Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Yeah, no "leftists" are sweating this. Conservative media is sweating, which is why they've concocted this non-story from information that has been public knowledge since October of last year. We're just laughing at the total gullibility of conservatives who never cease to fall for this crap every single time.
Bingo
They know the potential splash this could make, so they're playing damage control by dusting off old and irrelevant news
Originally posted by Robtard
Lock her and Trump up then 👆
Fair. 👆
Originally posted by Robtard
BingoThey know the potential [b]splash
this could make, so they're playing damage control by dusting off old and irrelevant news [/B]
Noticed the urine colored touch. Your craftsmanship does not go unnoticed.
Edit - This is was not a story that the conservatards concocted. This was a story busted out by the liberal NYT.
And before anyone tries to contradict, the Washington Posts lists NYT as liberal, even more liberal than Huffington Post:
yep.
Money doesn't have to be exchanged for soliciting goods/services from foreigners to be a crime. The soliciting alone is a crime itself.
And are we really going to pretend that the Junior meeting wasn't a cascading series of lies that had to be pulled tooth by tooth to finally uncover some of the truth? Of course we are, because different rules for Trump.
Say it with me: LOCK THEM ALL UP. Clinton, Trump, Kushner, Podesta, Junior, Manafort and anyone else involved.
God these people are dipshits.
This isn't a Left thing, it isn't a Right thing: it's a Human thing when lotsa power is at stake. But some peeps are worse than others. The Clintons are no innocents, but then, they don't lie as readily as they breathe nor imply they're the only ones to be trusted nor attack war heroes and Gold Star families nor foam-at-the-mouth to conceal their tax returns. In this game of Who's Worse, there is only one temperamental, politically incompetent, demagogic windbag who conned his way into office by playing on the fears and prejudices of white people.
That said: I have said from the beginning, I don't care what claim is made by which side of the isle: you better have evidence to back it up, otherwise it's just noise out of the pie hole. If Clinton is guilty, so be it. If Trump is innocent, so be it. Truth before party.
The anti-Trump (pro-Truth?) forces have been hard at work at this. The pro-Trump (the Trump Entranced?) better get their ass in gear as well. Let's hope, in investigating Clinton, they do better than with Benghazi. Regardless, and if it hasn't started already, there's gonna be a subtle shift of the Trump Entranced from explicitly defending Trump to implicitly defending their decision to vote for him. Saving face trumps all.
Originally posted by Mindship
This isn't a Left thing, it isn't a Right thing: it's a Human thing when lotsa power is at stake. But some peeps are worse than others. The Clintons are no innocents, but then, they don't lie as readily as they breathe nor imply they're the only ones to be trusted nor attack war heroes and Gold Star families nor foam-at-the-mouth to conceal their tax returns. In this game of Who's Worse, there is only one temperamental, politically incompetent, demagogic windbag who conned his way into office by playing on the fears and prejudices of white people.That said: I have said from the beginning, I don't care what claim is made by which side of the isle: you better have evidence to back it up, otherwise it's just noise out of the pie hole. If Clinton is guilty, so be it. If Trump is innocent, so be it. Truth before party.
The anti-Trump (pro-Truth?) forces have been hard at work at this. The pro-Trump (the Trump Entranced?) better get their ass in gear as well. Let's hope, in investigating Clinton, they do better than with Benghazi. Regardless, and if it hasn't started already, there's gonna be a subtle shift of the Trump Entranced from explicitly defending Trump to implicitly defending their decision to vote for him. Saving face trumps all.