Mass Shootings in America Thread

Its the results section of that link quoted verbatim.

Here's the conclusion section as well

Conclusions
Australia's 1996 gun law reforms were followed by more than a decade free of fatal mass shootings, and accelerated declines in firearm deaths, particularly suicides. Total homicide rates followed the same pattern. Removing large numbers of rapid‐firing firearms from civilians may be an effective way of reducing mass shootings, firearm homicides and firearm suicides

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Its the results section of that link quoted verbatim.

Here's the conclusion section as well

Conclusions
Australia's 1996 gun law reforms were followed by more than a decade free of fatal mass shootings, and accelerated declines in firearm deaths, particularly suicides. Total homicide rates followed the same pattern. Removing large numbers of rapid‐firing firearms from civilians may be an effective way of reducing mass shootings, firearm homicides and firearm suicides

Repeating the same inaccurate information isn't going to magically make it accurate. They did not have more than a decade free of fatal mass shootings.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Its the results section of that link quoted verbatim.

Here's the conclusion section as well

Conclusions
Australia's 1996 gun law reforms were followed by more than a decade free of fatal mass shootings, and accelerated declines in firearm deaths, particularly suicides. Total homicide rates followed the same pattern. Removing large numbers of rapid‐firing firearms from civilians may be an effective way of reducing mass shootings, firearm homicides and firearm suicides

That claim "by more than a decade free of fatal mass shootings" doesn't appear to be wrong. From 1996 to 2007. There were a few shootings here/there, but they resulted in fewer than 4 victim deaths.

SilentMaster is just being SilentMaster.

The ol' "definition of mass shooting" thing is always fun.

Yeah. Four or more seems to be the accepted number though.

So Rob, you denounce every single democrat who cites the gun violence archive, right?

Originally posted by Surtur
So Rob, you denounce every single democrat who cites the gun violence archive, right?

Wut?

Democrats cite the gun violence archive frequently.

But you called out the place cuz their definition of mass shootings didn't match what the FBI uses.

Yes or no: those dems dipshits? Do they need to find another source?

I've no huge issue with the Gun Violence Archive, sport. Facts are facts.

You took issue with it when I used it, stating it had a different definition of mass shootings.

Now it's okay? Lol.

Okay then: Chicago has had the most mass shootings in 2018. What we gonna do?

I take issue with your silly reinterpretation of things. Guilty there.

Yes or no can the gun violence archive be used?

Decide now, I do not care what you decide, but you shall decide 🙂

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
The ol' "definition of mass shooting" thing is always fun.

Yes, they had to change the definition in order avoid admitting they were wrong.

I like how the gun violence archive was usable by dems until the data showed a majority of mass shootings happen in Chicago. Then suddenly it wasn't good enough and we need to go by what the FBI says.

I'm guessing cuz they couldn't spin all those mass shootings as being done by white people.

Now hey if they take issue with the definitions used by the place fine: it is never to be cited again then.

Well the surrep-***-iousness of the argument shows that gun violence is directed solely at women.
surreptitiousness

Since you're bringing up "race" again, Surt: the shooter in this last Texas mass murder shooting spree was a 36yo White man.

Well, based on population they are underrepresented. so good for him trying to catch up.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Well, based on population they are underrepresented. so good for him trying to catch up.

You seem to be praising a mass murderer...

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes, they had to change the definition in order avoid admitting they were wrong.

I'd like to see the proof of that claim.

Originally posted by Surtur
You took issue with it when I used it, stating it had a different definition of mass shootings.

Now it's okay? Lol.

Okay then: Chicago has had the most mass shootings in 2018. What we gonna do?

Nuke Chicago.