Originally posted by SquallXWhen all your intellectual guides are the exact same archetype, white male conservatives, that is what is being pointed out.
But am Black though? And according to your side mantra, if your a white male, your racist by trying to prove me wrong.Are you guys racist?
On the other side, if someone gets all of their news commentary from BLM african american bloggers, that too would be a bubble.
Originally posted by Firefly218
When all your intellectual guides are the exact same archetype, white male conservatives, that is what is being pointed out.On the other side, if someone gets all of their news commentary from BLM african american bloggers, that too would be a bubble.
You do know there are plenty Blacks conservatives on youtube right? And they face the black lash of being called Uncle Tom, house nigga from you’re side.
At the end of the day, skin color doesn’t matter, only telling the truth should.
Originally posted by Firefly218
When all your intellectual guides are the exact same archetype, white male conservatives, that is what is being pointed out.On the other side, if someone gets all of their news commentary from BLM african american bloggers, that too would be a bubble.
Did you at least look at the video? Maybe point out some misleading alt-facts so you can criticize the source’s credibility or lack thereof?
How did you know that Squall gets all his info from white male conservatives? If he got some info from any none white/male/conservative (or combination thereof) does that mean that bubble” comment has been proved wrong?
What does the source’s race have to do with his credibility? Wouldn’t you be better criticizing the guy’s history where you can point out his biases? Or better yet, actually address the video for misinformation instead of dismissing it based solely on its commentator’s race?
Originally posted by NibedicusI’m not accusing Squal of being in a bubble or talking specifically about any video, I’m referring broadly to a phenomenon. People tend to insulate themselves in a bubble of like-minded like-cultured self-affirming influences.
Did you at least look at the video? Maybe point out some misleading alt-facts so you can criticize the source’s credibility or lack thereof?How did you know that Squall gets all his info from white male conservatives? If he got some info from any none white/male/conservative (or combination thereof) does that mean that bubble” comment has been proved wrong?
What does the source’s race have to do with his credibility? Wouldn’t you be better criticizing the guy’s history where you can point out his biases? Or better yet, actually address the video for misinformation instead of dismissing it based solely on its commentator’s race?
Except yout “bubble” explanation came before you mentioned:
“He might be pointing out that you're in a bubble“
Which looks indirectly accusatory to me.
Also, in this age of the internet, I doubt that your observation rings true to the majority (unless you can provide links to stat analysis?). Of course, extremes on both sides might be due to living in such information bubbles.
Likely most ppl have listened to sources from both sides at certain points of their lives but tend to prefer/listen more to the side which adheres better to their worldview.
And do you think you are not partially guilty of the same bubble?
Answer this question then:
Did you at least look at the video? Or did you dismiss it solely on its commentator’s race or on who posted it?
Ohh Irony... They Taste is So Sweet!
Al Sharpton's Half Bro Charged with Murder after Marching Against Guns.
Originally posted by Firefly218
When all your intellectual guides are the exact same archetype, white male conservatives, that is what is being pointed out.On the other side, if someone gets all of their news commentary from BLM african american bloggers, that too would be a bubble.
By this logic, couldn't the dominance of Jewish intelectuals in many fields be a bubble?
I mean, Freud and his peers in psychiatry, as one example. Of course, Einstein is considered the face of science, but there were many others..
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
but who will defend us from a tyrannical gub'ment with sporting rifles? this is terrible!
As I understand it, repealing the Second Amendment wouldn't ban guns. It would simply eliminate the sense of entitlement to them that causes such push-back to any attempt to regulate them.