Harvey Weinstein Lawyering Up after Reveal, Decades of Sexual Harrassment Allegations

Started by Bashar Teg21 pages

WOW we might just have to make a general thread for sexual harassment. next on the chopping block: george bush sr? damn.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/25/entertainment/heather-lind-george-bush-harassment/index.html

So basically any male of power is guilty of sexual assault? Got it.

Pretty much. Welcome to the "Murica of the Left".

Originally posted by socool8520
So basically any male of power is guilty of sexual assault? Got it.

He apologized and said it was a fouled attempt at humor. So maybe lower your MRA shields.

Originally posted by Surtur
I could post the clip of Harvey telling Bill Clinton he learned a lot from him, but I won't.

Even if you posted that clip, how does that excuse Bush Sr. or Trump's relation with Weinstein, or Roger Ailes, another predator whom Trump hired? Almost like anytime anyone says anything bad about Republicans, you feel an insecure need to bring up corrupt Democrats as though it somehow negates the Republican corruption. Shows how biased you are.

...Unless you're saying that both sides do it so we shouldn't complain about it, which is rather sociopathic thinking when it comes to sexual assault.

Originally posted by socool8520
So basically any male of power is guilty of sexual assault? Got it.

believe it or not, it's actually kinda easy to not grope a non-consentual pretty woman, if one really focuses.

Originally posted by Robtard
He apologized and said it was a fouled attempt at humor. So maybe lower your MRA shields.

Now if only we could get the Leftist Fascists to stop with their
attempts to criminalize all aspects of male behavior. Heterosexual Male Behavior that is....

Originally posted by Lestov16
Even if you posted that clip, how does that excuse Bush Sr. or Trump's relation with Weinstein, or Roger Ailes, another predator whom Trump hired? Almost like anytime anyone says anything bad about Republicans, you feel an insecure need to bring up corrupt Democrats as though it somehow negates the Republican corruption. Shows how biased you are.

...Unless you're saying that both sides do it so we shouldn't complain about it, which is rather sociopathic thinking when it comes to sexual assault.

Or what about all those times that Harvey rode in a taxi.
We should go after them as well.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
believe it or not, it's actually kinda easy to not grope a non-consentual pretty woman, if one really focuses.

Get out of your Basement Bubble some time and give it a try Bashy. You might enjoy it.

you're very old and on hard drugs? cool 👆

You live in your basement and are on several prescriptions that are in fact nothing but sugar pills. 👆

no i actually have my own place, no hard drug addictions, and pay taxes. that's how easy it is for anyone to be better than you. 👆

WHAT!? You are the only Person in the World that PAYS TAXES!?

Why is that Bashy!?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
believe it or not, it's actually kinda easy to not grope a non-consentual pretty woman, if one really focuses.

apparently not if you are rich and powerful. lol

which is easier?
a-not groping a woman without her consent
b-being a more valuable and productive human being than flyattractor

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
which is easier?
a-not groping a woman without her consent
b-being a more valuable and productive human being than flyattractor

Well I have done A with the woman's consent so at least I have that over Bashy...

He owns his own basement that he pays taxes on ya know..


😮‍💨

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Or what about all those times that Harvey rode in a taxi.
We should go after them as well.
[/B]

So are you saying that all of these celebrity accusations are false? That his ties with Hillary, Trump, and Bush Sr. do not mean involvement in the sexual assault scandal?

I would be willing to bet that a fair bet of them are kind of false. I bet a lot of those women Whore'd themselves out to "Can't Get Hard"Harvey so that they could be Rich and Famous. So they can't really play totally innocent in this. Same with Trump. Women say a Powerful Rich Man and they used their Goods to Get Some of that. Can't comment on Bush Sr. cause I haven't read anything about that having only just seen the story like 30 min ago. But I will say that what passes for "Sexual Assault" now is a far cry from what it used to mean.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Even if you posted that clip, how does that excuse Bush Sr. or Trump's relation with Weinstein, or Roger Ailes, another predator whom Trump hired? Almost like anytime anyone says anything bad about Republicans, you feel an insecure need to bring up corrupt Democrats as though it somehow negates the Republican corruption. Shows how biased you are.

...Unless you're saying that both sides do it so we shouldn't complain about it, which is rather sociopathic thinking when it comes to sexual assault.

Noobdy ever said it excused it. I'm saying both sides are shit. This doesn't mean we do not complain about it. Rather, it means folk shouldn't whine about it in a way that suggests only one side does it. For every "lol Trump and Weinstein!!!!!!" I can give you a Weinstein and Clinton, and far worse things than mere photographs.

Don't get me wrong, this doesn't mean if you post a picture like Bash did you HAVE to post something with Clinton too, I just mean it's fair game to bring up as a response.

I wouldn't call grabbing woman's breasts and grinding on them with a boner in your pants pursuing a relationship.

He might have tried just asking them out on a date. "No, okay. Thank you for your time".

Much better approach then straight up asking for sex and rubbing up on people. Had he only interacted with prostitutes prior to these offences?