You know, Celebs and sex scandals are nothing new

Originally posted by Robtard
Firefly has already condemned as you people would say "his side" on their sexual predatory actions, so your Trumper misdirections won't work

He does not truly care about accountability, or even sexual misconduct. All he cares about is "sticking it to Demz and Libz" by any means necessary. If that involves supporting hebephiles, then so be it. If his political opposition holding members on their side of the aisle accountable thins their herd, even better. Their integrity is hilarious, because he is morally bankrupt. Accountability for thee, but not for me, indeed. Hypocrisy is his personal mantra. He is a drain on the system who rails against those who actually contribute. If he had any character at all, he would take a long, hard look at himself. But he will probably just declare, "GOPerverts in charge, you triggered!"

^

Originally posted by Robtard
Did you think that was clever? Repeat: No one is really protecting these "Leftist" (as you would say) celebrities/politicians/media etc types, they're all by and large condemned. From Weinstein to Franknen to Lauer. You even tried to spin months back that Donna Brazile was protecting Weinstein when she in fact condemned him. Remember that assclown move?

You Trumper people on the other hand are saying "Weinsten and Clinton are guilty, but Trump and Moore are innocent because of my feelings" type of picking and choosing.

I don't think it is clever, I think it is true. Nobody said that you didn't condemn it or that he didn't. That is why your "nailed it" that you just posted is truly hilarious lol.

What was said is that they seem incapable of condemning anyone without pulling a "but Trump". What happens is we get two kinds of replies usually from leftists. Either "So and so is bad, but Trump" type stuff, or they just say screw it and mention nothing but Trump lol.

Originally posted by Firefly218
Because “my side” is already being held accountable. If horrible gross men like Weinstein were NOT being held accountable, I’d spend dozens of posts condemning him too. Because Roy Moore is not being held accountable, I’m spending dozens of posts condemning him. And because Trump isn’t being held responsible, I have to spend dozens of posts on him.

I’m behaving completely impartial to any political bias. If hypothetically Bernie Sanders was found to have sexually assaulted dozens of women, I would condemn him with the same ferocity as I’m condemning Roy Moore and Trump

The fact you truly feel you are impartial just shows why arguing with you is pointless IMO.

Originally posted by Surtur
I don't think it is clever, I think it is true. Nobody said that you didn't condemn it or that he didn't. That is why your "nailed it" that you just posted is truly hilarious lol.

What was said is that they seem incapable of condemning anyone without pulling a "but Trump". What happens is we get two kinds of replies usually from leftists. Either "So and so is bad, but Trump" type stuff, or they just say screw it and mention nothing but Trump lol.

The Point: Because Trump's getting a free pass and it looks like Moore's on board to be elected/rewarded, while others are going down in flames (as they should be for their shit actions).

So, why don't you hold both sides accountable?

Most of these stories are being posted before any real conseques come down, so your excuse doesn't really hold up.

Because “my side” is already being held accountable. If horrible gross men like Weinstein were NOT being held accountable, I’d spend dozens of posts condemning him too. Because Roy Moore is not being held accountable, I’m spending dozens of posts condemning him. And because Trump isn’t being held responsible, I have to spend dozens of posts on him.

I’m behaving completely impartial to any political bias. If hypothetically Bernie Sanders was found to have sexually assaulted dozens of women, I would condemn him with the same ferocity as I’m condemning Roy Moore and Trump

Originally posted by Surtur
The fact you truly feel you are impartial just shows why arguing with you is pointless IMO.

Originally posted by Robtard
The Point: Because Trump's getting a free pass and it looks like Moore's on board to be elected/rewarded, while others are going down in flames (as they should be for their shit actions).

So, why don't you hold both sides accountable?

So in other words, Trump is triggering you guys into behaving like hypocrites. I understand.

Originally posted by Firefly218
Is what I just described not impartiality? There are certain things beyond politics and sexual assault is one of them.

If they are beyond politics you wouldn't default to Trump all the time. But you aren't anywhere near being beyond politics lol.

Originally posted by Surtur
So in other words, Trump is triggering you guys into behaving like hypocrites. I understand.

^ Clever

Originally posted by Surtur
If they are beyond politics you wouldn't default to Trump all the time. But you aren't anywhere near being beyond politics lol.

Granted, I hated Trump even before the sexual assault allegations. The fact that so many women have attested to Trump’s horrible behavior should be a concern beyond politics. You can agree with Trump’s policies and still condemn him for his crimes.

I agree with Bill Clinton’s policies, but clearly the man needs to be held accountable every minute of his life for what he did to those women.

Originally posted by Firefly218
If Bill Clinton is the President right now, I’d be with you tearing him down. No one accused of such horrid acts deserves to hold the highest office.

Granted, I hated Trump even before the sexual assault allegations. The fact that so many women have attested to Trump’s horrible behavior should be a concern beyond politics. You can agree with Trump’s policies and still condemn him for his crimes.

I agree with Bill Clinton’s policies, but clearly the man needs to be held accountable every minute of his life for what he did to those women.

When you invoke Trump it's not beyond politics. Not in todays atmosphere, and especially not considering your past posting history.

You also don't even need to invoke him in the same breath as you condemn someone else lol.

IOW: "Don't say mean things about Trump, all others are game though! Wait, not Moore either, cos Trump's now taken him under his wing!"

Originally posted by Robtard
IOW: "Don't say mean things about Trump, all others are game though! Wait, not Moore either, cos Trump's now taken him under his wing!"

Actually, that's not what is said. What is said is that you don't need to immediately invoke Trump every time someone else commits a sex crime lol.

This is not the same as "you can never talk about Trump or say bad things about him". This is also about the fact the same side that whines about whataboutism practices whataboutism.

Originally posted by Surtur
When you invoke Trump it's not beyond politics. Not in todays atmosphere, and especially not considering your past posting history.

You also don't even need to invoke him in the same breath as you condemn someone else lol.

If Bill Clinton is the President right now, I’d be with you tearing him down. No one accused of such horrid acts deserves to hold the highest office.

Granted, I hated Trump even before the sexual assault allegations. The fact that so many women have attested to Trump’s horrible behavior should be a concern beyond politics. You can agree with Trump’s policies and still condemn him for his crimes.

I agree with Bill Clinton’s policies, but clearly the man needs to be held accountable every minute of his life for what he did to those women.

Do you have any proof of this, like evidence that you were calling for Clinton to be held accountable while he was in office?

Originally posted by Surtur
Actually, that's not what is said. What is said is that you don't need to immediately invoke Trump every time someone else commits a sex crime lol.

This is not the same as "you can never talk about Trump or say bad things about him". This is also about the fact the same side that whines about whataboutism practices whataboutism.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Do you have any proof of this, like evidence that you were calling for Clinton to be held accountable while he was in office?

@surtur Whataboutism is used to distract away or make one side seem less awful by comparison. That's not happening here. No one is saying Weinstein is less of a shitlord, because Trump's a shitlord. They're saying Weinstein's a shitlord and condemned him thoroughly. So you failed again

Originally posted by Firefly218
You’re the only one bringing politics into this discussion. If we subtract the politics, Trump is equally as guilty as men like Bill Clinton and Weinstein

But politics is literally the reason you mention Trump lol.