Mueller Now Investigating Democratic Lobbyist Tony Podesta

Started by Surtur8 pages

Mueller Now Investigating Democratic Lobbyist Tony Podesta

Mueller Now Investigating Democratic Lobbyist Tony Podesta

"The sources said the investigation into Podesta and his company began as more of a fact-finding mission about the ECMU and Manafort's role in the campaign, but has now morphed into a criminal inquiry into whether the firm violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, known as FARA."

Weird. A non-story probably. On the other hand for certain folk it's certainly not a non-story whenever Mueller acts on some shit. Nice.

Re: Mueller Now Investigating Democratic Lobbyist Tony Podesta

Originally posted by Surtur
[
On the other hand for certain folk it's certainly not a non-story whenever Mueller acts on some shit. Nice.

for months you've been trying to discredit mueller and the investigation as it concerned the trump administration.
as usual you will see no deflective cucking from the left, as you have demonstrated consistently. keep tryharding while not recognising your own clownish hypocrisy.

#ohsquirt

Re: Re: Mueller Now Investigating Democratic Lobbyist Tony Podesta

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
for months you've been trying to discredit mueller and the investigation as it concerned the trump administration.
as usual you will see no deflective cucking from the left, as you have demonstrated consistently. keep tryharding while not recognising your own clownish hypocrisy.

#ohsquirt

how you doing buddy? I just saw blade runner 2049

oh?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
for months you've been trying to discredit mueller and the investigation as it concerned the trump administration.
as usual you will see no deflective cucking from the left, as you have demonstrated consistently. keep tryharding while not recognising your own clownish hypocrisy.

#ohsquirt

Lol you just deflected dipshit.

nope. just pointed out OP's laughable hypocrisy.

but as i already stated, i support mueller's investigation and trust his integrity. now.what?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
nope. just pointed out OP's laughable hypocrisy.

but as i already stated, i support mueller's investigation and trust his integrity. now.what?

You deflected, whined about other shit. Too funny. What a dipstick.

For me this is awesome either way. Either we denounce Mueller and all he has done, or we acknowledge the importance of shit he looks into, all the shit.

i just directly addressed the topic with finality, you posturing boy.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i just directly addressed the topic with finality, you posturing boy.

You whined like a dipshit too though. You whined in order to try to make this topic about your whining. Your pals will come in and pounce on it, it'll be funny.

oh squirt

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
oh squirt

So Mueller: to be taken seriously or no? To be fair, if the Uranium One thing turns out true I'll come say this is bullshit.

Originally posted by Surtur
So Mueller: to be taken seriously or no? To be fair, if the Uranium One thing turns out true I'll come say this is bullshit.

i already answered that. learn to read, squirt.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i already answered that. learn to read, squirt.

Why couldn't you respond without whining?

But we can be real: for months dipshits here presented this f*ckhead as a revenant. Well, is he revenant'ing now?

I'm not even sure at this point what variety of strawman you're trying to make of me. you're just ridiculous.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
I'm not even sure at this point what variety of strawman you're trying to make of me. you're just ridiculous.

Your deflections have been noted.

How much MSM coverage do you feel this will get? More or less than Trump getting an extra ice cream scoop?

Surt, "deflection" would indicate Bashar hasn't already addressed your question but lo and behold:

i support mueller's investigation and trust his integrity. now.what?

It's time to move on.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Surt, "deflection" would indicate Bashar hasn't already addressed your question but lo and behold:

It's time to move on.

After he deflected lol. Do you deny his first post was a deflection? We can move on as soon as you say it was, since you felt the need to weigh in. People who constantly whine about deflections need theirs noted, I'd say.

Originally posted by Surtur
After he deflected lol. Do you deny his first post was a deflection? We can move on as soon as you say it was, since you felt the need to weigh in. People who constantly whine about deflections need theirs noted, I'd say.

Not really, his first post was a direct response to what you said:
On the other hand for certain folk it's certainly not a non-story whenever Mueller acts on some shit. Nice.

Directly addressing a point you're making is the opposite of a deflection.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Not really, his first post was a direct response to what you said:

Directly addressing a point you're making is the opposite of a deflection.

He directly responded to one thing and ignored the main topic. The main "point" as you'd say.

That's a deflection. Are you sadly going to continue to defend this? Since when you ignore the main point and focus on something that wasn't the main point in order to talk shit, that's a deflection.

Originally posted by Surtur
He directly responded to one thing and ignored the main topic. The main "point" as you'd say.

When I first read your post, I also interpreted the "on the other hand for certain folk..."to be your main point. Furthermore you weren't very specific in your op about what you wanted the discussion to be about. There's a wide range of possible points or comments one can make in relation to an article you post.

There's a difference between saying something about a genral topic and responding to a direct point.

When you asked Bashar a specific question, he directly responded to you. Granted, while he was answering, he also did "talk sh!t", but that's different from ignoring your point which would imply he didn't respond to what you were saying when he definitely did:

but as i already stated, i support mueller's investigation and trust his integrity. now.what?

In the same post as he "talked sh!t", he also answered your question. The concepts are not mutually exclusive.