Originally posted by Surtur
Cuz it's not like the guy expressed admiration for Australia and what they did with guns, right?Oh wait, he did. And what they did was a mandatory buy back.
Let me give a tip to anyone who wants more regulations, but doesn't want to take away guns: stop invoking Australia.
They also didn't ban all guns.
Also not sure why you'd say it didn't have an effect given the study outcomes
In the 18 years before the gun law reforms, there were 13 mass shootings in Australia, and none in the 10.5 years afterwards. Declines in firearm‐related deaths before the law reforms accelerated after the reforms for total firearm deaths (p = 0.04), firearm suicides (p = 0.007) and firearm homicides (p = 0.15), but not for the smallest category of unintentional firearm deaths, which increased. No evidence of substitution effect for suicides or homicides was observed. The rates per 100 000 of total firearm deaths, firearm homicides and firearm suicides all at least doubled their existing rates of decline after the revised gun laws
Your source is wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_Australia
Originally posted by Silent Master
Your source is wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_Australia
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2704353/#__ffn_sectitle
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2704353/#__ffn_sectitle
Nothing in that makes your previous source accurate. in fact even that source is wrong about there being no mass shootings.
It's ok to admit that you didn't fact check before posting a bad source.