Mueller Now Investigating Democratic Lobbyist Tony Podesta

Dude, the title of the thread is about Mueller investigating Tony Podesta.

You desperately trying to act like it wasn't a deflection is...well, what?

In the same post he talked shit he answered? This post he talked shit in:

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
for months you've been trying to discredit mueller and the investigation as it concerned the trump administration.
as usual you will see no deflective cucking from the left, as you have demonstrated consistently. keep tryharding while not recognising your own clownish hypocrisy.

#ohsquirt

Are you gonna continue to cuck for him?

Quote and respond to me point by point so that you specifically address what I say.

Elaborating on your own position is not the same as countering mine.

You spewed a bunch of nonsense. The main point of the thread is clear, it's about Tony Podesta.

Did you want to continue to cuck?

Originally posted by Surtur
The main point of the thread is clear, it's about Tony Podesta.

Did you want to continue to cuck?

Mueller is also directly mentioned in your OP so it's fair for Bashar to talk about Mueller.

Additionally Bashar did directly address a point that you made in your Op. A deflection is when you address something that is unrelated to the topic or ignore and respond or elaborate about something that is unrelated to a specific point another user makes. What Bashar said was direct response to something you said.

Good. This should be a nonpartisan issue. Democrat or Republican, if you did something shady in regards to the election Mueller should go after them.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Tony Pedesta isn't a point, it's a topic, one of multiple that are touched on in the article you posted.

Mueller is also directly mentioned in your OP so it's fair for Bashar to talk about Mueller.

Additionally Bashar did directly address a point that you made in your Op. A deflection is when you address something that is unrelated to the topic or ignore and respond or elaborate about something that is unrelated to a specific point another user makes. What Bashar said was direct response to something you said.

Holy shit dude. The topic is about Tony Podesta. This person ignored everything else and quoted a throw away comment made at the end of my post, ignoring everything else, the meat of the topic.

That's deflecting.

Or if you want to get specific I guess I don't know what you'd call it, cowardly ducking the main reason of the thread in order to focus on one thing to whine about? Would that work?

Anyway Surtur as I've directly responded to you on Bashar's debating ettiquite multiple times now, I'm going to address something you said of substance:

How much MSM coverage do you feel this will get?

And no, it's not going to get as much coverage as Trump's investigation because Trump is the president of the United States.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Anyway Surtur as I've directly responded to you on Bashar's debating ettiquite multiple times now, I'm going to address something you said of substance:

Check the source of the article you posted.

And no, it's not going to get as much coverage as Trump's investigation because Trump is the president of the United States.

You responded in not so sufficient ways, but indeed you did respond.

Okay so I asked how much it will get. I didn't say it'd get zero, since...I know the source I posted.

Will it get as much coverage as if this were a republican? I'd never dream of as much coverage as the Trump investigation lol, holy shit how much blood magic would it take for that to happen?

Originally posted by BackFire
Good. This should be a nonpartisan issue. Democrat or Republican, if you did something shady in regards to the election Mueller should go after them.

Indeed, he should look into that Uranium One thing too.

Perhaps he has, or will.

Originally posted by BackFire
Perhaps he has, or will.

I'm messing with you, he can't. He was in charge of the FBI during that lol. He'd be partially investigating himself.

Originally posted by Surtur
Holy shit dude. The topic is about Tony Podesta. ]

Originally posted by Surtur
This person ignored everything else and quoted a throw away comment made at the end of my post, ignoring everything else, the meat of the topic.

And that "throw away" comment happens to be the only point you made in the Op

Originally posted by Surtur
Or if you want to get specific I guess I don't know what you'd call it, cowardly ducking the main reason of the thread in order to focus on one thing to whine about? Would that work? [

When you clarified, Bashar answered you directly.

Anyway, I'll respond to the question so I'm also not accused of deflecting.

I don't have an issue with Mueller investigating Podesta.

Oh ok.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
More accurately, it's about Mueller investigating Podesta.

Mueller's investigations are relevant to a thread about Mueller investigating someone.

And that "throw away" comment happens to be the only point you made in the Op

You never stated a reason for the thread.

When you clarified, Bashar answered you directly.

Anyway, I'll respond to the question so I'm also not accused of deflecting.

I don't have an issue with Mueller investigating Podesta.

Holy shit, you know the point of the thread and so did he(it's why he quoted only that part lol). Ignoring everything else and focusing on that one comment is no better than the shit these people whine about.

It's why him whining about hypocrisy is especially funny.

PS: You didn't deflect, you just complained about someone else's deflection being called out. So you don't have to worry about deflection accusations.

Originally posted by BackFire
Oh ok.

Wait, since he was in charge he probably knew so technically at one point he "investigated" and didn't care, if the story is true.

Ha yeah that's a devastating potential reality actually.

Originally posted by Surtur
Holy shit, you know the point of the thread and so did he(it's why he quoted only that part lol). Ignoring everything else and focusing on that one comment is no better than the shit these people whine about.

Weird. A non-story probably. On the other hand for certain folk it's certainly not a non-story whenever Mueller acts on some shit. Nice.

Originally posted by Surtur
PS: You didn't deflect, you just complained about someone else's deflection being called out. So you don't have to worry about deflection accusations.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Surtur, the point Bashar directly addressed also happened to be the only point you made in the op:

That is, by default, the main point of your OP.

😇

Dude, the point was obviously the story I posted. Did you want to continue this back and forth where you pretend otherwise? How much longer did you intend to cuck here?

Originally posted by Surtur
Dude, the point was obviously the story I posted.

You made one point about the story in the OP and Bashar directly addressed it.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
A story is just a story until you make a point about it.

You made one point about the story in the OP and Bashar directly addressed it.

Okay man, whatever way you need to justify this cucking.

Originally posted by Surtur
Deflection