Originally posted by Emperordmb
It's not a semantic, there's a difference between making generalizations about an ideology, and judging people's worth based on their skin color. You're trying to draw a false equivalency here that doesn't exist.
nah, you're trying to dismiss bigotry as some harmless thing unrelated to racism, which is easily dismissable and ignorable. good talk 👆
Originally posted by Darth Thor
No that was a Joke in return. Look it's all so funny LOLDumb ass.
But...your joke didn't make any sense lol. My joke about exploding people makes sense, radical Islamists explode folk. They also mutilate female genitals.
So no your joke wasn't funny, but that's only because it was poorly thought out. Try harder next time.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
nah, you're trying to dismiss bigotry as some harmless thing unrelated to racism, which is easily dismissable and ignorable. good talk 👆
We can judge right now how seriously you should be taken on this subject: have you ever made a bigoted statement on this forum?
I am not even going to challenge you on your answer if you say no, I will just let such an answer sink in. Because it will tell us all we need to know about how much you truly care about bigotry.
Originally posted by Surtur
Lol...I do know what provoked means. What I am saying to you is I said what I said in response to someone else,
Yeah you don't know what Provoked means. Carthage didn't "provoke" you.
Originally posted by Surtur
and I then made a joke. That is not harassment. How fragile are you?
Your joke was an unprovoked attack on me. Between you and Carthage I could hardly post there without the whole Islamic thing coming up. Other posters were even asking what's going on there.
Originally posted by Surtur
Serious question: did you not get it was a joke?
The Joke being that I mutilate women's genitals?
Yeah real funny.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Yeah you don't know what Provoked means. Carthage didn't "provoke" you.
His comment is the reason I responded lol. You can call it whatever you want, but that fact won't change.
Your joke was an unprovoked attack on me. Between you and Carthage I could hardly post there without the whole Islamic thing coming up. Other posters were even asking what's going on there.
Jokes are attacks now? Christ almighty.
The Joke being that I mutilate women's genitals?Yeah real funny.
Will you get what I said correct, at least? I said you needed to explode 2 virgins and they needed to have been mutilated, lol. That's not actually saying you specifically need to mutilate them or that you do.
Holy shit it was a joke, it was not people harassing you.
I also ask again: did you think my comment was serious when you read it?
Originally posted by Surtur
LOL! You ljust ignored everything about that topic in order to make your statement. Holy hell.
You're whining how Islam ruins your day, everyday, for the last three pages; that's not the topic of the thread either, sport. Do you ever think before mashing the submit button?
Originally posted by Robtard
You're whining how Islam ruins your day, everyday, for the last three pages; that's not the topic of the thread either, sport. Do you ever think before mashing the submit button?
Islam ruins a lot of peoples days. When you make comments about if people think before mashing submit...does any self awareness kick in? Or do you just blindly type that out without a second thought?
But you know what Rob? You're correct. This topic is about an Islamic terror attack and that is what should be discussed. We'll see if you truly wanted to get back on topic, though, based on how you respond.
So Darth Thor: I don't give a shit if you feel harassed lol. It was a joke post that you made worse by fundamentally misunderstanding what racism is. There will be no further back and forth over this.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Anyway regarding Islam being evil or good here’s both perspectives:
Originally posted by Darth Thor
What are you stupid or something?Read the thread and tell me who attacked whose character first?
Again if you've still not read the thread then why exactly are you getting involved?
That doesn't substantiate your claim of racism though.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
I'm not commenting on the thread because I haven't read it, and he very well may be guilty of what you're saying he is.That doesn't substantiate your claim of racism though.
Lol, go read it and see my comments in here about it. He's claiming a joke, in response to what someone else said to him, is harassment. It's retarded, but I'm done going back and forth with him over it. He LITERALLY calls me racist in the thread because of my comment lol.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
I'm not commenting on the thread because I haven't read it, and he very well may be guilty of what you're saying he is.That doesn't substantiate your claim of racism though.
So let me get this straight. My attack on him needs to be substantiated, but his attack on me doesn't?
Sure thing bro. You're not displaying any bias here whatsoever and you're comments are completely flawless.
It's my "belief" that Mass Prejudice and Racism are usually interconnected. And I've seen enough of Surtur's posts (as have others) to make that assertion about him myself.
But regardless I only cam out with that when he began harassing me on other forums. So I really don't get why you're defending him and attacking me.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Muhammad apparently marrying a 10 year old.
I would argue that is not merely my definition, but that any normal sane person would see that as pedophilia too if you bang a child. Say you don't think he banged one if you want, but don't act like me saying someone who does that is some personal definition of it.
So okay, where did Jesus condone that? Where did Jesus revere a pedophile? Where did Abe Lincoln revere a pedophile? Where and when did the Founding Fathers revere pedophiles?
Originally posted by Surtur
I would argue that is not merely my definition, but that any normal sane person would see that as pedophilia too if you bang a child.
In today's day and age, of course.
Originally posted by Surtur
Say you don't think he banged one if you want, but don't act like me saying someone who does that is some personal definition of it.
He actually might not have. There's a statement that suggests she was very young, but there's other contradicting evidences that suggest she couldn't have been, in which case your hatred towards over a Billion people would be based on false information.
Originally posted by SurturSo okay, where did Jesus condone that? Where did Jesus revere a pedophile? Where did Abe Lincoln revere a pedophile? Where and when did the Founding Fathers revere pedophiles?
Jesus? Marrying 10 year olds was perfectly normal in his day and culture. Yet he never condemned it. Heck there's even passages in the Old Testament that allows it which he didn't condone. And as you and Dmb have so smartly pointed out, he did condemn the stoning to death from the Old Testament.
Age of consent in the States ranged from 10-13 at the time. Neither the Founding Fathers or Ab Lincoln ever spoke out against that.
Ergo all those people condemned Pedophilia by your definition.
So I guess all of our revered forefathers were evil pedo supporters.