Britain. Russia Interfered with your BREXIT!?

Started by dadudemon8 pages
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Edit: Please stop. 😬

Why? Their memes are better than yours. Step up your game.

MonkeyBangingOnGlass.jpg

[bada typed that, not me, HaHaUFailGtfo]

Originally posted by dadudemon
Why? Their memes are better than yours. Step up your game.
He can only resort to gifs that describe himself.

We actually have good humour.

Originally posted by Foxsteak
He can only resort to gifs that describe himself.

We actually have good humour.

not my fault you ran out of beer money and have to suffer withdrawal. next time either quit drinking or at least pace yourself, instead of scapegoating me for your problems. 👆

How about we all get back on topic and put our penises away as to cease with the dick waving, hmm?

Any more off topic jabber and this thread is closed.

Close it. Thread sucks.

as i commented with the catalonia situation:

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
can't help but suspect putin's dick in all this

Or maybe people are sick of the EU bullshit?

It's kinda dumb when the media keep thinking Russia is behind every democratic vote they don't like. Furthermore, if Putin can control our democracies so easily, why aren't we doing anything about it?

He rigged Bernie from winning too, right?

none of that supports/refutes/addresses the real issue of russia meddling with democracies. but i guess you have to reply to everything i post with something.

I just think it's fake news.

so 160 million americans were not sent russia-funded propaganda on social media. those congressional hearings where social media executives spilled the beans are also just "fake news" as well, yes? basically everything that you don't like is fake news.

Oh, so Russia sent propoganda on social media? Did he do that with Brexit too?

Because, I fail to see how this is a hack. I mean, you could say they hacked social media to influence an election (would need to see evidence on that) but that's not hacking an election, is it?

hacking/leaking servers of an undesirable party and flooding another country with propaganda to influence elections is in fact 'meddling'. your fee-fees do not factor into this.

Well, if it's true, then you may be onto something.

Originally posted by Stigma
Speaking of babies, you really have some growing up to do.

You should think before posting pornographic images on an open forum where minors can browse through threads. /smh

You missed the 30 page meltdown he had the other week lol. It was hilarious.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
so 160 million americans were not sent russia-funded propaganda on social media. those congressional hearings where social media executives spilled the beans are also just "fake news" as well, yes? basically everything that you don't like is fake news.

300+ million Americans were sent and exposed to Hillary-funded propaganda on social media.

A better question for you is, why do you care so much about this? Is it because you have not-a-Democrat as your president? You did not seem to care too much about the billion spent by Obama.

Are you trying to make the case that the average American cannot be trusted to vote because they might get influenced by a person or people whose interests do not necessarily reflect yours? Because that's the only "solution" to your complaint that can actually address the problem. Complaining that someone bought ad space for an election is rather pathetic.

Originally posted by dadudemon
300+ million Americans were sent and exposed to Hillary-funded propaganda on social media.

A better question for you is, why do you care so much about this? Is it because you have not-a-Democrat as your president? You did not seem to care too much about the billion spent by Obama.

Are you trying to make the case that the average American cannot be trusted to vote because they might get influenced by a person or people whose interests do not necessarily reflect yours? Because that's the only "solution" to your complaint that can actually address the problem. Complaining that someone bought ad space for an election is rather pathetic.

Bingo. Nearly every major media outlet shilled for her. Social media outlets kinda did too. Celebrities did too. There was far more negative coverage on Trump than her.

She still lost.

MonkeyBangingOnGlass.jpg

Originally posted by dadudemon
300+ million Americans were sent and exposed to Hillary-funded propaganda on social media.

A better question for you is, why do you care so much about this? Is it because you have not-a-Democrat as your president? You did not seem to care too much about the billion spent by Obama.

Are you trying to make the case that the average American cannot be trusted to vote because they might get influenced by a person or people whose interests do not necessarily reflect yours? Because that's the only "solution" to your complaint that can actually address the problem. Complaining that someone bought ad space for an election is rather pathetic.

Tbf, Russia has no business in our elections.

Not that there's any evidence for it at all, but hey, Paul needs something to clutch onto after BEING WRONG ALL THE TIME!

Originally posted by Surtur
Bingo. Nearly every major media outlet shilled for her. Social media outlets kinda did too. Celebrities did too. There was far more negative coverage on Trump than her.

She still lost.

👆

They only way the ridiculously hypocritical and butthurt Democrats would have accepted anything about the Trump vs. Hillary election is if Hillary won. If Hillary won, then they'd be saying, "What, it's not okay for people to try and use money to represent their political interests? You're hypocrites!"