Originally posted by Robtard
That was not your/the issue.How else should you deal with armed criminals breaking the law? Should cops go in with bubble-blowers?
If looking like hypocrites was the point for "Rightist" and being no better than those they disparage, sure, they accomplished it. Bravo?
Yes, my issue was that they have constantly said they don't wanna take guns away, and of course they...want to take guns away. They act flabbergasted whenever anyone suggests they do. Where are the denouncements? Where is Nancy Pelosi? This dude is from her state.
And your trolling is getting predictable. Of course if there were laws to get guns and you refused you'd need cops. The entire point is the hypocrisy of all this, the craziness, the way it destroys the narrative they care about saving lives.
And like I said: leftists took the bait. The conservatives haven't actually sheltered anyone in violation of gun laws. If you think they come out of this somehow looking worse you are sorely mistaken.
"They", you're one again lumping people together in mass blanketing style and that's silly. Some like Swallwell do want to take away some guns; not all guns, should make that distinction otherwise you're using classic fear tactics: "they want to take away all your guns!". Granted, fear tactics work, eg just look how Trump used fear against certain groups of people to gather support for himself; it's been studied and proven true.
So I'm the troll now; not you. Just stop. Cept there's no hypocrisy in using armed law enforcement to enforce the law, especially against armed criminals. You need to accept that.
Acting just like the people you disparage does look poorly. That's a fact.
Originally posted by Robtard
"They", you're one again lumping people together in mass blanketing style and that's silly. Some like Swallwell do want to take away some guns; not all guns, should make that distinction otherwise you're using classic fear tactics: "they want to take away all your guns!". Granted, fear tactics work, eg just look how Trump used fear against certain groups of people to gather support for himself; it's been studied and proven true.So I'm the troll now; not you. Just stop. Cept there's no hypocrisy in using armed law enforcement to enforce the law, especially against armed criminals. You need to accept that.
Acting just like the people you disparage does look poorly. That's a fact.
A swing and a miss. They haven't sheltered anyone from crime yet. The goal was to showcase the hypocrisy once you lunatics get a taste of your own medicine. And it worked and you can't stand it.
Spare me your whining about lumping people together, it's like Trump whining about someone elses tweeting habits.
Originally posted by Robtard
If you're employing "but it hasn't happened yet, it's just words so it doesn't matter", then why not apply that same logic to Swalwell's ban/buyback idea? Cos that's just words as of right now.
That is a democrat doing something dems say they didn't want. It's not symbolic. They want this.
The other thing is symbolic. Meant to illustrate a point. You know this and yet pretend not to, why?
Originally posted by Robtard
You're using double standards again. Nothing has happened either way here on both specifics, so we either take both words/ideas seriously or we do not. Choose one; I don't care which.
Lol the point is one request contradicts what dems have been saying they want. Nice try.
Originally posted by snowdragon
That isn't going to stop mass shootings. Maybe we should get rid of ar-15's and 30-40-100 round magazines.Maybe there isn't a law we can pass but we can stop selling tactical items for guns that aren't needed for home defense or hunting.
Maybe we can act like adults and stop pretending like we have a zombie invasion coming in a month and we don't need guns with 100 lego attachments to go plinking out in the woods.
Clearly, acting like adults is far too much for the people with the mind set to mass murder people. If everyone was rational, it wouldn't matter what we had access to, we would have the sanity not to use our arsenal to kill as many people as possible.
You can do a lot of damage with a pistol too. You can keep taking things away, but I'm not convinced these lunatics wouldn't find another way to kill people. Vehicles, Bombs, poisons, etc.
I also don't think the on the minute coverage of every mass shooting helps matters either.
Originally posted by socool8520
Clearly, acting like adults is far too much for the people with the mind set to mass murder people. If everyone was rational, it wouldn't matter what we had access to, we would have the sanity not to use our arsenal to kill as many people as possible.You can do a lot of damage with a pistol too. You can keep taking things away, but I'm not convinced these lunatics wouldn't find another way to kill people. Vehicles, Bombs, poisons, etc.
I also don't think the on the minute coverage of every mass shooting helps matters either.
Bingo. 33 dead at virginia tech. 2 pistols used.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/01/us/chicago-murders-2017-statistics/index.html
The city recorded 650 murders in 2017, a drop from 771 murders in 2016 -- which had been the deadliest year in nearly two decades.
The Chicago Police Department attributed the decrease in murders and shootings to "hard work by officers, adding more sworn personnel, investing in new technology to drive our smart policing strategy, and increasing partnerships."
In 2017, the city had 2,785 shooting incidents and 3,457 shooting victims, which was a decrease from the 3,550 shooting incidents and 4,349 shooting victims in 2016, according to the newly released statistics.
Originally posted by SquallX
So how do you guys feel about Chicago? 7 dead in 12hrs.Would more gun laws have protect those 7 individuals or not?
Any sort of referendum on guns would drive up the crime rates of inner cities very bigly. As prohibition does. The reason these shitholes will reamain shitholes is simply the great mistake of America. Taking blacks outside of Africa. Look at all the beautiful places they’ve utterly ruined. just picture Haiti, Chicago even Brazil nog free. Whitie can take a stone cold volcanic hell such as Iceland and make it a nice place to live. Think about what they could do with absolute control of the luscious tropics and legendary cities of generations past.
Originally posted by SquallX
So how do you guys feel about Chicago? 7 dead in 12hrs.Would more gun laws have protect those 7 individuals or not?
I feel that this city is a steaming shithole and it was made that way thanks to decades of democrat rule here.
Would more gun laws help? Probably not, thugs gotta thug...and 95% of this shit is gang related.
But they focus on important things here like: paying for abortions with tax payer dollars and shielding illegal immigrants.