that cast women as inferior to men? Either in the kitchen, or as damsels in distress?

White bigots are such easy targets because they exist and they say stupid shit. No one even bothers to ask where these racist media portrayals came from.. Because it's NOT the KKK. They don't make films or tv, last I checked.