Should terrorists get the death penalty?

Started by Afro Cheese8 pages

Originally posted by Foxsteak
I think afrocheese's point was it kinda pisses them off creating more terrorism....like the iraq war, for example.
Nah, my point was that they want to be martyrs in the first place

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
Nah, my point was that they want to be martyrs in the first place

*insert Patton Quote here*

So...... kill terrorists?

More like...
"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making some other poor dumb bastard die for his country."

I suppose that's fair.

I prefer to play fair when I can.

Originally posted by Foxsteak
So...... kill terrorists?
I'm saying basically that based on their ideology that would just make them a martyr which is a good thing. But yea.... basically I still think they're worth killing. I don't care cause I'm pretty sure their paradise is false.

I suppose in some cases killing is justifiable.

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
The ironic thing about Islamic terrorists is giving them the death penalty is actually doing them a sort of favor.

One I'm happy to do for them. We both win.

Originally posted by Robtard

My main gripe with the DP is the chance of an innocent person being executed.

That's why I would only put it in on the table if there is overwhelming evidence of a crime. Also, it would be limited to the more evil (imo) acts such as rape and murder.

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
I'm saying basically that based on their ideology that would just make them a martyr which is a good thing. But yea.... basically I still think they're worth killing. I don't care cause I'm pretty sure their paradise is false.

Plus just do the burial thing. If an improper burial is bad...then, well, pigs need food do they not? And pigs would not discriminate against the slop they get fed being ground up terrorist pieces of shit, correct?

Problem solved, and in a hilarious way.

I dunno about the whole no burial = no martyrdom tho

something about it just seems off

like most suicide bombers must know they're not getting any kind of burial

like the 9/11 hijackers... surely they knew their remains wouldn't be recovered

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
I dunno about the whole no burial = no martyrdom tho

something about it just seems off

like most suicide bombers must know they're not getting any kind of burial

like the 9/11 hijackers... surely they knew their remains wouldn't be recovered

Some of them survived anyway.

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
I dunno about the whole no burial = no martyrdom tho

something about it just seems off

like most suicide bombers must know they're not getting any kind of burial

like the 9/11 hijackers... surely they knew their remains wouldn't be recovered

It's possible, but then hundreds of Imams in the UK are super confused about their own religion.

Or was it just virtue signaling?

I mean I think it's a good gesture on their part that they aren't going to condone the supposed martyrs... but I'm not so sure that's really stopping anyone from trying to become one.

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
I mean I think it's a good gesture on their part that they aren't going to condone the supposed martyrs... but I'm not so sure that's really stopping anyone from trying to become one.

I don't think it would stop them from trying to become one, but if there is some way to disrespect them with a burial that, according to the religion, would deny them whatever rewards they seek in "heaven" it should be done.

And in fact I'd argue any Imam that refuses supports radical Islam. So actually I hope this is true, because that actually gives us a way to test how much an Imam is for(or against) radical Islamic terrorism. There are zero good arguments to be made for giving terrorists respectful burials. It'd be a nice test of who is truly a moderate.

Though the CNN article I found about it did not actually list why the "not getting a proper burial" thing was bad in terms of what the religion believes the consequences are.

Eh, unfortunate:

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/06/why-a-mosque-is-refusing-to-bury-the-manchester-attacker/528648/

If I'm understanding that correctly, this is essentially just a way for the muslim community to show disapproval, but it apparently has no bearing on if their horrible god forgives or rewards these douches.

And yet, as the moderates claim, if most of the followers of Islam already disapprove of this behavior...well, "we super duper disapprove!" probably won't do much.

Their God isn't real, Surt. 🙁

Originally posted by Surtur
Eh, unfortunate:

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/06/why-a-mosque-is-refusing-to-bury-the-manchester-attacker/528648/

If I'm understanding that correctly, this is essentially just a way for the muslim community to show disapproval, but it apparently has no bearing on if their horrible god forgives or rewards these douches.

And yet, as the moderates claim, if most of the followers of Islam already disapprove of this behavior...well, "we super duper disapprove!" probably won't do much.

It's sort of like the KKK or nazis in America. The vast majority of white people condemn these groups. That is never going to stop someone from becoming a Nazi; they just think the vast majority of whites are deluded.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Their God isn't real, Surt. 🙁

Nobody's God is real. But if they thought their actions would be met with disapproval from their God they might care. Whereas they will give two shits if other muslims disapprove, they'll just kill those people too.