When it says that "we must cleave to the ship", it simply meant that they must hang on tight to the ship (according to artistic perspective.)
If there were no pictures however, it would mean that they were to become one with the ship. The artist seems to have been unable to perfectly reproduce what the writer intended.
Originally posted by abhilegend
And?
He is inside the ship in the second panel as he himself says that they need to cleave the ship. Not to mention its not shown as a durability feat.
He says “cleaves to”:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cleave%20to
He is on the outside of the ship cleaving to it. He is too small to see in that panel. Tell me exactly why it is not shown as a durability feat.
Originally posted by TheHulkster
He says “cleaves to”:https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cleave%20to
He is on the outside of the ship cleaving to it. He is too small to see in that panel. Tell me exactly why it is not shown as a durability feat.
the ss feat seems....not terribly impressive depicted the way it was. seems they just rode it out under the protection of the ship somehow. at the very least it's pretty ambiguous. even the way the speech bubble breaks up in that second panel seems to allude to the idea that he is in the ship...somehow. i wouldn't be comfortable touting that as a durability feat, but what do i know? /shrug
Originally posted by leonidas
the ss feat seems....not terribly impressive depicted the way it was. seems they just rode it out under the protection of the ship somehow. at the very least it's pretty ambiguous. even the way the speech bubble breaks up in that second panel seems to allude to the idea that he is in the ship...somehow. i wouldn't be comfortable touting that as a durability feat, but what do i know? /shrug
Originally posted by TheHulkster
Death doesn’t say that. Death gives an cryptically ambiguous “perhaps”.
Originally posted by Smurph
No, the question isn't "would", but "could". Using high end showings of Surfer's blasts against an average Superman is fair game.Put another way, answering this question as "Surfer could not hurt Superman with blasts" sounds dumb AF. Surfer [b]can
output blast power well above what has harmed Superman.This is a ridiculously low bar for any high herald to reach. [/B]
I disagree. Characters operate at different levels of power at different times. To assume otherwise, or that all feats of a character are consistent, is asinine.
Surfer, and other characters, have blasted with all their might at different times at totally different and inconsistent levels of power. In general, Surfer can’t affect his peers well with his blasts. In other words, Surfer’s blasts are fodder against high herald level characters and above.
In summary, Surfer’s high end blasts are due to comic inconsistency and not due to his intentions.