Thor trilogy invades DC cinematic universe

Originally posted by quanchi112
No one uscsaying he survives better they are saying you have not proven how long it would take and that Aquaman is capable of doing it. This is the problem you are incapable of even grasping what your own points even are when pressed. Yw.

I won't address any of your posts Quan. You are not worthy of entering court with the Tribunal.

Now stop spamming the thread please.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Exactly! It doesn't show that he can survive forever or that he doesn't require to breathe. You are speculating.

I have exposed your no limit fallacy.

You do not get it.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
I won't address any of your posts Quan. You are not worthy of entering court with the Tribunal.

Now stop spamming the thread please.

Thor wins. You have not proven the time length it would take and that Aqua can do so. Until that moment you concede.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Exactly! It doesn't show that he can survive forever or that he doesn't require to breathe. You are speculating.

I have exposed your no limit fallacy.

It's not a no limits fallacy because we already have proof of him doing so. Originally your claim was that he was holding his breath, which would mean there's a limit to how long he can hold it.

But then we posted proof that he wasn't holding his breath since he was unconscious and still wasn't dying. That proves that his body doesn't need oxygen to survive.

Claiming that he can only do so for a limited amount of time is like me saying Aquaman can only breathe underwater for a limited amount of time. Is that the way you want this discussion to go?

Josh has provided no proof that Aquaman can get Thor into the water, no proof that Aquaman can keep Thor underwater long enough for him to drown, no proof that the kraken can get to the fight in time to help and no proof that the kraken could beat Thor.

Baseless claims by josh hold no water. He concedes. The end.

Originally posted by FrothByte
It's not a no limits fallacy because we already have proof of him doing so. Originally your claim was that he was holding his breath, which would mean there's a limit to how long he can hold it.

But then we posted proof that he wasn't holding his breath since he was unconscious and still wasn't dying. That proves that his body doesn't need oxygen to survive.

Claiming that he can only do so for a limited amount of time is like me saying Aquaman can only breathe underwater for a limited amount of time. Is that the way you want this discussion to go?

Prove Thor can be in space forever.

The feat doesn't show that!

You clearly haven't been paying attention boy. He was holding his breath in Nidavellir. His body was enduring prior to being rescued.

Originally posted by Silent Master
no proof that Aquaman can keep Thor underwater long enough for him to drown.

Thanks for admitting Thor could be drowned.

Perhaps you should tell your brother to stop bringing fallacies into the debate.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Prove Thor can be in space forever.

The feat doesn't show that!

You clearly haven't been paying attention boy. He was holding his breath in Nidavellir. His body was enduring prior to being rescued.

The fact that his body was still alive despite being left unconscious in space already proves it can survive without oxygen.

But fine, you want to play that game? Prove that Aquaman wasn't simply holding his breath underwater. Prove that he can stay underwater forever.

Originally posted by FrothByte
The fact that his body was still alive despite being left unconscious in space already proves it can survive without oxygen.

But fine, you want to play that game? Prove that Aquaman wasn't simply holding his breath underwater. Prove that he can stay underwater forever.

Survive for a period, not that he can live without breathing

Have you watched Aquaman? It was stated that he can breathe underwater....

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Survive for a period, not that he can live without breathing

Have you watched Aquaman? It was stated that he can breathe underwater....

Where in the movie does it state a half-human/half-atlantean can stay in the water indefinitely?

For that matter, where in the movies was it stated that Thor can only survive for a period in space?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Thanks for admitting Thor could be drowned.

Perhaps you should tell your brother to stop bringing fallacies into the debate.

That's not what I said. I said you have provided no proof to back up your claim that Aquaman could drown him.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Where in the movie does it state a half-human/half-atlantean can stay in the water indefinitely?

For that matter, where in the movies was it stated that Thor can only survive for a period in space?

In his training with Vulko. Watch the movie!

Evidence is required to prove an absolute, not to deny one.

If you want to claim that a person has infinite strength, you have to prove so, not prove that he doesn't.

Your no limit fallacy won't pass Froth.

You still have not backed up any of your original claims.

Originally posted by Silent Master
no proof that Aquaman can keep Thor underwater long enough for him to drown

You have conceded that Thor can be drowned.

You've lost the debate.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Prove Thor can be in space forever.

The feat doesn't show that!

You clearly haven't been paying attention boy. He was holding his breath in Nidavellir. His body was enduring prior to being rescued.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
You have conceded that Thor can be drowned.

You've lost the debate.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
You have conceded that Thor can be drowned.

You've lost the debate.

I was listening the claims you have not proven, I didn't concede anything.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You still have not backed up any of your original claims.

You are the ones giving attributes to Thor. You are the ones who need to back up.

I have exposed your fallacies. Cry all you want.

actually, my statement that Thor doesn't need to breathe was in response to your claim that Aquaman would drown him. That means you made the original claim. As of yet you have provided zero proof for sed claim.