I'm not a Christian I'm actually pro choice. I just don't like the hypocrisy shown. You don't think these babies are alive, well a lot of people in this country disagree. Why are their feelings to be rejected? When people aren't allowed to reject the fee fee's of people who feel they are the opposite gender?
Originally posted by SurturI suggest those people read a basic biology text book. Nothing more...
I'm not a Christian I'm actually pro choice. I just don't like the hypocrisy shown. You don't think these babies are alive, well a lot of people in this country disagree. Why are their feelings to be rejected? When people aren't allowed to reject the fee fee's of people who feel they are the opposite gender?
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Don't know we don't have dry States.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_in_the_United_States
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Don't know we don't have dry States.
Well in America when we banned alcohol it lead to a huge increase in crime. Ever heard of Al Capone? Of course you have. He's a direct result of prohibition. So are countless other gangsters who murdered countless people. Murder Inc. alone murdered somewhere between 500 and 1,000 people across the country. Granted most of them were gangsters, but sometimes bystanders got caught in the cross fire.
Originally posted by SurturYou still have dry states don't you? Dry towns etc.
Well in America when we banned alcohol it lead to a huge increase in crime. Ever heard of Al Capone? Of course you have. He's a direct result of prohibition. So are countless other gangsters who murdered countless people. Murder Inc. alone murdered somewhere between 500 and 1,000 people across the country. Granted most of them were gangsters, but sometimes bystanders got caught in the cross fire.
Large scale banning in the US doesn't work, all it does it give criminals another revenue stream.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_in_the_United_States
Originally posted by Putinbot1
I suggest those people read a basic biology text book. Nothing more...
🙄
I know you're just probably trolling again but it is an undeniable fact that fetuses are actually alive and they are human beings. A biology book doesn't disprove that so troll harder, pooty.
Haekl's drawings (which were used for a long time as so-called "evidence" for darwinian evolution nosense and still is used in many textbooks today even though proven wrong over 150 years ago at least) were proven to be a fraud long ago. Ernst Haekle (not sure if I'm spelling his name correctly; some german guy) actually admitted that his drawings of human fetuses which he claimed were going thru the "stages of evolution" of "earlier life forms" as they developed in the mother's womb were made up. "Phylogeny recapitulates ontogeny" or something like that is the term used to descibe the nonsense.
He outright lied and many textbooks still use those fake drawings as "evidence" for evolution. It is also used by many pro-abortionists who don't realize the drawings were proven to be a fake to justify abortion by claiming the fetus "isn't really human" so it isn't murder. It is though. You can deny it till your blue in the face, pooty.
Originally posted by Silent MasterWe'd have to see.
Large scale banning in the US doesn't work, all it does it give criminals another revenue stream.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_in_the_United_States
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnaedur Of course modern evolutionary theory is nothing like Darwins. He wouldn't have known a frameshift mutation if it killed him.
🙄I know you're just probably trolling again but it is an undeniable fact that fetuses are actually alive and they are human beings. A biology book doesn't disprove that so troll harder, pooty.
Haekl's drawings (which were used for a long time as so-called "evidence" for darwinian evolution nosense and still is used in many textbooks today even though proven wrong over 150 years ago at least) were proven to be a fraud long ago. Ernst Haekle (not sure if I'm spelling his name correctly; some german guy) actually admitted that his drawings of human fetuses which he claimed were going thru the "stages of evolution" of "earlier life forms" as they developed in the mother's womb were made up. "Phylogeny recapitulates ontogeny" or something like that is the term used to descibe the nonsense.
He outright lied and many textbooks still use those fake drawings as "evidence" for evolution. It is also used by many pro-abortionists who don't realize the drawings were proven to be a fake to justify abortion by claiming the fetus "isn't really human" so it isn't murder. It is though.