Originally posted by Digi
This is a valid response to my posts in this thread, but I'm very much about approaching topics empirically in general. And I wouldn't discount stats in this discussion, though it can occasionally be hard to analyze methodology and source without a deeper dive.So, stepping back a second because my responses have also been in response to Surt and Sable, not you until now. Some of the %s you cite are far too high to be acceptable. So that's a problem, and one that I'd happily agree can be overstated to draw incorrect conclusions on either side.
But there are also topics where a subjective observation can inform empirical ones. Is it possible that rape stats can be grossly misrepresented due to false allegations, AND we have societal issues with our treatment toward women that make them more fearful and give them less freedom? The two need not be mutually exclusive.
We may not be in much disagreement here, tbh. You just caught my responses before I had addressed your own.
dude. I quoted a bunch of studies. of course there will be deviation due to sample size and location. BUT THINK, DON'T FEEL. The variance is indicative of a taught culture. that's what makes women FEEL a certain way. but it's not the truth. the truth is in the numbers dude.