Originally posted by dadudemonLol. Bullshit. That sounds like a locker room full of Mormons. People are just seizing upon the worst possible interpretation and assuming that's the only interpretation so as not to look like they condone "that sort of thing."
Yes and Yes. He's pretty much admitted to sexual assault so there's not much room for him to wriggle his way out of it."It's just locker room talk."
Bullshit.
Real locker room talk:
John: "Didja see Jenna's t*ts? Damn fine. I'd like to bury my dick in her ass for weeks."
Joe: "You'd have better luck eating a pile of runny diarrhea with a pair of chopsticks. No body that hot wants to go anywhere near your needle dick."
And if someone tried to steer the conversation to rape or sexual assault, they usually get called out on it. "Don't be a ****in' creepo, David."
Here's a bit of "locker room talk" on display in the real world.
happens around 0:55
YouTube video
"they say harder"
"they say deeper"
"Sometimes I sneek in through the window, without telling her. unannounced"
"Sometimes she takes it"
Originally posted by Robtard
Except no one is defending these "Leftist" while you pick and choose who is a sexual predator and who isn't, despite similar accusations. eg Weinsten has many accusers, he's a scumbag. Trump has multiple accusers, he's innocent.
Right, you aren't defending them at all....just shifting the conversation to someone entirely different lol.
Originally posted by Surtur
Right, you aren't defending them at all....just shifting the conversation to someone entirely different lol.
Pointing out your blatant hypocrisy and double-standards isn't defending someone like Harvey Weinstein(who I have openly condemned as scum), no matter how hard you try with these mental gymnastics of yours.
Once again: if you accept Weinstein is a sexual predator because he has multiple accusers that go back years and years, you have to accept Trump is a sexual predator as well, since he has similar accusers/history
Originally posted by Robtard
Pointing out your blatant hypocrisy and double-standards isn't defending someone like Harvey Weinstein(who I have openly condemned as scum), no matter how hard you try with these mental gymnastics of yours.Once again: if you accept Weinstein is a sexual predator because he has multiple accusers that go back years and years, you have to accept Trump is a sexual predator as well, since he has similar accusers/history
Like I said: you aren't defending them...just shifting to a completely different person lol. You aren't condoning their actions, but you are steering the conversation onto what someone else did or didn't do.
And this time your pal didn't even comment on the story lol, it was just "but Trump!!".
Originally posted by Surtur
Like I said: you aren't defending them...just shifting to a completely different person lol. You aren't condoning their actions, but you are steering the conversation onto what someone else did or didn't do.And this time your pal didn't even comment on the story lol, it was just "but Trump!!".
If I've already condemned Weinstein, Spacey etc as scumbags, what else should I say about them? Considering I've also said all these sexual predators should go down regardless of political standing.
Now, why is Weinstein a scumbag sexual predator, but Trump is innocent, when they've both have many accusers going back decades and they've both maintained their innocence? <--- can you finally answer that instead of dodging
Originally posted by Robtard
If I've already condemned Weinstein, Spacey etc as scumbags, what else should I say about them? Considering I've also said all these sexual predators should go down regardless of political standing.Now, why is Weinstein a scumbag sexual predator, but Trump is innocent, when they've both have many accusers going back decades and they've both maintained their innocence? <--- can you finally answer that instead of dodging
I think all of Trump's accusers are liars and possibly also drug addicts.
Originally posted by Surtur
I think all of Trump's accusers are liars and possibly also drug addicts.
Okay. What makes them different from Weinsteins accusers in regards to their credibility? ie How did you specifically conclude "Weinstein's accusers are telling the truth' and "Trump's accusers are liars"?
https://www.avclub.com/the-george-takei-sexual-assault-story-just-keeps-gettin-1820394008
Stern then asked Takei if he’d ever grabbed a man’s genitals against his will. After a long pause, the actor said “Uh oh” and laughed. When pressed by Stern, Takei made the “skittish” remarks, at which point Stern asked “Do we need to call the police?” Robin Quivers, Stern’s co-host, asked Takei if he’d ever asked anyone who worked for him for sex, which he denied. When asked if any of the groping he’d just admitted to had happened at work, Takei replied “It was either in my home. They came to my home.”
Doesn't look good.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/george-takei-accused-sexually-assaulting-model-1981-1056698
"We have the drink and he asks if I would like another," Brunton recalls. "And I said sure. So, I have the second one, and then all of a sudden, I begin feeling very disoriented and dizzy, and I thought I was going to pass out. I said I need to sit down and he said sit over here and he had the giant yellow beanbag chair. So I sat down in that and leaned my head back and I must have passed out."
Sounds like Takei drugged him.
I don't want the George Takei accusations to be true, but so far it doesn't look good at all. The Howard Stern interview is a "wtf" moment for certain.
Originally posted by Robtard
Interesting. Do you think your disingenuous responses you're now using will clear you of the blatant double-standards you use when it comes to Trump.
Rob, you're a troll sad enough to lie about editing his posts lol. You need to stop acting like you have any moral superiority over anyone here. It just isn't going to work anymore.