Originally posted by Robtard
A point of fact was made; it wasn't true, proof was shown showing the error. How is that not a valid point/argument?
But you didn't actually refute anything. Please highlight where in your article you linked you feel it negated what he claimed Crowder had said?
Since this:
"one of the reasons people don't like the AR is cause it's black and looks scary, show them a weapon with wood and they'll be ok with it."
Not only was this not saying this is true 100% of the time, but it is talking about the appearance of the gun unnerving people. I didn't see anything in your article about the wooden parts of an AK making people nervous.
Originally posted by Surtur
But you didn't actually refute anything. Please highlight where in your article you linked you feel it negated what he claimed Crowder had said?Since this:
[b]"one of the reasons people don't like the AR is cause it's black and looks scary, show them a weapon with wood and they'll be ok with it."
Not only was this not saying this is true 100% of the time, but it is talking about the appearance of the gun unnerving people. I didn't see anything in your article about the wooden parts of an AK making people nervous. [/B]
Literally the part about guns with wood not being a problem, an optics argument. I showed an AK47 which has wooded bits and people have a problem with that assault weapon as well. I then added that the Parkland shooter also had an AK47 variant in his possession. Are you going to keep ignoring this happened here?
Originally posted by Robtard
Literally the part about guns with wood not being a problem, an optics argument. I showed an AK47 which has wooded bits and people have a problem with that assault weapon as well. I then added that the Parkland shooter also had an AK47 variant in his possession. Are you going to keep ignoring this happened here?
Lol wow. How did you refute it? This person didn't say Crowder said the thing about optics was true 100% of the time.
On top of that, they are talking about the appearance of the gun. You didn't then show anything where people were unnerved specifically because they noticed a gun had wooden parts.
People "have a problem" with the AK in the general sense. it did not come off like it was about looks.
Originally posted by Robtard
Literally the part about guns with wood not being a problem, an optics argument. I showed an AK47 which has wooded bits and people have a problem with that assault weapon as well. I then added that the Parkland shooter also had an AK47 variant in his possession. Are you going to keep ignoring this happened here?
it doesn't matter how many shifting goal posts you cross. if he can't shift them further he just takes his ball and goes home
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it doesn't matter how many shifting goal posts you cross. if he can't shift them further he just takes his ball and goes home
Lol but nothing needs to be shifted. Crowder was talking about looks. Rob acknowledges this. He then says "people have a problem with AK's too".
That is true, but misleading. The problem people have with the AK wasn't the same as the issue Crowder mentioned. At least, that is not anything that Rob showed.
Yet the quote was about the look of an AR-15 unnerving people. It didn't say it always did or was always guaranteed to unnerve more than other guns.
Originally posted by Surtur
Lol wow. How did you refute it? This person didn't say Crowder said the thing about optics was true 100% of the time.On top of that, they are talking about the appearance of the gun. You didn't then show anything where people were unnerved specifically because they noticed a gun had wooden parts.
People "have a problem" with the AK in the general sense. it did not come off like it was about looks.
So you are going to ignore what was just restated and dance to something else. Okay then.
Originally posted by Robtard
^ Still gets trig'd when someone is unflattering but truthful towards his "man"
I should have said most are ok with it and what you said is more stupid then valid. All I meant is that aesthetics count.
Now the left is ok with shot guns which are 5 rounds on most models, what if I showed them a saiga which has a drum with shot gun rounds or a DP-12 which can hold 12 rounds
Now can you stick to the topic or do what most liberals do which is take an error and blow it out of proportion and then act as though they're the smart f^%k in the world
Btw you seem to insult trump supporters a lot, I don't remember trump supporters rioting in the cities, rioting on campus, praising antifa calling them good guys, looking mad as trump announced black unemployment was down
You're still wrong and pushing a fool's argument, eg show one of the Parkland kids a pink AR-15 with peace signs on it and they'll still have a problem with it, because it's still an AR-15 and can do what a "scary" matte back tactical-lookingAR-15 can do.
I've been on topic, in fact, I responding and shattered your post on topic which is why you're throwing a fit rn and Surt's joining in with your meltdown.
Also, can you just use your main account? Rather silly doing this two-person thing.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Which kind of proves that those kids have no real knowledge of what they're talking about, because banning AR type weapons would just cause the shooters to switch weapons and there are plenty of weapon that would make the average mass shooting much worse.
This is a red herring to the point that is being discussed
Originally posted by Silent Master
Which kind of proves that those kids have no real knowledge of what they're talking about, because banning AR type weapons would just cause the shooters to switch weapons and there are plenty of weapon that would make the average mass shooting much worse.
It was just odd seeing some of them on Bill Maher INSISTING they are experts. Maher just kind of let it happen.
Letting these kids behave this way would not seem to be doing anyone any favors. It seems we are teaching them that screeching lies about guns, insisting you're an expert because you were at a shooting(remember that time you went to a concert and came away an expert at that kind of music?), and insisting anyone who doesn't see things your way just doesn't care about dead kids.
Like or hate Dana Loesch, but these kids straight up said she must not care about her own kids that much because she doesn't agree with them.
Unfortunately it's not just the teens spreading misleading information.
George Stephanopoulos gets an alarming number of details wrong in this interview with Dana.
Originally posted by jaden101
It does bring up another question. Are mass shooters buying weapons specifically for that purpose or do they simply use whatever they already own.
I think a big part of them picking the AR-15 is because the media and everyone else is telling them that it's the favored weapon of mass shooters.
I'm glad that most people don't have the first clue that ARs are actually a poor choice for close quarters shooting.