You know, Celebs and sex scandals are nothing new

Started by Flyattractor68 pages

Originally posted by dadudemon
You missed his point. It's hypocritical moral outrage.

But let's be more clear: both sides are doing it.

IT does look like Hollywood could eat itself alive over this...

Pam Anderson SLAMS "Victimhood Feminisim"

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]IT does look like Hollywood could eat itself alive over this...

Pam Anderson SLAMS "Victimhood Feminisim" [/B]

Well, it makes sense in that context but the issue is not them going to consensual hotel meet-ups, it's the other things such as the sexual assault?

But it also has to be pointed out that a certain percentage of those Sexually Assaulted" keep going back to said Assault for the Fame and Money they are given.

Aka..Actin liken like a Whore...

Originally posted by Firefly218
Trump is relevant, he's the damn President. Clinton is no longer relevant.

Believe me, if Trump lost I would be the first to never bring him up again

Lol, the fact that Trump is president does not mean that every single time there is a sex scandal involving a leftist "but Trump!" needs to be shouted.

You can try to convince yourself it's not hypocritical, but it is. Either don't complain about it or don't do it.

That is why this amuses me. I know you and other leftists here are 100% incapable of stopping yourselves lol. A tape of Kevin Spacey raping 5 yr. olds could come out and you'd still find a way to squeeze Trump in there.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]But it also has to be pointed out that a certain percentage of those Sexually Assaulted" keep going back to said Assault for the Fame and Money they are given.

Aka..Actin liken like a Whore... [/B]

And that's okay. They would not be part of this conversation, then. If they have a track record of "consent", then it's not so cut and dry. Be there are more than just those involved, here, as you admit.

However, while it may not be criminal, there is still a civil liability. As the boss, if you make your employees do sexual favors to get advantages/promotions, it is a civil law violation under the American Civil Rights Act of 1964 under Title VII.

Originally posted by Surtur
A tape of Kevin Spacey raping 5 yr. olds could come out and you'd still find a way to squeeze Trump in there.

Dude....phrasing.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Dude....phrasing.

Oh would you look at that...probably an accident 😉

Originally posted by Firefly218
Trump is relevant, he's the damn President. Clinton is no longer relevant.

Believe me, if Trump lost I would be the first to never bring him up again

How is the moron in chief, aka Trump relevant to a story about someone else getting caught in a sex scandal?

Originally posted by Silent Master
How is the moron in chief, aka Trump relevant to a story about someone else getting caught in a sex scandal?
Because it’s about accountability. Trump was never held accountable for his crimes and is the most powerful man in the world.

So when republicans try to hold people like Weinstein or Al Franken accountable, but continue supporting Trump? THAT’S called hypocrisy

Originally posted by Firefly218
Because it’s about accountability. Trump was never held accountable for his crimes and is the most powerful man in the world.

So when republicans try to hold people like Weinstein or Al Franken accountable, but continue supporting Trump? THAT’S called hypocrisy

Lol the problem is people pulled the same stuff with anyone who happened to be left leaning and caught in this. It wasn't just politicians. Any time an actor or a news anchor goes down there is a "but Trump!!".

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol, the fact that Trump is president does not mean that every single time there is a sex scandal involving a leftist "but Trump!" needs to be shouted.

You can try to convince yourself it's not hypocritical, but it is. Either don't complain about it or don't do it.

That is why this amuses me. I know you and other leftists here are 100% incapable of stopping yourselves lol. A tape of Kevin Spacey raping 5 yr. olds could come out and you'd still find a way to squeeze Trump in there.

Everyone should be held accountable right? So that means Roy Moore, Kevin spacey, Al Franken, Weinstein, Bill O’Reilly, Bill Clinton AND Donald Trump should be punished. It seems you’re on board for the punishment of everyone except Trump and Roy Moore, which is hypocritical.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol the problem is people pulled the same stuff with anyone who happened to be left leaning and caught in this. It wasn't just politicians. Any time an actor or a news anchor goes down there is a "but Trump!!".
No one is defending the actors or news anchors going down though, right? Everyone is in favor of holding the actors and news anchors accountable, why can’t we hold Trump accountable too?

Originally posted by Firefly218
Everyone should be held accountable right? So that means Roy Moore, Kevin spacey, Al Franken, Weinstein, Bill O’Reilly, Bill Clinton AND Donald Trump should be punished. It seems you’re on board for the punishment of everyone except Trump and Roy Moore, which is hypocritical.

Bingo

If it's truly about accountability, you wouldn't be deflecting these stories with "but Trump" you would be holding these people accountable for their actions and then afterwards you'd be able to say "see, we didn't let politics get in the way of what's right".

Instead you're basically saying that you won't hold your side responsible until the other side does.

Originally posted by Firefly218
Everyone should be held accountable right? So that means Roy Moore, Kevin spacey, Al Franken, Weinstein, Bill O’Reilly, Bill Clinton AND Donald Trump should be punished. It seems you’re on board for the punishment of everyone except Trump and Roy Moore, which is hypocritical.

Lol it's like you don't even get that this isn't even about saying people should or should not be held accountable. It is about taking every single sex scandal and turning it into a reason to b*tch about Trump.

It would be easier for people to just admit this rather than play games and feign ignorance.

Firefly has already condemned as you people would say "his side" on their sexual predatory actions, so your Trumper misdirections won't work

Originally posted by Robtard
Firefly has already condemned as you people would say "his side" on their sexual predatory actions, so your Trumper misdirections won't work

So you're going to feign ignorance? Gotcha lol.

When you spend dozens if not hundreds of posts condemning one person and maybe 6 posts condemning the entirety of "your side". your not fooling anyone.

Originally posted by Surtur
So you're going to feign ignorance? Gotcha lol.

Did you think that was clever? Repeat: No one is really protecting these "Leftist" (as you would say) celebrities/politicians/media etc types, they're all by and large condemned. From Weinstein to Franknen to Lauer. You even tried to spin months back that Donna Brazile was protecting Weinstein when she in fact condemned him. Remember that assclown move?

You Trumper people on the other hand are saying "Weinsten and Clinton are guilty, but Trump and Moore are innocent because of my feelings" type of picking and choosing.

Originally posted by Silent Master
When you spend dozens if not hundreds of posts condemning one person and maybe 6 posts condemning the entirety of "your side". your not fooling anyone.
Because “my side” is already being held accountable. If horrible gross men like Weinstein were NOT being held accountable, I’d spend dozens of posts condemning him too. Because Roy Moore is not being held accountable, I’m spending dozens of posts condemning him. And because Trump isn’t being held responsible, I have to spend dozens of posts on him.

I’m behaving completely impartial to any political bias. If hypothetically Bernie Sanders was found to have sexually assaulted dozens of women, I would condemn him with the same ferocity as I’m condemning Roy Moore and Trump