Originally posted by Silent Master
actually, my statement that Thor doesn't need to breathe was in response to your claim that Aquaman would drown him. That means you made the original claim. As of yet you have provided zero proof for sed claim.
There is no feat that claims that Thor doesn't need to breathe nor that he can't get drowned.
Thor can endure for a period of time without breathing, that's all there is.
Movie Feats Only.
Originally posted by Josh_AlexanderYou said Arthur drowns him. Prove it. How often will you fail to back your claim?
There is no feat that claims that Thor doesn't need to breathe nor that he can't get drowned.Thor can endure for a period of time without breathing, that's all there is.
Movie Feats Only.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
In his training with Vulko. Watch the movie!Evidence is required to prove an absolute, not to deny one.
If you want to claim that a person has infinite strength, you have to prove so, not prove that he doesn't.
Your no limit fallacy won't pass Froth.
I've watched the movie. Nowhere is it stated there that a half atlantean/half human can stay underwater indefinitely.
Normally, I'm fine even if they didn't state this, but according to your logic unless it's specifically stated in the movie we can't assume it because it becomes a no limits fallacy. Seems like you're applying a double standard here.
Originally posted by Josh_AlexanderHow long does it take? Back your claims. Where is the evidence? You just basically blurted out a fantasy and shared it online. This is not how debating works.
Should Thor get into the water, Aquaman pulls him into the depts of the ocean and Thor drowns.As easy as that.
You've lost this.
Originally posted by FrothByte
I've watched the movie. Nowhere is it stated there that a half atlantean/half human can stay underwater indefinitely.Normally, I'm fine even if they didn't state this, but according to your logic unless it's specifically stated in the movie we can't assume it because it becomes a no limits fallacy. Seems like you're applying a double standard here.
Watch it again. Vulko was way clear that Arthur could breathe underwater.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Watch it again. Vulko was way clear that Arthur could breathe underwater.
But Vulko isn't half human is he? Besides, yes Arthur can breathe underwater, but for how long? Is it indefinite?
This is the way you're questioning Thor.
It has already been proven that Thor can survive without oxygen, yet you keep insisting that it is only temporary unless proven otherwise. Therefore using your logic, Arthur can only breathe underwater temporarily unless proven otherwise.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Thor fries everything....OMG....This is way past trolling.How does Thor fry everything? He has no feats underwater.
Seriously Josh? You can't be this dumb can you? You do know that water is a pretty good conductor of electricity right? And you do know that as of Ragnarok, Thor is now able to release lightning blasts from his entire body yes?
Originally posted by FrothByte😂
Seriously Josh? You can't be this dumb can you? You do know that water is a pretty good conductor of electricity right? And you do know that as of Ragnarok, Thor is now able to release lightning blasts from his entire body yes?
We both know josh is up for the dumbest poster of the year with h1. He probably does not know what electricity even is.
Originally posted by FrothByte
But Vulko isn't half human is he? Besides, yes Arthur can breathe underwater, but for how long? Is it indefinite?This is the way you're questioning Thor.
It has already been proven that Thor can survive without oxygen, yet you keep insisting that it is only temporary unless proven otherwise. Therefore using your logic, Arthur can only breathe underwater temporarily unless proven otherwise.
Vulko clearly told Arthur he can breathe underwater.
He never said only pure Atlantians can breathe underwater.
Stop trolling and inventing stuff!!
Originally posted by FrothByte
Seriously Josh? You can't be this dumb can you? You do know that water is a pretty good conductor of electricity right? And you do know that as of Ragnarok, Thor is now able to release lightning blasts from his entire body yes?
Am pretty aware of his powers.
Yet there is 0 evidence they can work underwater.
Movie Feats Only. Wasn't that the argument of debate between us when I initially entered this board!?
How funny to see the table shifting.