Darth Maul vs Darth Malgus

Originally posted by Rebel95
That doesn't answer my question

Originally posted by Azronger
Maul, decisively

Originally posted by Rebel95
Actually upon reading up on some of Malgus' feats, Maul really doesn't compare. Here's just a couple:

-Force choking a jedi to death before defeating Ven Zallow
-Killing two padawans and a jedi knight with a single blast of force lighting.

Both these feats are before his prime and meanwhile Maul constantly struggles against Jedi all the time.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
The problem here is the jedi Maul struggled with(Kenobi) is astronomically more impressive than either of the worthless fodder pondscum you mentioned, to the point where it is insulting for Kenobi to be even mentioned in the same thread as them.

👆 , though.

Originally posted by Rebel95
Thanks man.
According to Rocky, rebels is Maul's prime yet he got humiliated by Kanan. Or do you believe Kanan is superior to Ven Zallow?

That sounds totally fair, yeah.

Your use of the term "pondscum" commands mad respect.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Your use of the term "pondscum" deserves mad respect.

it's a label worthy of those vastly sub-Kenobi fodder 🙂 .

Originally posted by Rebel95
Thanks man.
According to Rocky, rebels is Maul's prime yet he got humiliated by Kanan. Or do you believe Kanan is superior to Ven Zallow?

Originally posted by Ursumeles
wtf
I think you're not understanding what I'm saying. And idc what rocky thinks.
I never said Kanan > Ven, but that choking a random Jedi isn't better than Maul's feats; and that "maul struggles witt jedi!!!'" doesn't makes him worse than

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
If Kanan was legitimately superior to Maul, then yes, he would roflstomp Zallow.

Originally posted by Rebel95 ]No I understand what you're saying and you bring up a good point, but still Maul has never shown that kind of force superiority against any of his opponents like Malgus has [/B]

the jedi Maul struggled with(Kenobi) is astronomically more impressive than either of the worthless fodder pondscum you mentioned, to the point where it is insulting for Kenobi to be even mentioned in the same thread as them.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
So Legend, you want to make a case for Malgus that doesn't revolve around fodder?

Declaring Kao Cen Darach, the guy who collapsed a building, Republic strongholds and scores of Jedi (including Ven Zallow) fodder is absolutely silly. You can do better.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
I can tell you right now there are better ways to argue for Malgus here.

Originally posted by Rebel95
I'm still undecided on who would win between these two, but here's something: As of Return, so even before his prime, Malgus was "the most dangerous embodiment of the dark side" that Satele Shan had ever experienced

You expect that kind of performance from a warrior who has spent decades honing his skills with a lightsaber and developing powers.

Originally posted by Azronger
Having unduplicated battlefield feats doesn't mean you are a warrior without equal. It means you have unduplicated battlefield feats.

Originally posted by Azronger
Just how ignorant are you of the movie era?

^ And that guy was fodder to Vader

And Galen Marek defeated Darth Vader in single combat. He also coped with Palpatine's Force lightning until he decided to save his allies from certain death. Did you read the novel?

Conversely, Hero of Tython defeated Lord Fulminiss in single combat - the guy who was famous for devastating an entire city with his powers and other deeds. And there wasn't any guarantee that Hero of Tython could tackle Darth Malgus on his own, still.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Subjective.

Really? Galen Marek did not brought it down on his own; that starship was about to crash on the surface but Galen Marek altered its trajectory.

And Galen Marek defeated Darth Vader in single combat. He also coped with Palpatine's Force lightning until he decided to save his allies from certain death. Did you read the novel?

Conversely, Hero of Tython defeated Lord Fulminiss in single combat - the guy who was famous for devastating an entire city with his powers and other deeds. And there wasn't any guarantee that Hero of Tython could tackle Darth Malgus on his own, still.

I know it was already falling, but do you know how much energy it would be required to even alter it's trajectory like that? Millions of times more than it would take to collapse a ****ing building. Galen also literally wrenched it down at the very end.

I wasn't referring to TFU I, but TFU II, where Vader is literally toying with and is able to dominate Galen's clone who is even more powerful than the original. This was before Vader grew immensely in power.

Placing Vader at building level is uttely dishonest and would require insane levels of lowballing. The fact that you have a random Jedi scrub from the TOR era on his tier is very telling.

Fulminiss disintegrating a city is pure legend. It's never confirmed if it actually happened. Why are you taking that as legit but writing off Galen's feat on the basis off "he didn't actually bring it down" when no one claimed he did, but it still being an absolutely monsterous feat, and the pretending Vader is building-level?

Originally posted by Rebel95
Those aren't even some of his best feats but they show how he has no trouble killing Jedi whereas Maul, like I said, struggles with Jedi all the time.

The Inquisitors were all prior Jedi.

Also in the opening of "Revival" you see Maul and Opress killing Jedi pretty easily.

^ And he was stomping Aayla.
Though it seems like Rebel was reffering to the Force.

^ In that case I still don't remember where Maul struggled to Tk a Jedi.

And he choked 7th Sister pretty easily.

Still undecided. Maul takes sabers but not sure how big Malgus' force edge is...

Given Obi-Wan Kenobi's numerous impressive Force feats, and given that Maul casually incapacitated him with a Force choke, why are so many of you so readily handing Malgus the Force edge? I've seen people citing Kao Cen Darach, unnamed fodder Jedi and fuel-cells being destroyed as reasons for why Malgus is more powerful than Maul, which displays a clear lack of knowledge or analysis of Maul's own feats, which are plentiful. I have to say, while Malgus is impressive, many of his feats are woeful compared to Maul's, so I've never understood why it's so commonly accepted, blindly so, that Malgus is more powerful, other than just assuming that the people suggesting as much are stupid.

Could someone who isn't stupid explain why they support Malgus? I'm only asking for one person.

Malgus was in TOR, that automatically makes him more powerful than anyone who he's in one thread with. That's how it works.

That seems like the extent of the logic given, yes.

Originally posted by ILS
which displays a clear lack of knowledge or analysis of Maul's own feats, which are plentiful. I have to say, while Malgus is impressive, many of his feats are woeful compared to Maul's

Originally posted by Rebel95
What are Maul's best feats? The best ones I can think of off the top of my head are killing Qui Gon, briefly holding his own against Sidious, and killing the seventh sister. Any others?