Wolverine vs. MCU Lady Sif

Started by Josh_Alexander15 pages
Originally posted by Silent Master
Brining up relevant information isn't spamming and you being a liar is very relevant as it brings everything you post into question.

First of all THOR NEVER CONCERN THIS THREAD. Nor do your personal opinions.

So be mature and stop posting things that fall outside thread parameters.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
First of all THOR NEVER CONCERN THIS THREAD. Nor do your personal opinions.

So be mature and stop posting things that fall outside thread parameters.

You compared Wolverine's strength to Thor, that makes him relevant.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You compared Wolverine's strength to Thor, that makes him relevant.

Yeah well forget about it.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Yeah well forget about it.

As it concerns the thread. No, I won't forget it.

Originally posted by Silent Master
As it concerns the thread. No, I won't forget it.

👆

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
👆

So ago ahead and back up your claim that Wolverine has comparable strength to Thor.

Originally posted by Silent Master
So ago ahead and back up your claim that Wolverine has comparable strength to Thor.

This thread concerns Sif vs Wolverine.

Thor falls outside this thread's parameters so please refrain yourself from including him in this thread.

Thank you.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
This thread concerns Sif vs Wolverine.

Thor falls outside this thread's parameters so please refrain yourself from including him in this thread.

Thank you.

I'm asking you to back up your claim in regards to Wolverine's strength.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I'm asking you to back up your claim in regards to Wolverine's strength.

Why for?

Wolverine has already defeated Sif. That discussion is long time over.

I don't need to back up anything.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Why for?

Wolverine has already defeated Sif. That discussion is long time over.

I don't need to back up anything.

More people have stated that Sif wins, so the debate isn't over and thus Wolverine's strength is relevant to the thread.

Originally posted by Silent Master
More people have stated that Sif wins, so the debate isn't over and thus Wolverine's strength is relevant to the thread.

A lot of people has also said Wolverine wins.

And based on facts, which you never addressed Sif LOST this battle.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
A lot of people has also said Wolverine wins.

And based on facts, which you never addressed Sif LOST this battle.

Far more people said that Sif wins, so the debate is far from over.

Correction, based on your massively biased interpretation of the facts. you falsely think Logan wins.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Far more people said that Sif wins, so the debate is far from over.

Correction, based on your massively biased interpretation of the facts. you falsely think Logan wins.

Without a base or evidence to back up their claims.

Still you and the others never met my evidence and facts. All you did was throw shitty comments WHICH ISN'T CONSIDERED DEBATING!

This thread is LONG TIME OVER. And you HAVE LONG TIME LOST this debate.

I don't have to do anything anymore.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Without a base or evidence to back up their claims.

Still you and the others never met my evidence and facts. All you did was throw shitty comments WHICH ISN'T CONSIDERED DEBATING!

This thread is LONG TIME OVER. And you HAVE LONG TIME LOST this debate.

I don't have to do anything anymore.

Your "evidence and facts" don't actually prove what you think they do. so your opinion that the other side doesn't have a base or evidence to back up their claims is laughable.

You have zero credibility in regards to judging facts or evidence.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Your "evidence and facts" don't actually prove what you think they do. so your opinion that the other side doesn't have a base or evidence to back up their claims is laughable.

You have zero credibility in regards to judging facts or evidence.

Evidence is Evidence. It can't be twisted.

Like the fact Wolverine is made up of Adamantium.

Like the fact that Wolverine has super fast regeneration.

Like the fact that Lady Sif doesn't have a way to harm Wolverine.

You have CLEARLY LOST THIS DEBATE SilentMaster. Have the balls to admit it atleast.

Not longer debating with you, since you have 0 sense of logic, and 0 knowledge on Marvel Characters.

Not debating this anymore. I have rebuked your points while you have only trashed talked. My credibility atleast has evidence while yours has trash.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Evidence is Evidence. It can't be twisted.

Like the fact Wolverine is made up of Adamantium.

Like the fact that Wolverine has super fast regeneration.

Like the fact that Lady Sif doesn't have a way to harm Wolverine.

You have CLEARLY LOST THIS DEBATE SilentMaster. Have the balls to admit it atleast.

Not longer debating with you, since you have 0 sense of logic, and 0 knowledge on Marvel Characters.

Not debating this anymore. I have rebuked your points while you have only trashed talked. My credibility atleast has evidence while yours has trash.

A person's interpretation of the evidence can easy be twisted by bias. BTW, Wolverine isn't made up of adamantium.

Originally posted by Silent Master
A person's interpretation of the evidence can easy be twisted by bias. BTW, Wolverine isn't made up of adamantium.

His skeleton is 😉

No. Facts only hint one way.

Who is being biased here? Cause the very moment you supported SIF is obvious you have an affair for her. SHE COULD NEVER DEFEAT LOGAN.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
His skeleton is 😉

No. Facts only hint one way.

Who is being biased here? Cause the very moment you supported SIF is obvious you have an affair for her. SHE COULD NEVER DEFEAT LOGAN.

Thank you for admitting you were wrong.

The fact that you can't see how bias can effect the way someone views facts/evidence shows just why your interpretations can't be trusted.

You're being biased.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Thank you for admitting you were wrong.

The fact that you can't see how bias can effect the way someone views facts/evidence shows just why your interpretations can't be trusted.

You're being biased.

As i said. This is past debating. I gave my points which you never address.

LOL!!!