Should terrorists get the death penalty?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]I always find it funny how it is MADE to cost more to Off these Living Piles of Shit over feeding, clothing ,and taking care of them for DECADES can cost LESS!

I smell Political and Legal BULLSHIT!!!!! [/B]

It's because the system is setup to allow the person to leech money, indirectly, off the state for over 10-20 years before the execution occurs: appeals.

To me, it's always funny to me that people who work in or have worked in the prison systems are much more likely to be for the death penalty for certain types of inmates and situations.

Originally posted by Foxsteak
My argument is you can't get information out of them if they're dead.

And why do you want information out of them, again? What information? More dead body locations or something?

Originally posted by Foxsteak
Well, they use special injections to kill them "humanely"

It's bullshit.

Right, I think we should send a spike through the brain stem. Much more humane and saves absurd amounts of money.

Originally posted by dadudemon
And why do you want information out of them, again? What information? More dead body locations or something?

Originally posted by dadudemon
Right, I think we should send a spike through the brain stem. Much more humane and saves absurd amounts of money.

Originally posted by dadudemon
It's because the system is setup to allow the person to leech money, indirectly, off the state for over 10-20 years before the execution occurs: appeals.

To me, it's always funny to me that people who work in or have worked in the prison systems are much more likely to be for the death penalty for certain types of inmates and situations.

Like I said....Legal and Political Bullshit.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Right, I think we should send a spike through the brain stem. Much more humane and saves absurd amounts of money.

A few feet of rope, a little bit of lead and gunpowder...not really all that expensive..and you get the non-death row inmates to dig the holes....NOT REALLY THAT EXPENSIVE!

Eh, just deport 'em. If they're citizens, revoke their citizenship and then deport them.

Originally posted by Foxsteak
To understand why these ****ers are ebul., for science.

So how much more case studies do we need? How many more do you think the psychological community needs before they understand murders, serial killers, and sociopaths?

Originally posted by Foxsteak
Cut the sarcasm, I'm asking for a civilised debate.

I'm being serious. That wasn't sarcasm.

Spike through the brain stem. It's effective. Instantaneous. Is reusable. Is low cost. Does not maime so the family can still have an open casket. It is not even close to cruel like the chemical cocktails.

Edit - This is called a "captive bolt pistol." FYI.

Originally posted by RHaggis
Eh, just deport 'em. If they're citizens, revoke their citizenship and then deport them.

You don't "Deport" Terrorists, unless you Deport them via DEATH!

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]You don't "Deport" Terrorists, unless you Deport them via DEATH! [/B]

Simmer down, son.

Originally posted by dadudemon
So how much more case studies do we need? How many more do you think the psychological community needs before they understand murders, serial killers, and sociopaths?

I'm being serious. That wasn't sarcasm.

Spike through the brain stem. It's effective. Instantaneous. Is reusable. Is low cost. Does not maime so the family can still have an open casket. It is not even close to cruel like the chemical cocktails.

Edit - This is called a "captive bolt pistol." FYI.

Spike through brain stem is grusome dude...

Originally posted by RHaggis
Simmer down, son.

.....nah.

Man, the fact this is even a question proves how hard it is to take one alive.

Geneva conventions dictate how pow's are treated, but does this qualify as a pow? Since we're not at war?

Of course, if we did deport them, their host country brush's this aside and welcomes them in with open arms, that's a pretty good excuse for war imo. They'd basically be condoning an attack against the U.S. Not something you can just shrug your shoulders and accept.

The ironic thing about Islamic terrorists is giving them the death penalty is actually doing them a sort of favor.

That is why you castrate them first.

Originally posted by dadudemon
See my requirements 1 and 2.

And if you disagree with how to determine 2, I ask you to determine how you'll determine a group of professionals deem as "non-rehabilitatable" can be rehabilitated. To make my point more clear for you: I'm not going to entertain the idea of "magic future things." If you want to keep them alive because of "magic future things", then I can go into fantasy land can pretend that your magic future things will not exist or the criminals will just get worse and people will be harmed or killed by them which makes you cruel and it makes the system cruel and usual. Except...my points would be factual and not rely on "magic future things."

I'm not talking about "magic future things", I'm talking about realistic past things, like people who have been executed and then later it was proven that they were in fact not the culprit of the crime they were executed over.

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
The ironic thing about Islamic terrorists is giving them the death penalty is actually doing them a sort of favor.

I remember after one of the more recent terror attacks in the UK(hard to keep track of them all) there was this story about a lot of Imams refusing proper burial rights for the terrorist.

Not receiving the proper burial or whatever...it was suggested this can have some negative impact on if the horrible terrorist goes to heaven or gets their virgins. IF true, then we execute them and we make sure they never ever receive a proper burial.

Originally posted by Robtard
I'm not talking about "magic future things", I'm talking about realistic past things, like people who have been executed and then later it was proven that they were in fact not the culprit of the crime they were executed over.

You're talking about something that does not fit within my 2 criteria.

I think afrocheese's point was it kinda pisses them off creating more terrorism....like the iraq war, for example.

I remember hearing the same thing about the reason why they discarded Osama's body in the ocean after they killed him. It always did seem somewhat shady to me though. They could have told the truth... but we basically got no evidence that Osama was actually killed. We just have to take their word for it. That makes me sort of uncomfortable tbh.

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
I remember hearing the same thing about the reason why they discarded Osama's body in the ocean after they killed him. It always did seem somewhat shady to me though. They could have told the truth... but we basically got no evidence that Osama was actually killed. We just have to take their word for it. That makes me sort of uncomfortable tbh.