Cambridgeport School Librarian Rejects Melanias Dr. Seuss Book Donation Cause Racism

Started by Raisen11 pages

Originally posted by cdtm
Isn't it funny that the racist movies, such as confederate idealism or "blackface", were made in Hollywood by many of the same liberals decrying racism in the media?

Who was it that cast women as inferior to men? Either in the kitchen, or as damsels in distress?

White bigots are such easy targets because they exist and they say stupid shit. No one even bothers to ask where these racist media portrayals came from.. Because it's NOT the KKK. They don't make films or tv, last I checked.

it's all about the money at the end of the day. the media has been a tool to mold public opinion. I've only watched a few hours of t.v. in the last few years. it's amazing what you see with fresh eyes.

He doesn't want to have a serious discussion, he just wants to show everyone how he believes all the correct things and in thus morally better than everyone else.

Originally posted by Sable
Why do you have to go to that level? As soon as you can't be proven right, or proven wrong, you go straight to these silly games. "Impeach, Imprision etc."

What else can they do when faced with how ridiculous the left is behaving? Seriously this shit is getting old. Dr. Seuss books are racist now. I do not like green eggs and ham, I do not like them...hey go lynch a black guy. This isn't just about this one person, it's about a consistent theme among imbeciles in this country. Anything you don't like? Shout racism. Some dipshit liberal will support you, guaranteed. It disturbs me there are legit people in this country who would agree with this librarian.

She should be removed from her post, she should not be able to peddle this propaganda, but it will be allowed.

Originally posted by Surtur
Why do I need to sell you on it? Were you forced to click this story?

Then you've just destroyed your point in asking me to not dismiss it. Good job

Originally posted by Silent Master
He doesn't want to have a serious discussion, he just wants to show everyone how he believes all the correct things and in thus morally better than everyone else.

^ #triggered

Still.Got.It.

Originally posted by Robtard
Then you've just destroyed your point in asking me to not dismiss it. Good job

The story speaks for itself Rob. It's also indicative of how people are behaving in this country. It's not just about the dipshit librarian who isn't fit to be around children.

I shouldn't have to sell you on this.

Originally posted by cdtm
Isn't it funny that the racist movies, such as confederate idealism or "blackface", were made in Hollywood by many of the same liberals decrying racism in the media?

Who was it that cast women as inferior to men? Either in the kitchen, or as damsels in distress?

White bigots are such easy targets because they exist and they say stupid shit. No one even bothers to ask where these racist media portrayals came from.. Because it's NOT the KKK. They don't make films or tv, last I checked.

The most racist movies in Hollywood are Blockbusters. But they are not the racists for making them, we are the racists for watching them.

You thought I was talking about you?

Interesting.

Originally posted by Sable
Why do you have to go to that level? As soon as you can't be proven right, or proven wrong, you go straight to these silly games. "Impeach, Imprision etc."

Rob?

It's like he thinks KMC is some bastion of news where the world is watching so we best only discuss super duper important shit.

Unless of course it's a conservative involved in a sex crime, then it's ultra important to post about. No national guard comments, weird.

Did you cats even read the story? It's not praising the librarian, in fact, it refers to her rational as "lazy" in both her views of Dr Seuss and her reasoning and how her actions reflect back as a teacher.

Sorry to eSodomize you all here. But I tried to brush it off at first, but you insisted on being penetrated.

WP rights paper painting Melania in a racist controversy.

Liberals: No Harm done, its just a national newspaper!

Originally posted by Robtard
Did you cats even read the story? It's not praising the librarian, in fact, it refers to her rational as "lazy" in both her views of Dr Seuss and her reasoning and how her actions reflect back as a teacher.

Sorry to eSodomize you all here. But I tried to brush it off at first, but you insisted on being penetrated.

Lol Rob, do you feel "lazy" best describes her? Please say you do.

Originally posted by Sable
WP rights paper painting Melania in a racist controversy.

Liberals: No Harm done, its just a national newspaper!

The article is critical of the Librarian. Seriously, dude. Just stop.

Originally posted by Robtard
Did you cats even read the story? It's not praising the librarian, in fact, it refers to her rational as "lazy" in both her views of Dr Seuss and her reasoning and how her actions reflect back as a teacher.

Sorry to eSodomize you all here. But I tried to brush it off at first, but you insisted on being penetrated.

calling me a cat triggers me bro

Originally posted by Raisen
calling me a cat triggers me bro

Well hey she was called lazy though. Progress.

Hitler? Frickin lazy. Yeah I went there, brought up the H man.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol Rob, do you feel "lazy" best describes her? Please say you do.

So now that the narrative of the article being an attack on Melania has been destroyed and you now understand that the Librarian was being dressed down, you attack that it didn't go far enough. Very. Poor. Form.

Next time read the article, hell, even if you just read the title this time you would have seen it: "What the librarian who rejected Melania Trump’s Dr. Seuss books as ‘racist’ got wrong"

Originally posted by Robtard
The article is critical of the Librarian. Seriously, dude. Just stop.

Yes but the narrative favors the "Trumps are racist"

Keep putting "Trumps and Racist" together enough times for enough years, people start just accepting it, facts be damned.

How many people actually read the article? They just say "Trumps-Racist" boom, more of the same.

Originally posted by Robtard
So now that the narrative of the article being an attack on Melania has been destroyed and you now understand that the Librarian was being dressed down, you attack that it didn't go far enough. Very. Poor. Form.

Next time read the article, hell, even if you just read the title this time you would have seen it: "What the librarian who rejected Melania Trump’s Dr. Seuss books as ‘racist’ got wrong"

Didn't go far enough? Indeed, people do not whine in this country about folk not going far enough to denounce things.

Cuz if they did...you'd look stupid, agreed?

Originally posted by Sable
WP rights paper painting Melania in a racist controversy.

Liberals: No Harm done, its just a national newspaper!

You realize that he's now complaining that people didn't read the story, if only there was an example where he didn't read the story and instead based his argument on the OP's word choice.