Wolverine vs. MCU Lady Sif

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Wolverine has an Adamantium skeleton. Which is all i know.

Whether his ligaments and tendons are covered too i dont know. The movies/comics never touched that point.

A skeleton does not include tendons or ligaments. A skeleton is not the same as the skeletal system. This is the definition of a skeleton:

" 1 :a usually rigid supportive or protective structure or framework of an organism; especially :the bony or more or less cartilaginous framework supporting the soft tissues and protecting the internal organs of a vertebrate."

Keyword here is rigid structure. Since tendons and ligaments are not rigid, they can't be considered part of the skeleton.

Originally posted by FrothByte
A skeleton does not include tendons or ligaments. A skeleton is not the same as the skeletal system. This is the definition of a skeleton:

" 1 :a usually rigid supportive or protective structure or framework of an organism; especially :the bony or more or less cartilaginous framework supporting the soft tissues and protecting the internal organs of a vertebrate."

Keyword here is [b]rigid structure. Since tendons and ligaments are not rigid, they can't be considered part of the skeleton. [/B]

Isn't it interesting that he now says he doesn't know, kind of goes against what he's been arguing for the last several pages.

Originally posted by FrothByte
A skeleton does not include tendons or ligaments. A skeleton is not the same as the skeletal system. This is the definition of a skeleton:

" 1 :a usually rigid supportive or protective structure or framework of an organism; especially :the bony or more or less cartilaginous framework supporting the soft tissues and protecting the internal organs of a vertebrate."

Keyword here is [b]rigid structure. Since tendons and ligaments are not rigid, they can't be considered part of the skeleton. [/B]

You are right.

I got carried away by the word Cartilegenous.

My most sincere apologies SilentMaster. You were right after all.

Guess you won this point.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Isn't it interesting that he now says he doesn't know, kind of goes against what he's been arguing for the last several pages.

Hahahaha Good job. I was wrong.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Yes you are

He might not be stronger than Thor.

But Wolverine's strength isnt insignificant like you guys picture it.

Thor without hia powerbelt, armor, and mjolnir is weaker than Wolverine.

Per the most recent movie,

Spoiler:
you're wrong about Thor's abilities coming from his equipment.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Per the most recent movie,

Spoiler:
you're wrong about Thor's abilities coming from his equipment.

Will reply to you when i watch the movie.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Per the most recent movie,

Spoiler:
you're wrong about Thor's abilities coming from his equipment.

No am not.

Just watched the movie.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
No am not.

Just watched the movie.

lmmfao

Originally posted by Silent Master
Per the most recent movie,

Spoiler:
you're wrong about Thor's abilities coming from his equipment.

Yup

Spoiler:
Thor had no belt, as it is still on Earth, as per Spiderman: Homecoming.
He was not wearing his normal armour for most of the film. He was in the Sakaar gladiator garb.
He did not have Mjolnir for most of the film. He either went H2H or used whatever weapons were at hand.

Yet he showed arguably greater overall power (he still has better striking feats with Mjolnir though) than he ever has before. During the escape from Sakaar/flight up the Anus scene, he was literally tearing through enemy ships with his bare hands. And when he fully tapped into his powers, he probably spammed more lightning during one battle than he has across all of his previous appearances combined.

And Odin explicitly states that the power has always been inside him. As Odin pointed out, Thor is not the God of Hammers. Mjolnir simply helped him regulate and control his powers.

I watched a leaked scene of that reminds me of

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/99/a2/ca/99a2caa7ddaac39669f0c7dfad41b739--thor-marvel-marvel-comics.jpg

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
No am not.

Just watched the movie.

Thank you for admitting that you're a liar.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Thank you for admitting that you're a liar.

Thank you for admitting you are either too stupid to understand the movie or you just decided to ignore important things in it.

Now let me focus to respond to those who are ACTUALLY DEBATING and dont make me waste my time on stupid personal comments.

Everyone now knows you're a liar.

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
Yup

Spoiler:
Thor had no belt, as it is still on Earth, as per Spiderman: Homecoming.
He was not wearing his normal armour for most of the film. He was in the Sakaar gladiator garb.
He did not have Mjolnir for most of the film. He either went H2H or used whatever weapons were at hand.

Yet he showed arguably greater overall power (he still has better striking feats with Mjolnir though) than he ever has before. During the escape from Sakaar/flight up the Anus scene, he was literally tearing through enemy ships with his bare hands. And when he fully tapped into his powers, he probably spammed more lightning during one battle than he has across all of his previous appearances combined.

And Odin explicitly states that the power has always been inside him. As Odin pointed out, Thor is not the God of Hammers. Mjolnir simply helped him regulate and control his powers.

Okay.

Spoiler:
Its clear Marvel has changed Thor's character in this last movie.

We are not longer talking about Thor Odinson prince of Asgard, but MCU has clearly moved from that to King Thor.

Ragnarok was the gateway to evolve both Thor and Hulk.

And Yes you are right. Odin himself said that Mjolnir and his gear were only conductors of his power.

But also Thor himself said that it was his hammer which made him fly.

So basically Pre-Ragnarok Thor was like a child which needed a baby walker (Mjolnir).

But yet he needed it. Pre-Ragnarok Thor was MASSIVELY DEPENDANT on Mjolnir and his gear. He even told Odin when being beaten by Hela that he couldnt defeat her without Mjolnir.

So, Pre-Ragnarok Thor《《《《King Thor.

Now. After seeing Ragnarok its clear Thor is much much stronger than Wolverine.

The only reason I ever backed up Wolverine was because we were talking about Prince Thor. Now we are talking about King Thor.....His powers will increase dramatically.

NOW!! AGAIN I REPEAT.

This thread doesnt concern Thor in any way.

This thread died long time ago.

Lets please let it sleep. If you want to keep talking about Thor make a thread that concerns him.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Everyone now knows you're a liar.

Everyone knows you are an idiot.

You're a known liar, so insults from you are worthless

Originally posted by Silent Master
You're a known liar, so insults from you are worthless

Personal comments dont concern this thread.

Please refrain yourself from posting else for debating this thread's issuem

You being a liar is relevant to the thread.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You being a liar is relevant to the thread.

Dont make ma contact a moderator.

Stop spamming the thread.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Dont make ma contact a moderator.

Stop spamming the thread.

Brining up relevant information isn't spamming and you being a liar is very relevant as it brings everything you post into question.