Order these fictional metals by durability

Started by Josh_Alexander18 pages
Originally posted by Sable
Look it up Ultron vs Vision Thor Ironman

You mean the mind Gem. When Vision lassered Ultron?

Okay again. Just because you are being nice.

Vibranium is energy absorbant. Basically, it can withstand energy blasts. Another instance could be pointed when the Shield repelled Hydra's blasters.

Vibranium can hold energy.

Now, Adamantium could do the same, but the user isnt isolated from this energy.

Have Cap wear an Adamantium shield and he would get his arms broken by the kinetic energy of the impacts. Or he would have gotten shocked by Thor's electricity. Would adamantium break? No.

Okay. Make a Bar of Adamantium and one of Vibranium. Vibranium bends easier.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you each make your case based off feats, cinematic statements, and logic. These are just theoretical debates in which we argue over what most people consider bullshit no one but the nerdiest of nerds actually care about arguing over.

Okay i agree.

But you see my point? In some cases movies dont specify and we are forced to use logic.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Okay i agree.

But you see my point? In some cases movies dont specify and we are forced to use logic.

I was saying you can't use comic feats not that we can't form our own opinions when direct comparisons are not available.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I was saying you can't use comic feats not that we can't form our own opinions when direct comparisons are not available.

Well thats what am using.

Is it logical to assume that MCU will go against the comics and say that Vibranium is stronger than Adamantium?

Is it logical to assume that LoTR will go against the books and say that Sauron is more powerful than Morgoth?

Do you see what am trying to point out?

The MVF Golden Rule:
What is seen on screen is canon in these forums. If your character you wish to use has feats/actions/handicaps that contradict what that character did on screen (movie canon), then it is a violation and is illegal. MOVIE FEATS ONLY!

He can't read English apparently

Originally posted by Silent Master
The MVF Golden Rule:
What is seen on screen is canon in these forums. If your character you wish to use has feats/actions/handicaps that contradict what that character did on screen (movie canon), then it is a violation and is illegal. MOVIE FEATS ONLY!

Thanks saved me the bother.

What is seen on screen is canon in this forums (doesnt say book/comic material isnt valid)

If your character has feats/actions/handicaps that CONTRADICT what the character did on screen, then it is a violation and is illegal ( So if it doesnt contradic then it is legal!).

MOVIE FEATS ONLY (What happens when the movie doesnt show or specify feats?).

You see my point?

Originally posted by Sable
He can't read English apparently

Ohh i can read and UNDERSTAND english. Can you understand English?

The MVF Golden Rule:
What is seen on screen is canon in these forums. If your character you wish to use has feats/actions/handicaps that contradict what that character did on screen (movie canon), then it is a violation and is illegal. MOVIE FEATS ONLY!

Originally posted by Silent Master
The MVF Golden Rule:
What is seen on screen is canon in these forums. If your character you wish to use has feats/actions/handicaps that contradict what that character did on screen (movie canon), then it is a violation and is illegal. MOVIE FEATS ONLY!

Can you read?

Originally posted by Silent Master
The MVF Golden Rule:
What is seen on screen is canon in these forums. If your character you wish to use has feats/actions/handicaps that contradict what that character did on screen (movie canon), then it is a violation and is illegal. MOVIE FEATS ONLY!

AND WHEN THERE ARE NO MOVIE FEATS!?

Besides if he wanted to say that Comic/Book material wasnt canon, then why include the previous statement.

He could have only said Movie feats only.

Originally posted by Sable
Can you read?

Can you?

Originally posted by Silent Master
The MVF Golden Rule:
What is seen on screen is canon in these forums. If your character you wish to use has feats/actions/handicaps that contradict what that character did on screen (movie canon), then it is a violation and is illegal. MOVIE FEATS ONLY!

Can you read?

Originally posted by Sable
Can you read?

Sable go bother someone else. 😂

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
AND WHEN THERE ARE NO MOVIE FEATS!?

Besides if he wanted to say that Comic/Book material wasnt canon, then why include the previous statement.

He could have only said Movie feats only.

Comic feats have never, I repeat never been allowed on this forum. What part of this are you having trouble understanding?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Sable go bother someone else. 😂

Can you read?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Comic feats have never, I repeat never been allowed on this forum. What part of this are you having trouble understanding?

Am having trouble understanding WHAT do you do when there are no movie feats?

Why did Impediment added the line If your character has feats/handicaps/actions that contradict that seen on screen, then it is a violation and is illegal. Cause in this case MCU hasnt contradicted Material seen on the comics (theyve never said that Vibranium is stronger than Admanatium nor depicted vibranium in an opposite way to the Comics.)

See what am trying to say?

Originally posted by Sable
Can you read?

Is your pamper poopy?

Originally posted by Impediment
Comic feats don't count here in the MVF.

The golden rule is movie feats = canon and can be used for debates.

I made this rule to save us all from blatant shit storms.

Any more questions?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Is your pamper poopy?

Your mom changed mine already, thanks!